- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Score Board
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 10/8/25 at 8:42 pm to Thorny
No where near any proof.
A good effort of trying to create a version based on your assumptions of all the details that occurred.
The LSP diagram is simple a visual to help a person create a visual of the events that are detailed in a narrative report.
The accident reconstruction report details laser measured distances and math formula based calculations determination of speed and braking information.
You lack those important details and cannot claim any proof of anything accurately.
You did do a good job with your drawing and stuff however useless it is.
A good effort of trying to create a version based on your assumptions of all the details that occurred.
The LSP diagram is simple a visual to help a person create a visual of the events that are detailed in a narrative report.
The accident reconstruction report details laser measured distances and math formula based calculations determination of speed and braking information.
You lack those important details and cannot claim any proof of anything accurately.
You did do a good job with your drawing and stuff however useless it is.
Posted on 10/8/25 at 8:56 pm to zuluboudreaux
You mean the random guy on Tiger Rant with too much time on his hands wasn’t really able to put together an accurate diagram of the incident? Shocked
Posted on 10/8/25 at 10:14 pm to Lgrnwd
quote:
You mean the random guy on Tiger Rant with too much time on his hands wasn’t really able to put together an accurate diagram of the incident? Shocked
Respectfully, what is inaccurate about the diagram I have presented? I may not be as precise as professionals would be, but I don't think you can say I got any major detail wrong on the facts.
The conclusions and descriptions in the LSP video and diagram do not match the clear evidence of where Lacy's car was from the same video.
This post was edited on 10/8/25 at 10:23 pm
Posted on 10/8/25 at 10:58 pm to Ice Cold
Do they use comparative fault in criminal cases?
Posted on 10/8/25 at 11:59 pm to Thorny
Following too closely and minor speeding vs
Major speeding of 30+, crossing double lines, passing multiple cars.
If the lady doesn’t have to panic, following too closely and minor speeding does nothing. It’s every day driving. Even if she was eating Funyuns. That’s every day shite we all do on the road. The lady wasn’t expecting a mad man to act like a psycho driving F1 on a regular street. Lacy caused the initial chaos. He also ran from the scene. And someone’s life was taken.
He would have had a lot of trouble at trial. He was so careless it almost looks like he didn’t care about putting people in serious danger or the fact that there was a serious accident. Because he ran. That in itself is a serious crime.
So everyone keep in mind. Small minor infractions vs psycho F1 driving and fleeing. Lacy was cooked.
Major speeding of 30+, crossing double lines, passing multiple cars.
If the lady doesn’t have to panic, following too closely and minor speeding does nothing. It’s every day driving. Even if she was eating Funyuns. That’s every day shite we all do on the road. The lady wasn’t expecting a mad man to act like a psycho driving F1 on a regular street. Lacy caused the initial chaos. He also ran from the scene. And someone’s life was taken.
He would have had a lot of trouble at trial. He was so careless it almost looks like he didn’t care about putting people in serious danger or the fact that there was a serious accident. Because he ran. That in itself is a serious crime.
So everyone keep in mind. Small minor infractions vs psycho F1 driving and fleeing. Lacy was cooked.
This post was edited on 10/9/25 at 12:56 am
Posted on 10/9/25 at 12:10 am to Thorny
quote:
I believe he was in error
I do, too. I think it’s one of those situations where someone’s playing lane jockey on the interstate or a motorcycle is driving recklessly and you say “They’re going to cause a wreck.” Then you actually see a wreck and automatically assume it was that driver’s fault.
Posted on 10/9/25 at 2:06 am to JTA1985
quote:
you slam on your brakes. you dont cross into incoming traffic! she clearly was not paying attention and panicked into a dumb decision.
Correct. There’s no way she was reacting to Lacy’s car because if she could see Lacy’s car at that point (even if assuming he was still in her lane) then she most definitely would have been able to see the car she hit head-on. Even in split second decision-making you aren’t going to choose that option if that were the situation. She was only trying to avoid the truck.
Posted on 10/9/25 at 5:19 am to Thorny
The only question we need to answer is if Kyren was in the wrong lane of travel. If so, then he's at fault.
Posted on 10/9/25 at 5:37 am to DustInTheWind
quote:
everyone keep in mind. Small minor infractions vs psycho F1 driving
The fact you called tailgating, which caused someone to die, a minor infraction is hilarious
Saying tailgating doesn't matter until someone has to use the brakes is also dumb. It's the road, someone having to use the brakes is a common occurrence.
Posted on 10/9/25 at 5:53 am to GetmorewithLes
quote:
Why does turning into a head on collision to avoid a potential collision seem so plausible?
Why are some of y’all acting like this is so unheard of? I’m not saying it isn’t stupid, but it is incredibly plausible.
Posted on 10/9/25 at 6:24 am to icecreamsnowball
quote:
it is incredibly plausible
It really isnt when you consider how far away Lacy was and the fact he was back in the correct lane at the time of the wreck.
Running into someone because someone else is a football field away isnt plausible. It only makes sense if she panicked and swerved to avoid the truck right in front of her.
She was probably on her phone like 50% of people I pass in traffic
Posted on 10/9/25 at 6:24 am to icecreamsnowball
quote:
it is incredibly plausible.
Maybe on a divided highway bit it is incredibly stupid to do a hard swerve into potential oncoming traffic.
Posted on 10/9/25 at 7:13 am to icecreamsnowball
quote:
Why are some of y’all acting like this is so unheard of? I’m not saying it isn’t stupid, but it is incredibly plausible.
Because they need the former LSU player to be absolved of all guilt.
Posted on 10/9/25 at 7:21 am to RB10
quote:
Trust the math.
At 130 yards (This is almost 60 yards longer than Lacy's attorney admits the evidence shows he entered his proper lane of travel and 60 yards BEFORE the accident occurred) and traveling 70 MPH the time the gold truck had before a head on collision was 1.3 seconds. This is being generous to Lacy and assuming the truck was traveling 30 MPH.
At 80 yards, that's less than a second. Explain to me how Lacy is not responsible for the responses of those he was less than 1.5 seconds away from being in a head on collision with while he was passing 4 vehicles on a 2 lane road in a no passing zone.
This is the catalyst of this tragic situation. Lacy's recklessness created a dangerous situation that caused a few split-second decisions in what looked to the drivers to be an upcoming head-on collision.
Lacy swerved back into his lane a second before the collision, the truck driver swerved to the right, and the Kia lady swerved to the left because of a driver approaching them head-on at a high rate of speed in their lane.
In a panic situation, not all decisions survive the scrutiny post incident. Some decisions (swerving left) make no sense but I'm sure it was a reaction and not a thoughtful process in the second available to make the decision.
It sucks for all involved, but we have to admit that Lacy (illegally) initiated the chain of events that led to an immediate death.
Posted on 10/9/25 at 7:28 am to ATL_Tigerfan
quote:
It sucks for all involved, but we have to admit that Lacy (illegally) initiated the chain of events that led to an immediate death.
Oh they most certainly don’t have to admit it. Just look at the number of posts explaining away Lacy’s actions and putting the blame entirely on someone else.
They want to believe literally anything else besides it being Lacy’s actions that caused the event.
Funyun lady, police corruption, DA corruption, lying witnesses, doctored video. Literally anything else.
This post was edited on 10/9/25 at 7:31 am
Posted on 10/9/25 at 7:39 am to Thorny
Almost the last people I trust are government employees. Interesting what some good editing can do.
Posted on 10/9/25 at 9:11 am to Thorny
"woman"
Do you guys really need to read more? My God, she was NOT avoiding Lacy by hiding in the grill of an oncoming vehicle!
How bout brakes bitch?
She was distracted, period. Id bet texting. That would explain a reaction into traffic. She wasn't aware of her own situation.
IF so, any rational human would NOT swerve that way.
All the fricking crooked cops are doing, is giving her lawyers an "out" by saying she was scared of Lacy hitting her.
Its made up...fabricated. The truth will prevail. A cop made them write certain things, that one of the other drivers REFUSED TO SIGN!. What else do you need?
Do you guys really need to read more? My God, she was NOT avoiding Lacy by hiding in the grill of an oncoming vehicle!
How bout brakes bitch?
She was distracted, period. Id bet texting. That would explain a reaction into traffic. She wasn't aware of her own situation.
IF so, any rational human would NOT swerve that way.
All the fricking crooked cops are doing, is giving her lawyers an "out" by saying she was scared of Lacy hitting her.
Its made up...fabricated. The truth will prevail. A cop made them write certain things, that one of the other drivers REFUSED TO SIGN!. What else do you need?
Posted on 10/9/25 at 9:13 am to Thorny
Geezus man turn the freaking page.
Posted on 10/9/25 at 9:19 am to Swamp Frog x
quote:
But for a car traveling 30-50 mph it’s still only 1.5-3 second difference. You get a car flying at you at that short of a distance and see how you react.
One car was traveling 50. Lacy was going 100. Less than 2 seconds for them to collide
Page 4 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News