Started By
Message

re: SEC Response in Alabama Litigation (Analysis)

Posted on 10/14/26 at 8:24 pm to
Posted by bstaceyau19
New Orleans
Member since Jun 2022
1832 posts
Posted on 10/14/26 at 8:24 pm to
This is all just legal mumbo-jumbo. Defendants field a motion to dismiss. Plaintiffs responded. They had to say something so this is what they said.

The bottom line is this: This suit has zero chance of success. Multiple legal analysts have chimed in with the legal flaws.

The SEC wants to save face. They don't want this tossed and they don't want to settle and not get anything. They want to settle with LSU admitting they did something wrong. LSU won't do this because they know the suit will lose.

Sankey just needs to accept that they are taking the loss here because they were stupid enough to file a nonsense lawsuit to begin with.
Posted by JudgeHolden
Gila River
Member since Jan 2008
19356 posts
Posted on 10/14/26 at 8:39 pm to
quote:

Sankey just needs to accept that they are taking the loss


Likely right. But we will see.
Posted by geauxbrown
Louisiana
Member since Oct 2006
30177 posts
Posted on 10/14/26 at 8:45 pm to
I’m more pissed about this SEC crap than LSU football sucking.
Posted by Oneforthemoney
A town near you, la
Member since Dec 2013
2592 posts
Posted on 10/14/26 at 8:52 pm to
quote:

locked postSEC is in a very uncomfortable legal position and might not have any power over players Posted by Ebridg3 9/11/26 at 2:13 pm This stopped being about two players the second the SEC went into federal court claiming it was a private association with First Amendment rights. Fifteen of the 16 SEC schools are public universities. So now the obvious question is how 15 public institutions, represented by their presidents and chancellors, can get together, make decisions that could crush another public university financially, and then turn around and say those decisions are private. That’s why the Brentwood case matters. The Supreme Court has already ruled that a supposedly private athletic association can be treated as a state actor when public schools and public officials are heavily involved in running it. In that case, 84% of the members were public schools. The SEC is 15 out of 16. And that is really what people were getting at when they kept asking how 15 people could sit in a room and decide LSU’s future. Those presidents and chancellors are not there as private citizens. They are there representing state universities. If the conference is being controlled by those public institutions, then the SEC may not be able to hide behind being a “private association” when it suits them. That also changes the Wright and Harris situation. If the SEC’s actions are eventually treated as state action, their claims could potentially move beyond eligibility and lost money into civil-rights territory, especially if there is evidence they were punished for going to court and winning relief. At that point, the emails, texts and meeting notes between Sankey, Plowman and the other presidents become a lot more important. That’s the real danger for the SEC. They went to court trying to protect their authority over LSU and may have accidentally put the entire legal structure of the conference on trial. And if a court ever says SEC enforcement is state action, this does not stop with the SEC. The Big Ten, Big 12 and other conferences built around public universities could have the exact same problem.
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 5Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

Facebook•X•Instagram