Started By
Message

re: McMahon quote after Texas Tech loss

Posted on 12/11/25 at 10:00 am to
Posted by mcspufftiger7
Member since Oct 2020
3158 posts
Posted on 12/11/25 at 10:00 am to
I watch a lot of basketball and not just LSU. We have not had the talent of other schools i don't care what the rankings say. We did not have an SEC caliber PG last year. Collins and Chest were good rim defenders but useless on offense as Chest is showing again this year. No post presence whatsoever.he was without Reed one of his most important players on that team. Yet with that lack of talent was in most of the games late against ranked SEC teams. Didn't have a single player that would have been even close to all SEC on that roster. This year we have an SEC caliber PG and we have post presence with Nwoko and Miller. We have a FW in Sutton that can shoot outside and drive to the basket .If someone can step up and be a consistent 3 point shooter they have a shot.
Posted by Alt26
Member since Mar 2010
34108 posts
Posted on 12/11/25 at 10:43 am to
quote:

I watch a lot of basketball and not just LSU. We have not had the talent of other schools


Is it possible that the players aren't that bad but they are just being poorly coached.

LSU just fired a football coach who was underperforming with what was thought to be a really talented team. Maybe all of those players WERE just really bad. Or maybe Kelly should have consulted with McMahon to figure out the secret to producing unsatisfactory results yet never being blamed for them.

quote:

i don't care what the rankings say.


Yet, the rankings seem to matter in April, May, June as the basis for saying, every offseason "this is going to be McMahon's best team"...only for the season to happen and those talented players in the spring suddenly turn into no talent bums.

Including this year, LSU will have had nearly 40 different players play for the program over the last 4 years. Yet, somehow the rankings that every year put LSU's roster within the middle of the SEC are always horribly wrong at the end of the season.

Perhaps when trying to diagnose the root cause of a problem it's more likely the one constant could be the root cause rather than the 40 different variables.
Posted by mcspufftiger7
Member since Oct 2020
3158 posts
Posted on 12/11/25 at 10:45 am to
Well if that's the case then he will be gone after this season. We shall see. But I don't see Mcmahon leaving NCST to go back to LSU.
Posted by Madking
Member since Apr 2016
66283 posts
Posted on 12/11/25 at 10:54 am to
Appointing yourself as the arbiter of truth isn’t a real argument
Posted by drizztiger
Deal With it!
Member since Mar 2007
44898 posts
Posted on 12/11/25 at 11:05 am to
quote:

But I don't see Mcmahon leaving NCST to go back to LSU.
Me neither.

He'd have to get to Raleigh first.
Posted by Tom Bronco
Austin, TX
Member since Jun 2011
2862 posts
Posted on 12/11/25 at 11:54 am to
Yes, once again we are told we have players recruited for their shooting and outside shooting won't be a problem this year. And yet it is? How can we consistently get guys that can't shoot consistently? Last year it was Sears who came in with a career over 50% from three and shot less than 30% with us. Only Carter was over 30% and our only consistent shooter. This year it is McKinnon in a seemingly endless slump and sinking lower ever game. We don't coach players up, we give them a place to come and fail. King doesn't even attempt many shots when he comes in. Why are all our shooters so timid and afraid to shoot? Time and time again we see them pass up relatively good shots, until late in the shot clock we shoot a desperation one. Even our big men under the basket hesitate before going straight up for a shot or dunk?
Posted by Madking
Member since Apr 2016
66283 posts
Posted on 12/11/25 at 12:02 pm to
The offense we run doesn’t produce open looks or threaten a defense at any particular spot on the floor so our guys have to work extremely hard to score. If we don’t bury a quick shot off the first action everything else becomes incredibly taxing individually because there’s no secondary action or schematic threat. Opposing defenders have it pretty easy vs us.
Posted by jamarr
Member since Jul 2019
1194 posts
Posted on 12/11/25 at 12:05 pm to
quote:

The offense we run doesn’t produce


88 points per game average
Posted by Tiger Ugly
Baton Rouge
Member since Jul 2008
17697 posts
Posted on 12/11/25 at 12:06 pm to
quote:

I watch a lot of basketball and not just LSU. We have not had the talent of other schools i don't care what the rankings say.


So are you saying we have not had the talent of "All" other SEC School? "Most" other SEC schools? if Most how many of the other 15? Do you think we finished the last 3 years in the SEC standings in direct correlation with our talent level?
Posted by jamarr
Member since Jul 2019
1194 posts
Posted on 12/11/25 at 12:09 pm to
quote:

Time and time again we see them pass up relatively good shots, until late in the shot clock we shoot a desperation one. Even our big men under the basket hesitate before going straight up for a shot or dunk?


nwoko is very aggressive and shoots and makes baskets aggressively. he never hesitates and is incredibly reliable from down low.

the last two games the team has found plenty of open shots and taken missed them. they have only shot desperation shots one of two times.

they have been missing open shots. the offense is running fine to create shots. just have been missing them. but really only for two games. no reason they wont start making them.
Posted by Circle K Beggar
Somewhere in the lower 48
Member since Feb 2011
7391 posts
Posted on 12/11/25 at 12:55 pm to
quote:

88 points per game average


Against the Little Sisters of the Poor.

First team they played with a pulse BLEW THEM OUT (and that will be a preview of coming attractions)
Posted by ROUSTER
Member since Sep 2003
7088 posts
Posted on 12/11/25 at 1:05 pm to
Let's see how they perform with a week off (after getting butt screwed by TTU) against a solid opponent.
We've struggled to make shots the last 2 games for sure. Somebody has to step up and make the open looks that Thomas provides. We also need Miller to grow up and get better quickly so Nwoko has some help.
Thomas, Nwoko, and Sutton are solid players, but we need 2 or 3 more guys to really step up their game.

I'm hoping for a much more competitive game against SMU.
Posted by Madking
Member since Apr 2016
66283 posts
Posted on 12/11/25 at 1:16 pm to
Against HS teams, 68ppg vs P5 teams and one was an overtime game.
Posted by Alt26
Member since Mar 2010
34108 posts
Posted on 12/11/25 at 1:18 pm to
quote:

Let's see how they perform with a week off (after getting butt screwed by TTU) against a solid opponent.


This will be SMU's fourth SEC game in a row.

W @ Miss. St 87-81 (OT)
L @ Vandy 88-60
W (N) vs. A&M 93-80 (OT)


If the assumption (hope?) is that LSU is a mid-tier SEC team, then SMU is probably a comparable team to such group. The transitive property is not always correct, but if LSU struggles in this game there will be cause for MAJOR concern.

In the last two games LSU looked like they didn't belong on the same court with Texas Tech and their "gritty" win @ BC continues to look worse. BC is a BAD team. Maybe the worst in the ACC. They followed up the LSU loss by having to overcome a 10 point deficit to beat the University of New Haven, a team in only its second year in D1 and losing to UMass.

If this team is actually any good tomorrow would be a good time to show it.
Posted by KamaCausey_LSU
Member since Apr 2013
17117 posts
Posted on 12/11/25 at 1:25 pm to
quote:

Yet with that lack of talent was in most of the games late against ranked SEC teams
Not sure which games you watched.

Tl;dr
LSU was within 1 possession late in the game only 5 SEC games last season. fricking pathetic.

Here is a list detailing the closest LSU was with <5 minutes left by SEC game.

vs Vandy - down 3 with 3:24 left (lost by 8)
@ Mizzou - down 13 with 1:28 left (lost by 16)
@ Ole Miss - down 12 at the end of the game
vs Arkansas - Win, held the lead from 9:46 on. Won by 4.
@ A&M - down 8 with 1:30 left (lost by 11)
@ Bama - down 5 with 3:56 left (lost by 7).
vs Auburn - down 9 with 3:48 (lost by 13)
vs Texas - down 23 with 5:00 left (lost by 31)
@ Georgia - down 13 with 3:01 left (lost by 19)
vs Ole Miss - UP 11 points with 3:15 left, which was also the last time LSU scored in this game (lost by 2)
@Arkansas - down 8 with 4:52 left (lost by 12)
@OU - Win, took the lead with 8 seconds left. Won by 3.
vs USC - Win, largest lead was 20 (Won by 14)
vs Florida - Down 4 at the 5:00 mark. Made it a 4 point game at 5:58, didn't score again until 1:56 (lost by 14) - not giving credit for this one.
vs Tenn - down 5 with 0:12 left (lost by 6). Was a 10 point game with 1:00.
@MSU - down 7 with 4:20 (lost by 12). Only scored 3 points in the final 4:20.
@UK - nope (lost by 31, closest was at the end)
vs A&M - down 10 with 3:12 left (lost by 14)

SEC Tourney:
vs MSU - down 29 at 2:52 (lost by 29)


Depends on your definition of competitive. In only 8 SEC games last was LSU within 2 possession in the final 5:00. vs Vandy (down 3), vs Arkansas (won by 4), @Bama (down 5), vs Ole Miss (up 11, lost), @OU (won by 3), vs USC (won by 14), vs Florida (down 4), and vs Tenn (down 5).

Posted by mcspufftiger7
Member since Oct 2020
3158 posts
Posted on 12/11/25 at 1:40 pm to
LOL. So you left out some games because you wanted to? LSU was absolutely competitive in a lot of those games with NO SEC PG. No Reed. And no bigs that can shoot. And lousy 3 pt shooting. If Mcmahon sucked as a coach they would have lost those games by 20 - 30 pts with that roster. That was literally one of the best SEC conferences of all time. If Texas tech doesn't shoot 70% from 3 in first half and LSU doesn't shoot 16% you probably get more of what you saw in the second half which was a 34-32 game. It was what it was. If they repeat against SMU saturday then I'm on board to get rid of him. If they win or at least take it to the buzzer with a loss I will continue to support until we get a few SEC games in and see where we stand.
Posted by Madking
Member since Apr 2016
66283 posts
Posted on 12/11/25 at 1:46 pm to
You don’t get it, he can lose every game as long as it’s not 30 point losses. Only then can he be considered not good.
Posted by mcspufftiger7
Member since Oct 2020
3158 posts
Posted on 12/11/25 at 1:52 pm to
No. I have said he has to win this year or he's gone. My life doesn't depend on what LSU sports do so I don't care if they give him 4 years to do it just financially support the program equal to what everyone else is. That has not been the case the previous 3 years. They stepped it up this year and he needs to respond. Simple as that.
Posted by drizztiger
Deal With it!
Member since Mar 2007
44898 posts
Posted on 12/11/25 at 1:53 pm to
If a game was within 12 with 8:00 minutes left, LSU was close to winning. Just got a couple bad bounces.
Posted by Madking
Member since Apr 2016
66283 posts
Posted on 12/11/25 at 1:53 pm to
Yea that’s just not true
Jump to page
Page First 6 7 8 9 10 ... 14
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 8 of 14Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram