- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 9/18/24 at 3:24 pm to LSBoosie
I have never spoken to anyone who thinks that wasn't an interception. I even live in Alabama now.
Posted on 9/18/24 at 3:26 pm to LSBoosie
quote:
People still don't want to admit that they might have gotten that call correct,
Lmao
Posted on 9/18/24 at 3:26 pm to McTTiger
Have you looked into why they might have called it incomplete or are you just saying that his foot was in bounds? Because I'll agree with you that Pat P got a foot down in bounds.
Posted on 9/18/24 at 3:27 pm to SUB
Joke, the SC player is pushing off the back of the LSU player, leverage, clearly a missed call. They will not admit nothing, what did you expect.

Posted on 9/18/24 at 3:30 pm to SUB
Yet people here really and truly believe these liars aren’t fixing games.
Posted on 9/18/24 at 3:31 pm to LSBoosie
What other reason would there be?
Posted on 9/18/24 at 3:33 pm to lsu4life77
quote:
They still haven't accepted PP7 being inbounds

Posted on 9/18/24 at 3:37 pm to DBG
He’s going to play the Julio touched it while out of bounds card, which isn’t the reason it was ruled incomplete to begin with but was conveniently noticed after the fact.
Posted on 9/18/24 at 3:38 pm to DBG
If the Bama WR was at any point touching the football while his foot was out of bounds before Pat had full possession it would be an incomplete pass.
Posted on 9/18/24 at 3:48 pm to SUB
There's no honor or integrity in todays world with big business. Zero... just profit and childlike defense mechanisms
Posted on 9/18/24 at 3:49 pm to SUB
Surprised the SEC didn't write back and say the LSU player is clearly targeting as the crown of his helmet is in the gut of the USC player.
Posted on 9/18/24 at 3:51 pm to Chicken
quote:
that being said, was our punter lined up too close to those three blockers?
A guy who did not penetrate the line blockers should never get a hand on a punt. A field goal? Maybe. But a punt? No.
Posted on 9/18/24 at 3:52 pm to SUB
The SEC officials will not admit errors. They sent USC the same crap. What concerned me about Beamer's response is things like "I know all of these guys very well" and "I have their numbers and speak to them all of the time" Okay really?
Posted on 9/18/24 at 3:58 pm to SUB
The hilarious part is that SC fans were claiming he didn't jump at all. That he just ran forward and got blocked upwards into the air. That's how you know they're all full of shite. Blatant foul.
Posted on 9/18/24 at 3:59 pm to Sir Fury
quote:The problem isn’t even that they don’t admit the error. It’s that they then give an explanation on why it was correct and then it is immediately proven with photo evidence that what they said was bullshite.
They won’t admit an error by the official. No surprise there.
This post was edited on 9/18/24 at 10:02 pm
Posted on 9/18/24 at 3:59 pm to chaso
quote:
In that picture he's way too close to LOS? Why?
Huh?
He's behind his three protectors that are lined up behind the line.
Posted on 9/18/24 at 4:02 pm to SUB
I think we can all agree that SEC officiating is less than stellar.
Posted on 9/18/24 at 4:08 pm to LSBoosie
quote:
I'm not saying that it's 100% the correct call, but by rulebook it is much, much closer than people on here believe. And I'll have the conversation if anyone wants to.
Really? Why don't you quote the rule book and what rule it was "close" to? It was an NFL interception, he got 2 feet in.
I wanna hear it.
Posted on 9/18/24 at 4:10 pm to LSBoosie
If Jarrett Lee was Joe Burrow, we win that game by 14.
None of that is reality though
None of that is reality though
Popular
Back to top


0





