J2thaROC

[img]https://c.tenor.com/Xg_nhf2igkwAAAAM/g%C3%A4dda-fiska.gif[/img]...

[quote]I’d switch LB with QB. [/quote] It’s because the south doesn’t run a QB friendly system in high school. Most of them are duel threat QBs who run the ball first and throw occasionally ...

Ole Miss at 4. Lololololol Not with that frickup as head coach....

5th....

[quote]Why don’t people understand this with QB’s? With the transfer portal now more than ever you take a QB EVERY year. There’s too much attrition at the position to say otherwise.[/quote] The very reason you mentioned TO take a QB every year is precisely why it’s not really necessary to take ...

[quote]Looks to me like Top 4 will be Ohio St.,Notre Dame, Alabama, Georgia[/quote] Lol. Notre Dame will not be in the top 5....

[quote]Indeed so lets please stop talking about Packit Curtis. Enjoy freezing your balls off! [/quote] He’s not SEC caliber. Only reason to go to one of those trash schools with no hope of winning a national championship....

[quote]You’re pushing it. BK has a great opportunity to unseat NS as LSU’s greatest coach ever.[/quote]. I get why you say this but is Saban really LSU’s greatest football coach? Yes as far as his total career, he’s without a doubt the best. But as far as career at LSU, Les had the same numbe...

[quote]But his grandpa said roll damn tide….[/quote] If I never hear that stupid arse phrase said again it will be too soon. ...

[quote][LSU can compete with anyone when it comes to this/quote] Yeah no. Not the Cali schools. Sorry but they win hands down and it’s not even close....

Can’t be. I was told we were way behind on the NIL stuff and that we were going to get left behind in football recruiting because of it....

To still go 8-4 every year at best....

[quote]“OH NOES!!! PLAYERS ARE BEING PAID OPENLY NOW! WELL, THATS IT FOR LAU THEN!!!”[/quote] Seriously. Calm the frick down dude. We will end up still in the top 10 on average every year just like we have for the past 20 years....

[quote]The professional leagues self impose a business framework in order to promote the game. That's what I'm proposing here for the NCAA.[/quote] No they don’t. They just pay a fine for paying over the salary cap. The large market teams just pay the fine. It only hurts the smaller teams in...

[quote]we just don’t have the funds to compete with the Texas schools. [/quote] No one except the California schools, the Ivy League schools (but they won’t spend all their money on football since they don’t get the returns on the investment like southern schools do) and Notre Dame do. If...

As long as the OLine and Dline are on point (and rumors are, they will be), the rest you can fill in with good players who don’t have to be the #1 or #2 of their position....

[quote]This is simply a legal way to buy recruits.[/quote] Or for one company to pay market value for what they believe a commodity (player) is worth in an open and free market. Otherwise known as capitalism....

[quote]If True, these type of deals will cause the whole thing to crash. (Hopefully). There needs to be a solid cap with enforcement to bring college football back to where it needs to be. I agree with paying the players, but it should come with caps and restrictions. Otherwise it is minor league NF...

[quote]Get used to it. College football is dead.[/quote] Nope. It’s exactly as it always was. It’s just in the open now. This is capitalism....

[quote] The concern is Texas and A&M. I don't think there's a limit they're willing to go to. I think it means so much that they'll pour their life into buying players. [/quote] And if they become so dominant that other teams have no chance of competing, the viewership will fall tremendously fo...