- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Maybe it's the school, not the coach. Wisconsin D is dominating.
Posted on 10/6/19 at 11:26 am to H-Town Tiger
Posted on 10/6/19 at 11:26 am to H-Town Tiger
quote:
i really wish i could figure out why there is this push to discredit Aranda.
I’ve wondered about this too. It’s very strange.
Could it be that Aranda has informed LSU he is taking a head coaching gig somewhere after this year and all this is more Ponamski propaganda being pushed to get a “we really didn’t need Aranda anyway” message floating out there?
I can’t make sense of it any other way.
Posted on 10/6/19 at 11:27 am to HubbaBubba
Maybe it is their opposition.
Posted on 10/6/19 at 11:27 am to J2thaROC
Wisconsin hasn’t faced a team with an offensive pulse all season. They play a bunch of plodding big 10 teams who still play like a les miles wet dream.
Michigan and Iowa both have white receivers and running backs for Christ sakes. Let me know when Wisconsin shuts down Ohio state
Michigan and Iowa both have white receivers and running backs for Christ sakes. Let me know when Wisconsin shuts down Ohio state
Posted on 10/6/19 at 11:28 am to HubbaBubba
wisconsin would not have a dominate d in the SEC regardless
get back to us when they play ohio st
aranda was great before wisconsin btw.
get back to us when they play ohio st
aranda was great before wisconsin btw.
This post was edited on 10/6/19 at 11:29 am
Posted on 10/6/19 at 11:28 am to LSUTigers00884
quote:
Wisconsin
By far and away my favorite Big 10 team
Posted on 10/6/19 at 11:40 am to H-Town Tiger
quote:
i really wish i could figure out why there is this push to discredit Aranda
I'm not sure that's the case here. Why do some fear honest analysis? None of this indicates Aranda isn't a top DC.
There are some that take unfair shots at Aranda to cover the offense's past shortcomings and lately there's been a rush to put some of the D's struggles on our now uptempo, high scoring offense. What were considered "excuses" for the offense previously are now "explanations" for the defenses' issues this season.
Aranda is a very good DC and historically his defenses improve as the season progresses. The D will be OK. We got glimpses of it coming together yesterday. We also need Chaisson to get healthy and be the player he's projected to be.
Posted on 10/6/19 at 11:42 am to HubbaBubba
Schools don’t just produce good defenses despite coaching. That’s not how it works. Wisconsin just made a good hire and kept things rolling defensively after Aranda left.
Posted on 10/6/19 at 11:53 am to BayouCowboy
quote:
Why do some fear honest analysis?
There is a difference between honest analysis and gratuitous bashing much of what I’ve seen falls in the later category. The defense got torched in the 2nd half vs Texas, shite happens. There were a couple lapses vs Vandy but nothing worth melting over like many here did. It’s also fun that when O was being roasted for losses to Troy and MSU a couple years ago, the lack of DL depth was trotted out and blame cast on Miles but this year DL injuries are waved away as excuses go figure
Posted on 10/6/19 at 11:59 am to tigerfan88
quote:
Let me know when Wisconsin shuts down Ohio state
Correct. Never forget the 2014 Wisconsin defense with Dave Aranda were statistically very good until...they faced tOSU in the Big Ten championship game and gave up 59 points and 250 rushing yards to zeke.
Posted on 10/6/19 at 12:12 pm to HubbaBubba
quote:
The stats as I applied them say, "yes".
If you go off stats alone and only stats, then your answer is obviously correct. But in all reality if you aren’t number 1 in your stats department, got news for you, statically they all could improve, even number 1 can improve their stats. So without putting context behind the text you are actually wrong in your comparisons, not in your statistics but in your comparisons!
And here is why, because you can take all the stats you want and compare them team to team in order to compare which Coach’s are doing better than other Coach’s. But until you give each coach the same identical team that plays the same identical schedule, you aren’t comparing true Apple to Apple comparisons! Even if you are just taking SEC coaches to try and see within the conference You are comparing apples but different types of apples which have different tastes and uses.
So while your statistical analysis was correct, your comparison analysis fell woefully short!
This post was edited on 10/6/19 at 12:56 pm
Posted on 10/6/19 at 12:23 pm to H-Town Tiger
quote:
There were a couple lapses vs Vandy but nothing worth melting over like many here did
I agree, but UGA and even Ole Miss held Vandy to 6 points. We allowed more points and yards to NW St than a D2 team did. It's a simple fact and not a reason to panic, but obviously the coaches have come out and stated the problems needed to be corrected. So if the coaches say it's an issue, why do you say it's not?
They cleaned it up and looked much better vs USU. I'm glad the coaches didn't say it's all good. Instead they addressed it and shut down a very god offense. That's all most of us expect. See the problem and fix it.
Posted on 10/6/19 at 12:36 pm to BayouCowboy
quote:
None of this indicates Aranda isn't a top DC.
There are people that have said we can go out and get any number of DCs that are just as good as him.
You're insane if you don't see the feeding frenzy that takes place whenever we give up a TD. "This is what we get for $2.5m?" Never fails.
This post was edited on 10/6/19 at 12:39 pm
Posted on 10/6/19 at 12:39 pm to cas4t
People overanalyze everything. The offseason had the same people pushing the same stale points which turned out to be wrong.
This is just more overanalyzing. At the end of the season we will know how good Aranda is, this is way too early to judge this defense.
This is just more overanalyzing. At the end of the season we will know how good Aranda is, this is way too early to judge this defense.
Posted on 10/6/19 at 12:43 pm to Goldrush25
quote:
There are people that have said we can go out and get any number of DCs that are just as good as him.
You're insane if you don't see the feeding frenzy that takes place whenever we give up a TD. "This is what we get for $2.5m?" Never fails.
Oh I agree. A lot of it is the crew that defended O and the offense to a fault. I'm just saying we can be objective. None of the coaches should be put on a pedestal and a fair critique is not "bashing". There's been a weird choosing of sides between the offense and defense and their coaches. I thought they were the same team.
Posted on 10/6/19 at 12:46 pm to Goldrush25
quote:
You're insane if you don't see the feeding frenzy that takes place whenever we give up a TD.
This happens every game regardless of coach or status. It's nothing new and not solely on Aranda. Its just his turn this year.
This fanbase hates everything and everyone. At some point this season Orgeron, Ensminger, Burrow and Brady will get turned on too.
The low IQ element here will make sure of it.
Posted on 10/6/19 at 12:48 pm to Penrod
quote:
Fail! None of this changed since Aranda left.
Actually truth. I did this with Wisconsin fans a year ago. For the most part Wisconsin plays nobody yearly. The reason why they had a poor record last year was because they played the big teams in the conference.
In addition, the offenses they play are routinely mediocre. Go right now and compare the SEC offenses in the same span to Big Ten offenses.
Posted on 10/6/19 at 12:59 pm to arcalades
Yes, that juggernaut offense that is florida
Posted on 10/6/19 at 1:00 pm to HubbaBubba
Maybe Wisconsin plays Les Miles offenses all year every year.
No disrespect meant to Wisconsin, great program, but let’s be real... Big10 offenses (much like many SEC offenses historically) - generally-speaking - just suck.
No disrespect meant to Wisconsin, great program, but let’s be real... Big10 offenses (much like many SEC offenses historically) - generally-speaking - just suck.
This post was edited on 10/6/19 at 1:14 pm
Posted on 10/6/19 at 1:03 pm to JPLSU1981
quote:
Maybe Wisconsin plays Les Miles offenses all year every year.
yep, I was going to say the same thing.
Posted on 10/6/19 at 1:07 pm to RogerTheShrubber
The Big 10 West is very weak offensively and overall. Wisky only rotationally plays tOSU and Penn St which are the better offenses.
Popular
Back to top


0




