Started By
Message

re: LSU 2nd in the Nation in Red Zone Rushing TDs - 9 Rushing TDs - Why All the Sky Screaming?

Posted on 9/18/19 at 12:35 pm to
Posted by Todd O'Connor
MIke Ditka's Restaurant Chicago, IL
Member since Nov 2012
1273 posts
Posted on 9/18/19 at 12:35 pm to
quote:

83% is incredible its also not sustainable. YPC is a much better stat than YPA


IF you want to look at the a passing game, you have to include incomplete passes. YPA is better than YPC. if you get 100 yards one 1 pass and 0 on 19 others, you average 100 yards a completion, which would tell you that you should throw the ball more, but you absolutely shouldn't.

Sustainability is a completely different factor, but if you're chucking bombs on bad defenses your YPC isn't anymore sustainable that your Completion %.
Posted by Buckeye Jeaux
Member since May 2018
17756 posts
Posted on 9/18/19 at 12:35 pm to
quote:

The offense can still be good, great even with a lesser running game. the running game isn't "efficient" just because the overall offense is better or different. It also may not matter
In this offense, the RB is almost a second QB. His reads, and execution off his reads is more important to the overall offense than a couple extra yards rushing on average.

If you can find an RB who is elite at both, then all the better. Right now, CEH is pretty damn good at both. That's why Brady/E named him the starter.
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
85144 posts
Posted on 9/18/19 at 12:35 pm to
quote:

Yes it will. OL guys have to make sure they don't get down field. You get bigger run plays by blocking linebackers and safeties. Can't do that on an RPO. We screwed one up against GS but the ref missed the call. Had an OL 7-8 yards downfield.


RPOs are based on numbers. OL guys can't get downfield, but they also don't run the ball unless it's advantageous to do so. That makes it a wash.

Plenty of RPO offenses have substantially higher rushing numbers than us.
Posted by Todd O'Connor
MIke Ditka's Restaurant Chicago, IL
Member since Nov 2012
1273 posts
Posted on 9/18/19 at 12:36 pm to
quote:

In this offense, yes. In Les Miles' LSU offense, no.



Your logic says the opposite.

Realistically W/L tells oyu how the team is doing, not how efficient any one aspect of the team is.

"good enough to win" isn't good.
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
85144 posts
Posted on 9/18/19 at 12:38 pm to
quote:

That is out of context in this offense. Joe Burrow's yards per pass attempt is 12.5 (not completion... attempt) So, 7.9 yards per play (average from all pass attempts and rushes - 1649 yards, 208 plays)


What?

The guy asked what our rushing numbers were outside of the redzone. I gave them to him.
Posted by Todd O'Connor
MIke Ditka's Restaurant Chicago, IL
Member since Nov 2012
1273 posts
Posted on 9/18/19 at 12:39 pm to
quote:

Plenty of RPO offenses have substantially higher rushing numbers than us.


Here is the thing though, if i am playing Baylor, maybe sometimes i drop into coverage instead of biting on that handoff.

If i am play LSU who has run the ball nonstop for ever, i may play run way more often.

i wouldn't be surprised if a vast majority of our RPOs dictate a pass.
Posted by Buckeye Jeaux
Member since May 2018
17756 posts
Posted on 9/18/19 at 12:42 pm to
Sounds like you guys think the Brady/E offense sucks! LOL!
Posted by Todd O'Connor
MIke Ditka's Restaurant Chicago, IL
Member since Nov 2012
1273 posts
Posted on 9/18/19 at 12:50 pm to
quote:


Sounds like you guys think the Brady/E offense sucks! LOL!


What makes you say that?

We are defeintly a pass heavy offense not, but historically we have been a run heavy offense. So i still think teams (through 3 games) are going to play our RPOs more towards the run, which means we are going to be passing.

what percentage RPOs do you think we are running?
This post was edited on 9/18/19 at 12:51 pm
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
261772 posts
Posted on 9/18/19 at 12:51 pm to
quote:

YPC is a much better stat than YPA


Not really. In Burrow's case, his YPA shows that he's highly efficient.
Posted by Lester Earl
Member since Nov 2003
278794 posts
Posted on 9/18/19 at 12:51 pm to
quote:

While this may be true, this has nothing to do with what the OP is saying. Dumb


Sure it is. I don’t think anyone is arguing we need to run more. If they are then they are stupid.

I’ve heard people say we need to run better though. And that comes with playing the best players. Lanard Fournette is not the best player. CEH, as a full time feature back, is also not the answer. This isn’t hard
Posted by dukke v
PLUTO
Member since Jul 2006
203559 posts
Posted on 9/18/19 at 12:52 pm to
No dude.... I don’t know how many times I can say this but, LSU HAS to run the ball better to beat the upcoming SEC schedule..... this ain’t the big ten were defenses are weak.......again you don’t care if LSU wins or not as long as Joe gets his stats.... sad indeed.
Posted by dgnx6
Baton Rouge
Member since Feb 2006
68951 posts
Posted on 9/18/19 at 12:56 pm to
quote:

Exactly. As a collective fanbase LSU fans have been begging for a passing game with quality QB play and now that we have that and more, some of the fans are now complaining that we aren't running the ball. The offense is crazy effecient. It's working and working very, very well. Sit back and enjoy it.




My issue has been Emery. You put him in the game and don't even get him the ball. Which is fine, but that's 1 game closer to burning a redshirt for absolutely no reason.

But I'm liking our Redzone rt now. If you can eat up chunks in the passing game, and run it when you need to, we will be fine. Still has me shaking my head at last season and how terrible we were. I blame Steve.
Posted by H-Town Tiger
Member since Nov 2003
59134 posts
Posted on 9/18/19 at 12:56 pm to
quote:

if you get 100 yards one 1 pass and 0 on 19 others, you average 100 yards a completion, which would tell you that you should throw the ball more, but you absolutely shouldn't.


Yes well 1 completion is not an adequate sample size. We wouldn’t look at a punter or RB that threw one pass that went for a 40 yd TD and make him a QB because of his 100% completion percentage 40 yard avg per att and 100% TD

In your extreme example the 5% completion percentage would stick out
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
85144 posts
Posted on 9/18/19 at 12:59 pm to
quote:

Sure it is. I don’t think anyone is arguing we need to run more. If they are then they are stupid. I’ve heard people say we need to run better though. And that comes with playing the best players. Lanard Fournette is not the best player. CEH, as a full time feature back, is also not the answer. This isn’t hard




I think you're misunderstanding the post.

Your argument about playing the best players is separate from the point Buckeye Jeaux is trying to make.

Buckeye says we have 9 rushing TDs, therefore, our running game is great. That's asinine, and you know that too.
Posted by Todd O'Connor
MIke Ditka's Restaurant Chicago, IL
Member since Nov 2012
1273 posts
Posted on 9/18/19 at 12:59 pm to
quote:

Yes well 1 completion is not an adequate sample size. We wouldn’t look at a punter or RB that threw one pass that went for a 40 yd TD and make him a QB because of his 100% completion percentage 40 yard avg per att and 100% TD

In your extreme example the 5% completion percentage would stick out


I meant for it to stick out. YPC doesn't take completion % into account. YPA does.
Posted by Buckeye Jeaux
Member since May 2018
17756 posts
Posted on 9/18/19 at 1:05 pm to
quote:

.again you don’t care if LSU wins or not as long as Joe gets his stats.... sad indeed.
Says the guy who picked Texas over LSU... and now says Oklahoma is a better team than LSU!!!
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
261772 posts
Posted on 9/18/19 at 1:07 pm to
quote:

YPC doesn't take completion % into account. YPA does


I always look at YPA, not YPC.
Posted by Buckeye Jeaux
Member since May 2018
17756 posts
Posted on 9/18/19 at 1:08 pm to
quote:

Buckeye says we have 9 rushing TDs, therefore, our running game is great. That's asinine, and you know that too.
No, moron. I'm saying that Brady/E know what the hell they are doing, and you don't have a clue.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
261772 posts
Posted on 9/18/19 at 1:09 pm to
quote:

Says the guy who picked Texas over LSU


I breathed a sigh of relief when he did...
Posted by LSUNV
In the woods or on the water
Member since Feb 2011
22424 posts
Posted on 9/18/19 at 1:11 pm to
quote:

Brady/E know what the hell they are doing


I don’t think anyone could argue this at all. I just hope once Ed Ingram is back in the lineup our run blocking will get better
first pageprev pagePage 6 of 9Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram