- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Reflecting on the OU suspension rumors- weed related
Posted on 12/17/19 at 12:50 pm to Beessnax
Posted on 12/17/19 at 12:50 pm to Beessnax
Your argument is don't smoke weed because that's the rules. While I agree you should not put the team in jeapordy your post reads like people are saying they SHOULD smoke weed because weed isn't bad. I think the majority of people are saying the rule is fricked regardless of what players do or do not do. So stop using retarded buzz words/phrases like
And actually understand what people are saying/arguing.
quote:
Generation Z snowflakes and leftover hippies
And actually understand what people are saying/arguing.
1
Posted on 12/17/19 at 1:10 pm to Hard4Victory
quote:
spreading your stupidity
LOL. Says the kid who doesn't know how to use a period.....
Posted on 12/17/19 at 1:11 pm to Tiger Tracker
quote:
Your argument is don't smoke weed because that's the rules. While I agree you should not put the team in jeapordy your post reads like people are saying they SHOULD smoke weed because weed isn't bad. I think the majority of people are saying the rule is fricked regardless of what players do or do not do.
That's not my point at all. My post is about the current rumor of OU playoff suspensions due to positive weed drug screens and how LSU's abstinence policy regarding weed needs to stay in place if this is indeed true.
Maybe you had some smoke in your eyes when you read it the first time.
Posted on 12/17/19 at 1:56 pm to Swamp Angel
It’s less harmful than opioids
How many football players you think take painkillers?
How many football players you think take painkillers?
Posted on 12/17/19 at 2:12 pm to Beessnax
Go undefeated at LSU?
1958 the last time we went undefeated and 3/6 total undefeated seasons LSU has were in the 1800's.
1958 the last time we went undefeated and 3/6 total undefeated seasons LSU has were in the 1800's.
Posted on 12/17/19 at 2:16 pm to 00 Tech Grad
quote:
1. NCAA doesn’t test for weed, just PEDs.
False:
Frequently Asked Questions about Drug Testing
What drugs are banned by the NCAA?
The NCAA bans drugs by class, along with any substance chemically/pharmacologically related to those classes. The banned drug classes are: anabolic agents; stimulants; alcohol and beta blockers (for rifle only); masking agents such as diuretics; narcotics; cannabinoids; peptide hormones, growth factors, related substances and mimetics; hormone and metabolic modulators (anti-estrogens); and beta-2 agonists.
NCAA Q&A on drug testing
Posted on 12/17/19 at 2:33 pm to moneyg
quote:
. I think the OPs point is that if the NCAA is going to crack down before the playoffs, you need an internal policy that helps you adhere to that.
This is exactly my point. Weed, particularly with the potency of it today, is in the body for a long time. If these rumors are true, OU got bit in the arse because they either don't have that internal policy, or they don't enforce it. We are very fortunate (so far anyway, fingers crossed) that none of our guys are having to deal with this problem. This is exactly why we are a championship caliber team.
Posted on 12/17/19 at 2:51 pm to Sir Fury
Don't listen to the stoners, they want everyone to be stoned so they'll seem normal.
Posted on 12/17/19 at 3:14 pm to Beessnax
The morality of weed is irrelevant. The only thing that matters is what the current rules state. If weed's against the rules, it's against the rules. Period. If the rest of college football players can comply--because playing is actually more important to them--then so could the OU players in question. It's not like this creates an unequal playing field.
Now, if you're arguing that these players can't help it, then you're actually hurting your legalization argument more because that tends to support theories of addiction and dependence, which is even more reason to ban it in college sports. It's a lose lose argument in this scenario.
Now, if you're arguing that these players can't help it, then you're actually hurting your legalization argument more because that tends to support theories of addiction and dependence, which is even more reason to ban it in college sports. It's a lose lose argument in this scenario.
This post was edited on 12/17/19 at 3:15 pm
Posted on 12/17/19 at 3:17 pm to Hard4Victory
quote:
t’s not the 70s anymore get over it old piece of shite it is stupid weed will get you suspended when it is already legal in some states and will be legal every where in 10-20 years but keep spreading your stupidity you probably don’t have many years left anyway
Somebody needs to bend you over their knee and spank the shite out of you.
By the way, I’m for legalization.
Posted on 12/17/19 at 3:24 pm to SammyTiger
quote:
It’s less harmful than opioids
How many football players you think take painkillers?
Sure, but prescribed. Not for recreational use. Therein lies the difference.
The "less harmful than" argument is pretty weak. Definitely not the argument to hang your hat on.
Posted on 12/17/19 at 3:30 pm to Beessnax
I think this testing is for PEDs. Not sure, but they tested AL and Clemson last year for PEDs and they lost several players. This is for the CFP teams. Like the Olympics, no PEDs.
Posted on 12/17/19 at 3:57 pm to Swamp Angel
quote:
Sure, but prescribed. Not for recreational use. Therein lies the difference.
I forgot addictive drugs aren’t addictive if they’re prescribed.
quote:
The "less harmful than" argument is pretty weak. Definitely not the argument to hang your hat on.
Maybe with someone named Swamp Angel.
The idea that less addictive less harmful pain relief may be something football players want vs harmful addictive and lethal opioids is the argument.
This post was edited on 12/17/19 at 4:00 pm
Posted on 12/17/19 at 4:15 pm to rsbd
quote:What about it?
You ever seen the back of a $20 bill???????
Posted on 12/17/19 at 4:19 pm to jbraua
quote:Now that weed is legal in half the US, It's none of the NCAA's damn business. Worse yet, it's certainly none of their business after 9/10ths of the season is done.
If weed's against the rules, it's against the rules. Period.
Posted on 12/17/19 at 4:22 pm to Tigeralum2008
quote:
quote:
1. NCAA doesn’t test for weed, just PEDs.
False:
The NCAA has a ban on marijuana, but they leave it to the schools to do the testing for it.
Posted on 12/17/19 at 4:29 pm to Beessnax
quote:..while you are at it, get off his fricking lawn Youngblood...
It’s not the 70s anymore get over it old piece of shite
Posted on 12/17/19 at 4:57 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
Now that weed is legal in half the US, It's none of the NCAA's damn business. Worse yet, it's certainly none of their business after 9/10ths of the season is done.
First, it's not legal is half of the US. Second, the NCAA has the right to regulate its sports in any way it sees fit. Regulations and criminal laws are completely divorce-able in all instances. This is not up for debate. That's like arguing recruiting violations are none of the NCAA's business.
Posted on 12/17/19 at 5:01 pm to SammyTiger
quote:
Weed isn’t a performance inhaling drugs.
Sheeee.... In yo mind, you could take out Lawrence Taylor with one hand with an intact roach in the other. From the comfort of your mind and the couch...
This post was edited on 12/17/19 at 5:03 pm
Posted on 12/17/19 at 5:02 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
It's none of the NCAA's damn business.
They make the rules so it is their business.
Page 3 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News