- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Per SEC official, Jay Johnson will be available to coach today
Posted on 5/26/24 at 8:16 am to K2LAW
Posted on 5/26/24 at 8:16 am to K2LAW
quote:
My point from the beginning. The batter stepped out of the box before the catcher reacted to the throw from the mound
It all happened at the same time but I agree anyway because the batter vacated the box on his own, not because the catcher moved him out.
The rule guy on later said the balk was called on the catcher as well as interference.
1
Posted on 5/26/24 at 8:41 am to GetmorewithLes
I can not ever remember a run scored without the player tagging home plate.
We recently lost a run cause the runner did not tag third.
I think it is absurd that no challenge is allowed on a play that could determine the outcome of the game. When a run is scored a challenge should automatically be allowed. Seems like football has automatic review of all the touchdowns scored.
We recently lost a run cause the runner did not tag third.
I think it is absurd that no challenge is allowed on a play that could determine the outcome of the game. When a run is scored a challenge should automatically be allowed. Seems like football has automatic review of all the touchdowns scored.
Posted on 5/26/24 at 8:41 am to sabbertooth
quote:
The SEC statement is a clear admission they know they totally screwed up this situation. If the SEC truly felt they were correct they would leave him suspended.
An admission that he should not have been ejected, yes. An admission that they got the catchers balk call wrong, no. Two separate issues.
Posted on 5/26/24 at 9:10 am to TigerPlate
quote:It's in the rules. If the runner is originally called out, he does not have to touch home.
can not ever remember a run scored without the player tagging home plate.
Posted on 5/26/24 at 10:08 am to sabbertooth
Goes to show you what an "Umpire's Judgement Call" can make when the call itself was horribly wrong. Then to top it off, this so-called rule is "Not Reviewable"! That needs to change and needs to change this coming year!
Posted on 5/26/24 at 10:09 am to AlxTgr
quote:
It's in the rules. If the runner is originally called out, he does not have to touch home
If he's originally called out then the play isn't reviewable and can't be reversed.
Posted on 5/26/24 at 10:11 am to sabbertooth
I’m completely fine with the umps making an incorrect judgement call. Neal didn’t touch the plate but he wa every close. That’s fine
What I’m not fine with is them not explaining who changed the call? The home plate ump said out. Who reversed it?
Then they also were a circus getting play resumed as well
What I’m not fine with is them not explaining who changed the call? The home plate ump said out. Who reversed it?
Then they also were a circus getting play resumed as well
Posted on 5/26/24 at 10:24 am to lsupride87
quote:
What I’m not fine with is them not explaining who changed the call? The home plate ump said out. Who reversed it?
Right. How did they change a call that's not reviewable? I still don't know what the "judgment" was. Catcher had the ball in his hand. My understanding of the "rule" is that he was fine where he was.
One of the biggest bungles I've ever seen.
Posted on 5/26/24 at 10:44 am to Gris Gris
Just get out today and get some rest
Posted on 5/26/24 at 10:47 am to Gris Gris
quote:
What I’m not fine with is them not explaining who changed the call? The home plate ump said out. Who reversed it?
Exactly, the play is not NOT reviewable. How in the hell do you change an original call of out 10 minutes later. Umps need to be reprimanded.
Posted on 5/26/24 at 10:54 am to da prophet
It’s like if a call at first is out. The umps convene and change the call with no video review. Pathetic
Posted on 5/26/24 at 11:06 am to da prophet
quote:
Exactly, the play is not NOT reviewable. How in the hell do you change an original call of out 10 minutes later. Umps need to be reprimanded.
To me the only way that can happen is if one of the other umps overruled him during their conference. But I never saw any of the other umps signal for a balk. And none of the other umps could possibly have seen where Neal was positioned in relation to home plate.
Posted on 5/26/24 at 12:42 pm to saint tiger225
What happened to last night’s entertaining thread? 
Posted on 5/26/24 at 1:17 pm to saint tiger225
quote:
Plus - all SEC umpires who worked the LSU vs USCe game will be fired for pure incompetence and stupidity.
Would set a bad precedent. After a few games, the league would run out of umps/refs.
Posted on 5/26/24 at 1:38 pm to ForeverEllisHugh
quote:
What was with the quick hook in the first place?
Refs (any sport) are always more touchy when they know they are wrong. You can usually get away with a lot more when they are sure of their decision.
This post was edited on 5/26/24 at 1:39 pm
Posted on 5/26/24 at 2:06 pm to Miss3Channels
Sit this cocky mf down
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News