- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 12/17/15 at 1:03 pm to Pax Regis
Very ambiguous article. I'd like to know precisely what the filings admit. For example, is LSU claiming that Chavis consented to the post-signature amendment? Or that it was merely correcting a clerical error? What does the filing actually say?
Posted on 12/17/15 at 1:03 pm to Pax Regis
Sigh. What a bunch of fools.
Posted on 12/17/15 at 1:05 pm to TigerWerm
quote:
and bring back Dan Radakovich.
The same guy that had Georgia Tech's football team under NCAA investigation under his watch? I'll pass.
Posted on 12/17/15 at 1:05 pm to Pax Regis
quote:
That's not good strategy in the modern Information Age. You're working with a 30 year old playbook - much like our head coach.
What exactly is your experience with this?
I sent my wife, who does contract compliance in the Big 4, and she said "this article doesn't say anything of value"
This post was edited on 12/17/15 at 1:06 pm
Posted on 12/17/15 at 1:05 pm to TigerBait1127
quote:
The alterations aren't valid. The original contract still should be
Precisely. I apologize for not being clear on that. Thanks for bailing me out.
Posted on 12/17/15 at 1:05 pm to DmitriKaramazov
quote:
Very ambiguous article. I'd like to know precisely what the filings admit. For example, is LSU claiming that Chavis consented to the post-signature amendment? Or that it was merely correcting a clerical error? What does the filing actually say?
No one knows.
But there's a witch hunt out on our administration at this point. Everything they do or have done will be considered wrong by the public. Not saying that isn't justified. I guess we'll find out.
Just have to wait and see how it all plays out.
This post was edited on 12/17/15 at 1:07 pm
Posted on 12/17/15 at 1:06 pm to TigerBait1127
I'm not going to divulge personal details on an Internet message board. That would be poor risk management as you should know if you are so experienced and wise.
Posted on 12/17/15 at 1:08 pm to DmitriKaramazov
quote:
Very ambiguous article. I'd like to know precisely what the filings admit. For example, is LSU claiming that Chavis consented to the post-signature amendment? Or that it was merely correcting a clerical error? What does the filing actually say?
This. The statement "altered the contract after he signed it" could mean a lot of different things.
Posted on 12/17/15 at 1:08 pm to Pax Regis
Alleva is done, there is no way out of this trap but with the checkbook so quite poetically, the same mantra that saved Miles will doom Alleva. He gone.
Posted on 12/17/15 at 1:09 pm to BayouBengals03
quote:
No one knows.
But there's a witch hunt out on our administration at this point. Everything they do or have done will be considered wrong by the public. Not saying that isn't justified. I guess we'll find out.
Just have to wait and see how it all plays out.
This is true too. A lot of people are under a microscope now and will be for quite a while.
Posted on 12/17/15 at 1:10 pm to BayouBengals03
quote:
But there's a witch hunt out on our administration at this point.
Yeah, that's it.
Posted on 12/17/15 at 1:10 pm to Pax Regis
quote:This is very good news.
the administration changed the buyout clause after Chavis signed the agreement.
No way Alleva survives this if he is the person who either altered the contract or authorized someone else to alter it.
Goodbye, Joe, you gotta' go, me-oh-my-oh....
Posted on 12/17/15 at 1:11 pm to Pax Regis
quote:
I'm not going to divulge personal details on an Internet message board. That would be poor risk management as you should know if you are so experienced and wise.
Saying what you do is poor risk management?
Why?
The only reason I can think of is that you have no experience and don't know what you're talking about.
- Solid logic, right?
This post was edited on 12/17/15 at 1:13 pm
Posted on 12/17/15 at 1:12 pm to Tigerdew
quote:
Yeah, that's it.
Read the board, man.
The administration, the staff, everyone is getting blamed for every decision, event, etc.
It's all continued backlash from how the Miles situation was handled, and just because they didn't fire Miles in general. People wanted Miles fired.
Like I said, it could be proven to be correct and justified. But that's the conclusion everyone is jumping to off the bat for sure.
Posted on 12/17/15 at 1:15 pm to Pax Regis
only way alleva survives this is if he has dirt on some very important people.
Posted on 12/17/15 at 1:19 pm to Pax Regis
God damn, what is wrong with LSU administration? Jesus Christ.
Posted on 12/17/15 at 1:19 pm to BayouBengals03
quote:
Read the board, man.
The administration, the staff, everyone is getting blamed for every decision, event, etc.
It's all continued backlash from how the Miles situation was handled, and just because they didn't fire Miles in general. People wanted Miles fired.
Like I said, it could be proven to be correct and justified. But that's the conclusion everyone is jumping to off the bat for sure.
I read the board daily. There's no witch hunt. People don't want Alleva fired just because he didn't fire Miles. He completely botched the entire process and now it's coming to light that he may have actually committed fraud. That witch needs hunting.
Posted on 12/17/15 at 1:20 pm to BayouBengals03
quote:
People wanted Miles fired.
I wanted Miles fired, but my anger has alot more to do with how the situation was handled. Miles remaining head coach is something alot of people would have been ok with, but how it was handled and the ensuing dumpster fire is not ok with me.
Posted on 12/17/15 at 1:20 pm to 1999
Or it comes out that the alter was non affective to the actual contract terms. Lol. Can't believe how you guys jump to conclusions with no facts.
Page 5 of 13
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News