Started By
Message

re: Opting out is not the problem...it's the symptom...

Posted on 12/27/22 at 11:39 am to
Posted by SammyTiger
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2009
78199 posts
Posted on 12/27/22 at 11:39 am to
quote:

They only don’t mean anything because of the playoff and it’s only going to get worse.


What did they mean before the playoff?

Before the playoffs there was a Championship game

Before the championship game there was maybe 2-3 teams who could move the needle to win a NC

Before that bowls literally meant nothing.
This post was edited on 12/27/22 at 11:45 am
Posted by Dizz
Member since May 2008
15952 posts
Posted on 12/27/22 at 11:59 am to
quote:

again, nobody has answered what has caused that shift though.



I think it was always suspected that GM's would not care if someone didn't play in a bowl but there was still an unknown of "what if they do". With McCaffrey and Fourntette the curtain began to get pulled back on that answer being, no they don't. 2020 removed the uncertainty that missing a bowl game could hurt draft stock.
Posted by TX Tiger
at home
Member since Jan 2004
37663 posts
Posted on 12/27/22 at 12:07 pm to
quote:

We've gone full circle back to the bowls just being exhibition games.
And how many opted out back then?
Posted by MikeTheTiger71
Member since Dec 2021
4260 posts
Posted on 12/27/22 at 12:22 pm to
quote:

2020 removed the uncertainty that missing a bowl game could hurt draft stock.


Exactly. COVID opt-outs were the last step in normalizing sitting out games and demonstrating that it would not hurt draft positioning.
Posted by Dizz
Member since May 2008
15952 posts
Posted on 12/27/22 at 12:37 pm to
It was heading that direction regardless Covid just accelerated it.
Posted by Gray Tiger
Prairieville, LA
Member since Jan 2004
36512 posts
Posted on 12/27/22 at 12:38 pm to
quote:

sidewalkside






This is stupid "logic". There aren't "too many bowl games" for any individual athlete. No one plays in more than one.

90%+ of the players in any given bowl have no reasonable shot at the NFL. For many this is the final game of a career that started with pee-wee ball. I will guarantee you that these "meaningless" games mean something to those playing their final game.

Opting out is a personal, business decision to leave your college loyalties behind and move on. So if your favorite player decided to say fuk you to his teammates, it's his call. If you don't like it, you aren't requires to watch.
Posted by Falco
Member since Dec 2018
2216 posts
Posted on 12/27/22 at 1:05 pm to
Bowl games outside of the playoffs have become and exhibition games
Posted by MikeTheTiger71
Member since Dec 2021
4260 posts
Posted on 12/27/22 at 1:05 pm to
quote:

It was heading that direction regardless Covid just accelerated it.


Yes, agreed. That’s what I meant by it being the last step. It just opened up the floodgates so much so that people act now like this has been the norm for a long time. It’s really just the last 2-3 years.
Posted by LSUfan4444
Member since Mar 2004
56623 posts
Posted on 12/27/22 at 1:17 pm to
quote:

What did they mean before the playoff?


They meant alot..to the schools, fans and players which is why they didnt have opt outs

Whether they meany anything to you or not isnt really relevant. Since the CFP bowl merchandise sales are down, TV viewership is down, opt outs are up, ticket sales are down.
Posted by keakar
Member since Jan 2017
30152 posts
Posted on 12/27/22 at 1:47 pm to
quote:

The real problem is there are too many bowl games that don't mean anything.


100% agree

teams should be required to have no less than 8 wins to play in a bowl.

dont have enough teams for all the bowls, no problem, just move down to lower tiered schools that have 8 wins

thats how you fix these boring unwatchable bowl games with 5 and 6 win teams
Posted by MikeTheTiger71
Member since Dec 2021
4260 posts
Posted on 12/27/22 at 1:47 pm to
quote:

Whether they meany anything to you or not isnt really relevant. Since the CFP bowl merchandise sales are down, TV viewership is down, opt outs are up, ticket sales are down.


There are so many other factors at play, there’s no way you can make such a sweeping generalization and attribute all those things to the CFP, especially when many of those dynamics have really only occurred post-COVID. There were a few opt outs in the early days of the CFP, but it’s only exploded in last couple of years. Much of that momentum isn’t even just draft opt outs. Much of it is a product of the early signing period and the transfer portal window creating a flood of players entering the portal before the bowls. That has only provided greater cover for players declaring for the draft. Altogether it becomes a self-fulfilling feedback loop.
Posted by SammyTiger
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2009
78199 posts
Posted on 12/27/22 at 3:17 pm to
quote:

They meant alot..to the schools, fans and players which is why they didnt have opt outs


They meant nothing. Players just hadn’t caught on to that yet.

They literally used to name NCs before the bowls.
Posted by Lsudave89
Baton Rouge, Louisiana.
Member since Jun 2021
3527 posts
Posted on 12/27/22 at 3:32 pm to
quote:

risk vs reward. For players who are going to the NFL, they could raise their draft stock much more by training and having a good combine vs having a good bowl game. There is basically no benefit to them playing in some of these games. Other players, who are young and need experience, there is still a benefit.


Agreed. Maybe a little different take but 41 bowls or 82 teams. Obviously most non- significant to general public, casual fans. BUT to teams like New Mexico State that played us and got beat up, school hasn't played in a bowl for 60 years and had to appeal just to get in.

I will bet it means alot to these players, athletic programs, etc...
Posted by LSUmudman
Abita Springs
Member since Aug 2015
1759 posts
Posted on 12/27/22 at 3:42 pm to
Coaching staffs will no longer be able to “build a program”…….it will be year to year…..every year. The only Coach I know so far to have success in the new deal is Brian Kelly.
Posted by GeorgeWest
Baton Rouge
Member since Nov 2013
14728 posts
Posted on 12/27/22 at 3:51 pm to
My wife and I attended all 4 Citrus Bowls LSU has played in, 2004 to 2017. In each succeeding game after 2004 LSU had fewer fans attending and the overall actual attendance decreased. And the Citrus has been considered a good bowl in each of those years.

Note: we have opted out of this year's bowl in terms of attendning.
Posted by EvrybodysAllAmerican
Member since Apr 2013
12631 posts
Posted on 12/27/22 at 4:17 pm to
quote:

And how many opted out back then?


Entire teams would opt out some years, and it was treated more as a vacation by players and coaches.
This post was edited on 12/27/22 at 4:18 pm
Posted by MikeTheTiger71
Member since Dec 2021
4260 posts
Posted on 12/27/22 at 5:00 pm to
quote:

My wife and I attended all 4 Citrus Bowls LSU has played in, 2004 to 2017. In each succeeding game after 2004 LSU had fewer fans attending and the overall actual attendance decreased.


I think this says more about the enthusiasm fans felt about the direction of the program and the degree to which they had become spoiled by success than it does about the inherent meaning attached to bowl games in a generic sense.
Posted by atltiger6487
Member since May 2011
19731 posts
Posted on 12/27/22 at 5:28 pm to
quote:

BUT to teams like New Mexico State that played us and got beat up, school hasn't played in a bowl for 60 years and had to appeal just to get in. I will bet it means alot to these players, athletic programs, etc
i hear you, but making a bowl nowadays, when 82 out of 131 teams go bowling, isn’t such a great accomplishment.

It was a big deal 40 years ago when there were only 15 or so bowls.

But now that it’s so diluted, going to a bowl is barely an accomplishment at all. And that’s not a shot at New Mexico State, just a mathematical fact.
Posted by Dizz
Member since May 2008
15952 posts
Posted on 12/27/22 at 6:08 pm to
Having fewer bowls isn’t going to make draft eligible guys suddenly stay because they get to play in the Gator Bowl. .500 teams getting in has no effect on how people feel about the bigger bowl games.
Posted by Mikethegreattiger
Member since May 2021
177 posts
Posted on 12/27/22 at 8:05 pm to
What is? Now you will have players opting out on meaningless games after losing 3 or 4 games early in the season. I guess it is a business decision. They will get ready for draft and us fans who paid good money for a great team to watch gets the finger.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram