- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Pass Interference No-Calls
Posted on 9/2/13 at 9:35 am
Posted on 9/2/13 at 9:35 am
Was it my imagination & partisanship, or did TCU get the benefit of an inordinate number of pass-interference no-calls Saturday night?
14
Posted on 9/2/13 at 9:36 am to chasseur4
Yes, and you need a new Pope picture...
Posted on 9/2/13 at 9:36 am to chasseur4
About three times imo
Posted on 9/2/13 at 9:37 am to chasseur4
The no-call on the block in the back was much more egregious.
Posted on 9/2/13 at 9:37 am to chasseur4
Early and often
Posted on 9/2/13 at 9:38 am to tigerfan in bamaland
That physical play from their corners will help us.
Posted on 9/2/13 at 9:38 am to chasseur4
Landry scored a TD on one.
Posted on 9/2/13 at 9:38 am to Placebeaux
If it is against the rules to wrap your arm around a receivers waist then that alone was pass interference.
Posted on 9/2/13 at 9:39 am to chasseur4
Both PIs in the end zone were obvious. Mett got robbed of 2 TDs.
Posted on 9/2/13 at 9:39 am to tigerfan in bamaland
Yeah they were letting them play otherwise we would have been flagged for a push-off on a catch. Don't recall who our WR was, but at least they intended to call it balanced. TCU just took advantage of it more I guess.
Posted on 9/2/13 at 9:39 am to Placebeaux
Refs definitely let them play last Sat. I do think they were fair about it however it did benefit TCU imo bc they were at such a physical disadvantage. If they would have called offensive holding, there would have been 3 calls on the OT blocking Allen on the 1st possession. They finally did call him on the INT but only bc he literally tackled him in order to prevent a sack.
Posted on 9/2/13 at 9:40 am to chasseur4
On the first trip to the red zone there was an iffy one that could have gone either way.
The second trip to the red zone after the kick-off fumble recovery there was a blatant one that prevented a touchdown. That was really the only one I was upset about.
The second trip to the red zone after the kick-off fumble recovery there was a blatant one that prevented a touchdown. That was really the only one I was upset about.
Posted on 9/2/13 at 9:42 am to chasseur4
For the most part, I thought it was pretty evenly called. The refs were letting the DBs play with their hands. That shite happens every Sunday and the refs let us get away with it too. They simply let the DBs play.
The one case where I was like, "wow", was the Landry TD. Even though it worked out well for us, that was more than just hand checking. Landry was mugged on that play, but was still able to come up with the ball and turn up field.
The one case where I was like, "wow", was the Landry TD. Even though it worked out well for us, that was more than just hand checking. Landry was mugged on that play, but was still able to come up with the ball and turn up field.
Posted on 9/2/13 at 9:52 am to touchdownjeebus
quote:
The one case where I was like, "wow", was the Landry TD. Even though it worked out well for us, that was more than just hand checking. Landry was mugged on that play, but was still able to come up with the ball and turn up field.
I actually think the defender helped him score the TD bc he spun JL around and made it easier for him to get up the field
Posted on 9/2/13 at 9:54 am to chasseur4
I was more upset with a blatant hold/tackle on I believe rasco on TCU's first drive. I need to watch the replay because espn never showed a replay.
Posted on 9/2/13 at 9:55 am to STEVED00
Some bad TCU OL holding calls were let go. This was not balanced. Thee DB's I agree they let play.
Posted on 9/2/13 at 10:00 am to touchdownjeebus
The DB's had their opposite hand wrapped around the waist of the receivers.
That gets flagged all day long in the NFL.
That gets flagged all day long in the NFL.
Posted on 9/2/13 at 10:01 am to TexasTiger1185
quote:Of course it would have been declined, but that one was the worst. Major incompetence to not see/call that one on the refs part.
Landry scored a TD on one.
Posted on 9/2/13 at 10:01 am to Tiger_n_ATL
quote:
Some bad TCU OL holding calls were let go.
I think they were just letting a lot go which favored TCU (bc we are a superior physical team). Our OL didn't rally need to hold but if they would have then I believe they would have let it go until unless it was egregious (Allen hold on INT). Our DBs (our prob our coaches) realized this quick and definitely became more physical with the TCU WRs
Posted on 9/2/13 at 10:11 am to STEVED00
Hope no one was bothered by those calls. Slive and Steve Shaw offered them all jobs after the game. Better pay, and never have to leave the state of Alabama.
Page 1 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News