1
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: La. Appeals Court sides with players after SEC appeal
Posted on 9/15/26 at 9:40 am to mcspufftiger7
Posted on 9/15/26 at 9:40 am to mcspufftiger7
I didn't say it was right or wrong. But nobody should be surprised by this decision.
Posted on 9/15/26 at 9:53 am to Decatur
Tom Mars is wrongggg again
This post was edited on 9/15/26 at 12:08 pm
Posted on 9/15/26 at 9:56 am to Decatur
quote:
This appeal was filed secretly
Posted on 9/15/26 at 10:23 am to Indefatigable
What kind of back woods southern lawyer shite is this.
Posted on 9/15/26 at 10:26 am to gumbeaux
quote:
Yesterday an Arkansas judge upheld a previous ruling that two players that attended a mini camp can remain on Arkansas’ roster without any penalties from the NCAA.
But what about the SEC?
Posted on 9/15/26 at 10:29 am to CapitalTiger
quote:
and he refuses to see the forrest through the trees.
A lot of Yankees made this mistake, too.
Posted on 9/15/26 at 10:30 am to dallastiger55
quote:
It’s hilarious people actually think the SEC and Sankey are in trouble
Antitrust lawsuits have entered the chat.
Posted on 9/15/26 at 10:42 am to Tchefuncte Tiger
quote:
But what about the SEC?
This SEC’s new Teams call “pro player” rules allow those players to be rostered. The NCAA cast a wider net and said ANY player who attended ANY pro event, mini-camps included.
Thats the reason for this.
Posted on 9/15/26 at 10:50 am to misey94
quote:
This SEC’s new Teams call “pro player” rules allow those players to be rostered. The NCAA cast a wider net and said ANY player who attended ANY pro event, mini-camps included.
Thats the reason for this.
That’s my understanding also. But was that clearly defined by the SEC before all this started? If not, then Sankey clearly had a vendetta against Kiffin/LSU to jump right into severe sanctions or expulsion. It seems to me that maybe the rules were defined as he went along.
Posted on 9/15/26 at 10:55 am to gumbeaux
The only thing "secret" about the filing is that the SEC didn't put out a fricking self aggrandizing press release about it
Posted on 9/15/26 at 10:56 am to Decatur
I said it before, in the long term this is going to turn against the SEC. Recent history says the courts do not look kindly on blocking players from earning wages using inconsistently applied rules. The NCAA has affirmed that 5for5 is the rule now and these players were denied opportunities within those guidelines. Had the NCAA rolled this rule out prior to them moving toward the NFL there would be no issue, but they didn't and there is. All the NCAA and conferences had to do to keep a handle on this was announce clear guidelines on returning to college if you had started to pursue an NFL career without knowledge of the new rule and we wouldn't be in this mess.
Posted on 9/15/26 at 11:03 am to dallastiger55
It’s funny YOU don’t think they are! When all 16 institutions are paying millions upon millions in antitrust damages a piece maybe then you’ll understand how bad the SEC and Sankey F’d up!
He opened the conference up to antitrust suits when only the NCAA had to worry about that. That is no freaking bueno! That affects EVERY school in this conference including LSU.
He opened the conference up to antitrust suits when only the NCAA had to worry about that. That is no freaking bueno! That affects EVERY school in this conference including LSU.
Posted on 9/15/26 at 11:06 am to Tchefuncte Tiger
Always go with this one when you need a image of Nathan Bedford Forrest. It's just great.
This post was edited on 9/15/26 at 1:23 pm
Posted on 9/15/26 at 11:18 am to LSUtigerNVegas9
quote:
He opened the conference up to antitrust suits when only the NCAA had to worry about that.
In addition to contempt of court charges…
…And possible criminal conspiracy and collusion charges for Sankey and the university presidents who coerced LSU into not following the court order.
Posted on 9/15/26 at 11:19 am to CapitalTiger
....for the trees ??...
Posted on 9/15/26 at 11:35 am to IM_4_LSU
quote:
Tony Clayton and the players attorneys just need to file a lawsuit against the SEC and NCAA and get damages.
They have to have this ruling in their pocket to do that to justify damages. Without it they got nothing
Posted on 9/15/26 at 11:36 am to tzimme4
quote:
A Louisiana court sides with the players who are supported by the state college and governor. Who here is shocked?
A bitch chimes in. Who here is shocked?
Posted on 9/15/26 at 11:41 am to Decatur
Sankey is a planting banana on someone else’s payroll.
Posted on 9/15/26 at 11:44 am to UnsureTiger
quote:
Someone has lost institutional control, but it isn’t us.
This post was edited on 9/15/26 at 11:53 am
Posted on 9/15/26 at 11:46 am to JayVegas702
quote:
The only thing "secret" about the filing is that the SEC didn't put out a fricking self aggrandizing press release about it
Sankey’s text to Ross must have not gone through.
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News