- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: NCAA Appeals Trinidad Chambliss Decision
Posted on 3/5/26 at 3:36 pm to Tiger2025
Posted on 3/5/26 at 3:36 pm to Tiger2025
NCAA is about to crack down on a lot of things. The Joey Aguilar ruling was the first step in NCAA regaining their control. I said it after the semi-final game and I'll say it again. Chambliss should have gone pro, this is a weaker QB class and would likely have been QB2 or QB3 and could have potentially gotten himself into the top 2 rounds. Now he is going to get denied another year and will be too late in getting drafted so he will have to take a Free Agency deal thus losing himself $.
Posted on 3/5/26 at 3:53 pm to Tiger2025
Could they not have also requested an immediate injunction to prevent his playing until a ruling was made ? This would have placed more power in their hands.
Posted on 3/5/26 at 4:00 pm to friendlyobservation
quote:you do realize that universities are members of the NCAA, and about 96% of the NCAA's total revenue is returned to members, used for student-athlete programs, or for championships.
Yeah, simple. NCAA shouldn't exist. That's your answer. They do nothing to exist other than put their hand in the cookie jar and screw everything they can up. They have no power or teeth to do anything other than make the sport worse. They're going to lose this appeal but it's just another last breath effort for the NCAA to hold onto existing to make $$$ and continue to screw the sport over.
Recent court rulings have neutered the NCAA, so now who do you want to set rules for college sports?
Each individual school makes their own rules? Each conference?
You have to have SOME entity that oversees things and makes and enforces regulations governing each sport. If it's not the NCAA, it has to be something. Saban and others are pushing for a commission for football.
You can't just have no guardrails at all. That's chaos (which is close to where we are now).
Posted on 3/5/26 at 4:02 pm to bwallcubfan
quote:
Does the Mississippi Supreme Court also have ole Miss alumni?
6 of the 7 Judges are Ole Miss grads
Posted on 3/5/26 at 4:08 pm to LSUnKaty
Memory failing with age but I think I read back when the initial appeal was approved that the next appeal (NCAA's) would potentially be resolved after the NFL draft. Which would seriously hurt his chances of making the roster of any League roster. Thus the evaluation of his agent's decision as horrible.
Posted on 3/5/26 at 4:25 pm to Robcrzy
quote:
They are saying some crooked alumni judge shouldn’t make eligibility decisions for the ncaa?
Exactly. Good on Tennessee's judge for doing the appropriate thing in his ruling.
Posted on 3/5/26 at 4:25 pm to Choupique19
quote:
Ole Miss filed a lawsuit against the NCAA in Judge Goober's jurisdiction. Judge Goober is an Ole Miss grad and couldn't hold back his excitement that he got the chance to rule the Ole Miss quarterback eligible to come back and play his 5th season. The NCAA didn't even pay attention to Judge Goober because it was known before the trial that the Hotty Toddy Judge was going to rule in favor of his RebelBear football team.
It's disgusting this was even allowed.
Posted on 3/5/26 at 4:32 pm to Tiger2025
Chambliss loses this case in front of any appellate court not in Mississippi. This was an administrative decision by the NCAA. Courts are not allowed to disturb a ruling by an administrator in cases like this absent clear, overwhelming and convincing proof that the administrator acted arbitrarily or in bad faith.
It’s an almost impossible burden in a case like this. The NCAA has supported its decision with mounds of documentation that would support a conclusion that Chambliss did not miss time due to injury, but rather that he was a developmental player. A judge cannot overturn an administrative decision just because he disagrees with it or thinks it’s wrong. The judge must find the decision arbitrary and this decision clearly was not.
The lower court judge who granted the injunction incredulously found that the eligibility committee acted in bad faith. I think he also tossed in some really stretched contract theory, maybe because he knows how loathe courts are to overturn administrative decisions.
Mississippi Supreme Court judges are elected. To my knowledge, most or all of them are Ole Miss alums. Thats really the only chance Chambliss has, that the judges ignore the law and substitute their opinion for the opinion of the administrator under some bad faith theory.
I suppose the NCAA could take a writ to the US Supreme Court if that happens. It’s not the type of case the US Supreme Court would usually entertain. Legally, Chambliss has a very weak case. But this is Ole Miss football. What judge wants to be tarred and feathered and carried on a pole through the grove?
It’s an almost impossible burden in a case like this. The NCAA has supported its decision with mounds of documentation that would support a conclusion that Chambliss did not miss time due to injury, but rather that he was a developmental player. A judge cannot overturn an administrative decision just because he disagrees with it or thinks it’s wrong. The judge must find the decision arbitrary and this decision clearly was not.
The lower court judge who granted the injunction incredulously found that the eligibility committee acted in bad faith. I think he also tossed in some really stretched contract theory, maybe because he knows how loathe courts are to overturn administrative decisions.
Mississippi Supreme Court judges are elected. To my knowledge, most or all of them are Ole Miss alums. Thats really the only chance Chambliss has, that the judges ignore the law and substitute their opinion for the opinion of the administrator under some bad faith theory.
I suppose the NCAA could take a writ to the US Supreme Court if that happens. It’s not the type of case the US Supreme Court would usually entertain. Legally, Chambliss has a very weak case. But this is Ole Miss football. What judge wants to be tarred and feathered and carried on a pole through the grove?
Posted on 3/5/26 at 4:34 pm to Tiger2025
Essentially their appeal is saying rulings like this mean the NCAA has no power and that college football is essentially run by district courts
which of present is true
which of present is true
This post was edited on 3/5/26 at 4:35 pm
Posted on 3/5/26 at 4:46 pm to RB10
quote:
Did you forget that the NCAA manages a lot more than just football?
Me thinks he forgot that the NCAA is made up of the schools themselves…..
Perhaps he would better off thinking “NCAA participating schools” rather than NCAA.
Posted on 3/5/26 at 4:48 pm to paper tiger
quote:
Chambliss loses this case in front of any appellate court not in Mississippi. This was an administrative decision by the NCAA. Courts are not allowed to disturb a ruling by an administrator in cases like this absent clear, overwhelming and convincing proof that the administrator acted arbitrarily or in bad faith.
This!!
Also, I might add, any court that allows Student-athletes to remain in school for an infinite amount of time, is impeding athletes who are coming behind them from “the expectation of being paid”.
Posted on 3/5/26 at 5:03 pm to Tiger2025
I just dont understand this kid's decision to stay.
He has nothing to gain and everything to lose if plays another year of college football. The only way it wouldve made sense is if he came back to play in the same system.
Your entire Offensive staff that molded you is gone and 5 of your top 6 pass catchers are gone.
He has nothing to gain and everything to lose if plays another year of college football. The only way it wouldve made sense is if he came back to play in the same system.
Your entire Offensive staff that molded you is gone and 5 of your top 6 pass catchers are gone.
Posted on 3/5/26 at 5:22 pm to LSUnKaty
I think he can play until this runs its course, but might they forfeit wins if he plays and the NCAA eventually wins?
This post was edited on 3/5/26 at 5:35 pm
Posted on 3/5/26 at 5:37 pm to Tiger2025
Didn’t he already finish school? Is this like that Miami dude that hadn’t gone to any classes in two years? What a friggin joke “college” football has become.
Posted on 3/5/26 at 5:45 pm to Keltic Tiger
Surely he got his NIL money up front. If not, everybody involved should get sued if the NCAA prevails.
Posted on 3/5/26 at 5:48 pm to ThePoo
Really puts a target on them with the tampering investigation. This could be a pissing match to the school and the judge.
Posted on 3/5/26 at 6:17 pm to Tiger2025
I assume decision will not be until after draft. If he is ruled ineligible, does he just have to wait until next year’s draft?
Posted on 3/5/26 at 6:23 pm to nicholastiger
quote:
dude should have just went into the draft
I think he can still go to a supplemental draft if he is booted out. However, that does not come with the guaranteed money and signing bonuses the draft does.
Posted on 3/5/26 at 6:51 pm to atltiger6487
Yes, it's already chaos. The NCAA is useless and their "rules/regulations" put into place handicap the sport as it is. You see it time and time again like transfers or timing like you saw in Lane's situation. All they do is put obstacles in front with no solutions. Saban is 100% right on what it should be doing. The NCAA as itself as an entity is completely useless. It's moving towards power conferences running everything anyway, which it partially already is between Big 10/SEC. Saban's perspective is the right way to do it.
This post was edited on 3/5/26 at 6:52 pm
Popular
Back to top


1



