Started By
Message

re: Pay this a-hole his money and move on

Posted on 11/11/25 at 8:10 am to
Posted by KiwiHead
Auckland, NZ
Member since Jul 2014
35327 posts
Posted on 11/11/25 at 8:10 am to
That would be the frick job to end all frick jobs.

Do you think we could afford a HS coach if that really did come to pass?
Posted by abellsujr
Member since Apr 2014
37259 posts
Posted on 11/11/25 at 8:11 am to
quote:

So be it though pay him monthly for 6 years
His lawyer team is being shite heads by going publicly with the negotiations. We don’t know all of the details, but I think we can all agree that Kelly is a bitch.

It sounds like Kelly has no aspirations of coaching again because why else would you choose payments over 6 years over a lump sum? Kelly continues to lie and manipulate.
This post was edited on 11/11/25 at 8:11 am
Posted by Pikes Peak Tiger
Colorado Springs
Member since Jun 2023
9008 posts
Posted on 11/11/25 at 8:12 am to
quote:

Saying he wasn’t fired?


Wait, what now?
Who is saying he wasn’t fired?
Posted by BhamTigah
Lurker since Jan 2003
Member since Jan 2007
17220 posts
Posted on 11/11/25 at 8:12 am to
Here’s the problem with just paying him…where’s the money coming from? Actual people have to step up and say frick it, we’ll cover it. If big donors were saying that, we have no problem. The $30 million we offered is probably the amount that donors have ponied up.

Our administration/governor weren’t smart enough to secure the buyout before firing the man.
Posted by Larry_Hotdogs
Texas
Member since Jun 2019
1833 posts
Posted on 11/11/25 at 8:13 am to
quote:

because he and Kelly do not have faith that they will see the payments out over 6 years and LSU has demonstrated a lack of trustworthiness


First, this is a hot, hot take and highly improbable. Second, has this perceived lack of trustworthiness been demonstrated by LSU historically?
Posted by GeauxLSU4
New Orleans
Member since Feb 2012
11851 posts
Posted on 11/11/25 at 8:14 am to
quote:

Can we ban everyone chirping this over & over once it’s shown to be untrue?

Can we ban people like you that think the past three weeks makes LSU more desirable for prospective coaches?
Posted by Pikes Peak Tiger
Colorado Springs
Member since Jun 2023
9008 posts
Posted on 11/11/25 at 8:14 am to
quote:

For all of you "bigger picture" guys... imagine someone offering to donate buyout money to you.. and then you just bend over and let the coach screw you.


If it is stipulated by a legal contract, how the coach screwing anyone by demanding what he is legally owed?
Posted by Havoc
Member since Nov 2015
37127 posts
Posted on 11/11/25 at 8:24 am to
quote:

Guys. LSU is poor. They don’t have the dough to make the payment.

STFU you retard.
Posted by smooth99
Member since Oct 2003
708 posts
Posted on 11/11/25 at 8:27 am to
quote:

His lawyer team is being shite heads by going publicly with the negotiations. We don’t know all of the details, but I think we can all agree that Kelly is a bitch.

It sounds like Kelly has no aspirations of coaching again because why else would you choose payments over 6 years over a lump sum? Kelly continues to lie and manipulate.


This. From what information we have, LSU hasn't breached his contract. They are still paying him. So, what's the basis for a lawsuit? Suing LSU for a potential breach of contract that could happen or could not happen as you are working through negotiations is purely a PR move.
Posted by Havoc
Member since Nov 2015
37127 posts
Posted on 11/11/25 at 8:33 am to
quote:

Then he’s going to petition the judge to force LSU to put the entire $52 million into escrow because he and Kelly do not have faith that they will see the payments out over 6 years and LSU has demonstrated a lack of trustworthiness

I don’t know who is more retarded, you or the retards taking what you post as fact.
There is no contractual basis for forcing lump sum payment.
Posted by bdavids09
Member since Jun 2017
1309 posts
Posted on 11/11/25 at 8:35 am to
Agree. Just move on. Not worth it dragging this shite out
Posted by RB10
Member since Nov 2010
49766 posts
Posted on 11/11/25 at 8:36 am to
Agreed. Just give him his 6 year payout and hope he gets another job to offset.

Stop with the lump sum since he’s already turned it down.
Posted by Chalkywhite84
New orleans
Member since Dec 2016
33087 posts
Posted on 11/11/25 at 8:36 am to
quote:

BK is a retard to not take a settlement with large up front payments and erase the look for a job clause.

So be it though pay him monthly for 6 years and let’s see if he holds up his end looking for a job. Once he doesn’t the payments stop


This is where I'm at.
This post was edited on 11/11/25 at 9:48 am
Posted by Chalkywhite84
New orleans
Member since Dec 2016
33087 posts
Posted on 11/11/25 at 8:38 am to
quote:

LSU is going to frick around and end up having to pay him full freight all at once. His lawyer is going to go in front of a judge and pretty easily prove he was in fact fired. Then he’s going to show video of King Cajuns press conference. Then he’s going to petition the judge to force LSU to put the entire $52 million into escrow because he and Kelly do not have faith that they will see the payments out over 6 years and LSU has demonstrated a lack of trustworthiness


No. Cause lsu is still paying him the 800k monthly. No judge will make them put that money in escrow.
Posted by WiscyTiger
Bear Lake, WI
Member since Nov 2008
1421 posts
Posted on 11/11/25 at 9:37 am to
quote:

There is no contractual basis for forcing lump sum payment.


This. It will settle. The sky is not falling. Don’t pay him $48M+. Pay him $30-40ish. It’s called settlement negotiations.

BK is a bitch for checking out on his team, suing us, and not wanting to have to work again for a new team. frick him.
Posted by Macavity92
Member since Dec 2004
6214 posts
Posted on 11/11/25 at 11:06 am to
quote:

It sounds like Kelly has no aspirations of coaching again because why else would you choose payments over 6 years over a lump sum?


His lawyers filed the suit for leverage. In the end, BK probably will take a lump sum settlement, just not the sub $30m that LSU wanted.

Anything that happens between BK and LSU from here on out is for leverage, pure and simple. Trying to publicly give LSU a black eye is part of that.

Given that the contract requires BK to make good faith efforts to find a new job commensurate with his skill the level the only real issue before the judge is whether he was fired with or without case. With cause firing reasons are set forth in the contract.

If this case ends, and BK wins, LSU can file suit a year or two later and seek a reduction in payments because of BK's lack of good faith in seeking a new job. Given that, and the length of the buyout, it will probably settle sometime before the summer.
Posted by HeartAttackTiger
Member since Sep 2009
537 posts
Posted on 11/11/25 at 11:13 am to
quote:

It was a bad hire and a worse contract. Pay this prick his money and be done with it. Wash your hands of the whole tenure. Woodward is gone amd we have to clean this mess up.


It's that simple!
Posted by jdd48
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2012
23350 posts
Posted on 11/11/25 at 11:15 am to
quote:

No. When you fire a coach, you go to war. You go after them for anything and all things they have ever done in their lives. You go after their friends, you go after their family. You do whatever it takes to ensure that person cannot ever hold a job ever again. This is war and we are LSU. If you dare to coach here, then you dare to accept the consequences if you fail.


I don't think your position is quite extreme enough.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram