Started By
Message

re: Players opting out shows the difference of character between our generations.

Posted on 1/3/22 at 8:37 am to
Posted by yakn2ya
3 stars past mars
Member since Nov 2007
268 posts
Posted on 1/3/22 at 8:37 am to
Absolutely correct.
Posted by iBack8569
Member since Dec 2021
1545 posts
Posted on 1/3/22 at 8:38 am to
Expanding the playoff field to the top 8-12 teams instead of 4 cherry picked P5 teams would likely cut down on the opt outs from the elite not in the top 4. Give them something more tangible to play for and they will stay.
Posted by Chalkywhite84
New orleans
Member since Dec 2016
31282 posts
Posted on 1/3/22 at 8:38 am to
quote:

of these same kids will quit and claim it is to avoid risking injury yet they lack the mental discipline to back off the devil's lettuce for just a few month's until the


Anyone who says the devil's lettuce is already out of touch.
Posted by OKtiger
Tulsa, OK
Member since Nov 2014
8639 posts
Posted on 1/3/22 at 8:41 am to
I would still opt out and make millions of dollars.. so would you

Money talks
Posted by atltiger6487
Member since May 2011
19142 posts
Posted on 1/3/22 at 8:44 am to
quote:

What is way worse than any player deciding to opt out or transfer is the remote idea that any of those players owe you, the fan, any considerations whatsoever.
well, the fans (i.e., taxpayers) pay their scholarships, pay their coaches, fund the facilities they play in, etc.

So if the players accept the scholarship money, the players actually do owe it to the university, and the fans, to play to the best of their ability.

Now yes, for a potential high draft pick, I can understand the business decision of opting out of a crappy bowl, but that only applies to a very few players.

Another problem is the many, many crappy bowls. In the old days, only 30 teams made it to a bowl, so it was an honor. Now, 84 out of 130 teams go to bowls. Most are garbage.
Posted by Gus007
TN
Member since Jul 2018
13244 posts
Posted on 1/3/22 at 8:45 am to
quote:

The parents and grandparents of these greedy young adults should be called task!




The parents and Grandparents, some they don't even know, are the problem.

The ones they know will be in line with their hands out.
Posted by Choupique19
The cheap seats
Member since Sep 2005
63297 posts
Posted on 1/3/22 at 8:56 am to
quote:

Tell a running back that has maxed out their draft potential and these manufactured games become an unnecessary risk.


Who labeled the Rose Bowl a manufactured game? Who labeled the Peach Bowl (a NY6 Bowl) a manufacturered game?

If you are fine with players quitting for any bowl game, you should be fine with them quitting before a playoff game. I mean, they got to feed their families, right?
Posted by LCTFAN
New Iberia
Member since Mar 2013
2824 posts
Posted on 1/3/22 at 8:59 am to
quote:

Your school pride about 1 game doesn't feed their families for years.

quote:

tiggerthetooth


Student Athletes is missing in your logic

Education feeds families for years.

For the majority of players education should be the primary reason for playing college football. Even the elite need to know how to manage money and get through life.

The NIL is ok, transfering without sitting out 1 year is a mistake the NCAA has allowed. College credits may not transfer delaying getting a degree.

Lost is the primary reason for college athletics, education.
Posted by HubbaBubba
North of DFW, TX
Member since Oct 2010
48773 posts
Posted on 1/3/22 at 9:00 am to
Change the circumstances and ask if you'd feel the same.

You work at a reasonably dangerous job. You get offered a new job, paying you triple what you currently earn, bringing you a new level of financial security and the ability to save for your kids' college education.

You can either put in your notice and work for two more weeks, knowing that you risk injury that would negate the new job offer, or, you determine you don't owe your current employer your future. After all, it's just a job. They pay you for your time and expertise. The moment you stop, they stop paying you.

In those terms, which would you choose? For those would answer, "I owe it to the company for having trained me." or "It's only right to provide a two-week notice." do you think once you leave they are going to collapse and fail? Do you really think you matter that much to them? Because if you were that important to them, shouldn't they have been paying you "you're more important to us" money to begin with?
Posted by Bert Macklin FBI
Quantico
Member since May 2013
11012 posts
Posted on 1/3/22 at 9:01 am to
quote:

Players opting out


You don't have to like it but Bowl games outside of the playoffs are now exhibition games for next year's team.
Posted by Shaq4prez
The Deaf Dome
Member since Oct 2021
4109 posts
Posted on 1/3/22 at 9:05 am to
quote:

The average NFL salary 50 years ago was $23,000.

The average NFL salary in 2021 is $860,000.


So tired if seeing this argument. This is dumb and childish and you are showing your immaturity.

$23,000 50 years ago is $860,000 in 2021. Its the same. Milk was .10c a gallon. Now its $3.50. its all relative. Sorry for those who cant understand basic economics and inflation
Posted by Fightin Okra
Member since Nov 2016
5935 posts
Posted on 1/3/22 at 9:07 am to
That is today’s society in general
Posted by how333
Member since Dec 2020
2604 posts
Posted on 1/3/22 at 9:07 am to
The 33% downvotes shows the generational differences, for the worst, even amongst the posters on this board. Lou is 100% correct.
Posted by irishTiger18
Chicago
Member since Oct 2019
705 posts
Posted on 1/3/22 at 9:10 am to
I don’t know about ten but I can name one:
Jaylon smith Notre dame. Blows out his knee in the fiesta bowl ‘16 against Ohio state(funny enough I was recovering from acl surgery when it happened).Goes from a top ten pick to 34th pick overall, selected in the second round, and now he’s only in the league bc of depleted covid rosters.

He literally lost millions in rookie deal and never got that second contract that creates insane generational wealth.
Posted by irishTiger18
Chicago
Member since Oct 2019
705 posts
Posted on 1/3/22 at 9:18 am to
But, it’s not the average player who is opting out. It’s top round guys opting out.

So please compare apples to apples and look at the average top 2 round contracts.

Which LSU guys aren’t playing? Clark and TDP. Clark is a first rounder and TDP is a rb. TDP isn’t a top round guy IMO but he is a rb and they have a tiny shelf life.
Posted by irishTiger18
Chicago
Member since Oct 2019
705 posts
Posted on 1/3/22 at 9:20 am to
What if the school is a private university or that boosters pay the coach?
Posted by Mo Jeaux
Member since Aug 2008
59752 posts
Posted on 1/3/22 at 9:23 am to
quote:

$23,000 50 years ago is $860,000 in 2021.


No it’s not.

quote:

Sorry for those who cant understand basic economics and inflation


You obviously don’t.
This post was edited on 1/3/22 at 9:25 am
Posted by SaveFarris
Member since Apr 2012
2175 posts
Posted on 1/3/22 at 9:23 am to
There is no way Lou Holtz said this.

He may have thought it.
He may have written it.

But if he said it, it would have sounded like “pbbbt, todays apppthletes hfrsbo fun tdhjn urejj pfvjo ylbfee Knute Rockne!!”
This post was edited on 1/3/22 at 9:24 am
Posted by geauxtigers33
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2014
13734 posts
Posted on 1/3/22 at 9:26 am to
quote:

For the majority of players education should be the primary reason for playing college football. Even the elite need to know how to manage money and get through life.


Personally I think you should be able to major in football while playing college football if you think that’s what you want to do the rest of your life. Could be classes on money management and life skills and former players can be the professors so now you are actually creating a new line of work for athletes that didn’t make it at the professional level.

How is that different than someone getting a degree in anything else they think they will do the rest of their life? Sometimes people get that degree then end up doing something completely different any way.
Posted by BornAndRaised_LA
Springfield, VA
Member since Oct 2018
5968 posts
Posted on 1/3/22 at 9:35 am to
quote:

Football is on pace for a slow death, nfl ratings are down, college football ratings down, attendance is down. People are choosing not to watch soft, quitting, divas.


Cute narrative, but wrong on all counts:

NFL ratings are up 17% this year
NFL viewership up

College football ratings have held steady. For example, SEC Championship this year was just over 15M viewers. Ten years ago, it got 16M. Not exactly plummeting.

Attendance is a different story and I don’t think tied to “not watching divas” since digital viewing isn’t declining. Ticket costs are up, getting to and parking on campus is a nightmare, TV offerings have gotten better and faster relative to going to games in person.

Simply put, the TV numbers support that fans still watch, they just don’t do it in person because I’m 2021 they no longer have to fight the hassle in order to see their team.

first pageprev pagePage 3 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram