1
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Players file motion for contempt against Sankey, SEC, and LSU
Posted on 10/7/26 at 6:15 pm to ItTakesAThief
Posted on 10/7/26 at 6:15 pm to ItTakesAThief
quote:
Also if it comes to a suit, SEC will blame LSU for talking to these kids allegedly in violation of SEC rules
That doesn’t make sense because the timeline doesn’t support it.
When did the SEC make and vote on the rule?
Posted on 10/7/26 at 6:19 pm to CatfishJohn
quote:
I hope they put that Tennessee bitch on the stand
She’ll probably go berserk afterwards and try to get LSU expelled from the conference again.
Posted on 10/7/26 at 6:20 pm to Veritas
quote:
That doesn’t make sense because the timeline doesn’t support it. When did the SEC make and vote on the rule?
Yeah, you can’t make a rule suddenly after the fact and then retroactively apply it.
Posted on 10/7/26 at 6:22 pm to cbree88
quote:
Yeah, you can’t make a rule suddenly after the fact and then retroactively apply it.
SEC is North Korea
Posted on 10/7/26 at 6:38 pm to Tiger Voodoo
quote:
This isn’t difficult to grasp for anyone that doesn’t just want to argue or be contrarian.
SFP is a lawyer. So am I.
Sometimes our search for the truth seems belligerent or contrarian. We are trained to test and challenge any argument to see if it withstands scrutiny. The best of us revise our views when the counter argument is sound.
Almost every lawyer has a moment of clarity some time after law school in which we realize we don’t have to fight every fight or win every argument. But sometimes — and I speak for myself here — we lose that insight and can’t stop ourselves.
I still do it from time to time.
Let me say here I don’t know the particulars of SFP’s positions or overpersistence on this particular issue.
All I am saying is that argument is the way to truth for the legal mind, and sometimes, even when properly restrained, it can be off putting.
Hope that makes sense.
Posted on 10/7/26 at 6:45 pm to JudgeHolden
That sounds miserable.
Posted on 10/7/26 at 6:48 pm to Veritas
quote:
That sounds miserable.
It can be exhilarating. I’m going to leave the discussion there to avoid derailing the thread.
To try to make it relevant, I checked the clerk of court website, and the image of the motion for contempt still isn’t available.
Posted on 10/7/26 at 7:22 pm to JudgeHolden
quote:
SFP is a lawyer.
I don’t believe that for a second.
Posted on 10/7/26 at 7:24 pm to cbree88
quote:
I don’t believe that for a second.
Thought it had been confirmed. But I really can’t say for sure.
Hopefully the image of the motion will hit the clerk’s website tomorrow so I can read it.
This post was edited on 10/7/26 at 7:25 pm
Posted on 10/7/26 at 7:40 pm to bluestem75
quote:
The contempt isn’t the Federal filing, it’s deliberately interfering with LSU’s ability to roster the players as ordered by the court.
i haven’t read the entire thread yet, so apologies if already answered.
but from a legal standpoint, can LSU just say something along the lines of “we decided to roster these other two people that have been with the team longer rather than two newcomers”. and be cleared of this shite?
i mean just because LSU was “cleared” to roster them with the court order, doesn’t necessarily mean they “have to” roster them. right?
Posted on 10/7/26 at 7:47 pm to nicholastiger
LSU is not leaving the SEC. It’s a founding member And even though football is King . That is not the only sport. You simply don’t know what you’re talking about.
Posted on 10/7/26 at 8:52 pm to tiger lady
quote:
He always seems to enjoy playing the contrarian. It gets very tiresome and detracts
I stopped reading his posts or replies to him, and got through an 11-page thread in about 5 minutes.
Posted on 10/7/26 at 9:15 pm to Buryl
Sankey fricked up so bad...
Posted on 10/7/26 at 9:32 pm to Buryl
Good for them, really bad for the SEC. Adding LSU to the case is really going to expose the strong arm tactics and that LSU followed their guidance.
Posted on 10/7/26 at 9:55 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
The specific lines of professionalism with these specific NFL guys were always a more bright line rule
Posted on 10/7/26 at 10:12 pm to itig19
I really hope protect college sports fails
Posted on 10/7/26 at 11:30 pm to Buryl
Tennessee should have been concerned about the two drugs that were not on the lethal injection roster. When Tennessee enacted lethal injection it was a three drug cocktail, but only one was used recently. The other two drugs must have went professional so couldn’t be used.
This post was edited on 10/7/26 at 11:32 pm
Posted on 10/7/26 at 11:34 pm to SloaneRanger
quote:
Judge can’t enjoin anyone not a party.
Tony Clayton did during the hearing on Sept. 3rd.
Posted on 10/8/26 at 12:31 am to JudgeHolden
quote:
It can be exhilarating.
Talking yourself out of morals and ethics can be exhilarating?
Well no shite you degenerate.
Welcome to being 7 years old.
Page 11 of 11
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News