
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: La. Appeals Court sides with players after SEC appeal
Posted on 9/15/26 at 11:52 am to UnsureTiger
Posted on 9/15/26 at 11:52 am to UnsureTiger
quote:
There wasn't a ruling made in favor of the players or anyone. The only thing that was ruled on is that the state Judge (in this case Judge Jorden) has the authority to grant a stay. That's all that this was.
I mean that isn’t exactly nothing.
It’s saying that the stay is effective, which should allow the players the protection to play while the case move through the courts, exactly the same protection Chambliss is playing under this weekend, as no ruling has been reached in his case either.
It also slaps Finebaum around for his “kangaroo court” shtick he pulled all week as well. This isn’t just some “rogue biased state court judge”, this is a three judge appellate panel and they affirmed the state court action that should have allowed these players to be rostered during the case.
In fact, this is even a stronger case for these players because Chambliss’ case never received appellate confirmation because the SEC DIDN’T EVEN APPEAL. He simply got his TRO and rolled down the street from the courthouse back to campus. So he truly is playing just under some Ole Miss homer, at least according to Finebaum, if he was being consistent, which he never is.
But no one will report on this, especially not that dildo with ears, and the national audience will continue to operate under the dishonest impression that Kiffin and LSU are dirty and trying to cheat by playing “pro players”.
Maybe the players will get a mention on Gameday next year when the SEC has to pay them damages for violating their right to pursue their rightful fifth year of eligibility, which they never waived because they were told they didn’t have one only to have the rules changed a month later.

This post was edited on 9/15/26 at 12:27 pm
Posted on 9/15/26 at 11:59 am to bluestem75
Yep. Either they have cognitive dissonance and they’re “burying their head in the sand” or are really this obtuse and this is beyond their level of comprehension.
What was the famous George Carlin quote about the average person? Something along the lines of take how stupid the average person is. Now half of them are dumber than that.

What was the famous George Carlin quote about the average person? Something along the lines of take how stupid the average person is. Now half of them are dumber than that.
Posted on 9/15/26 at 12:14 pm to Decatur
D’Quan and Xzavian bout to get paid in SEC bucks.
This post was edited on 9/15/26 at 12:30 pm
Posted on 9/15/26 at 12:20 pm to gumbeaux
quote:
Harris and Wright need to continue to pursue their lawsuit against Sankey and the SEC.
Sankey: "You got players, you can have players, you got players too. LSU, no players for you."
Posted on 9/15/26 at 12:24 pm to Decatur
The bigger takeaway here is that the conference is on an inevitable crash course. If not with LSU, eventually with someone.
All of their power is illusory & the house of cards will come tumbling down as soon as a member institution is incentivized to actually see this sort of litigation through (or as soon as the SEC tries to impose a harsh penalty on a member).
The core problem is that CFB now has money involved above board, while the conference’s antiquated bylaws still allow severe punitive / damaging measures without arbitration or evidence.
That’s going to end in a permanent injunction on antitrust grounds, requiring bylaws be rewritten.
This is why they haven’t actually levied any penalties & withdrew their fed case… All they have are threats, as soon as they follow through the whole thing blows up in their face.
It’s just a matter of time.
All of their power is illusory & the house of cards will come tumbling down as soon as a member institution is incentivized to actually see this sort of litigation through (or as soon as the SEC tries to impose a harsh penalty on a member).
The core problem is that CFB now has money involved above board, while the conference’s antiquated bylaws still allow severe punitive / damaging measures without arbitration or evidence.
That’s going to end in a permanent injunction on antitrust grounds, requiring bylaws be rewritten.
This is why they haven’t actually levied any penalties & withdrew their fed case… All they have are threats, as soon as they follow through the whole thing blows up in their face.
It’s just a matter of time.
This post was edited on 9/15/26 at 12:26 pm
Posted on 9/15/26 at 12:27 pm to DeathByTossDive226
I truly believe that if LSU had any sort of feeling that they were NOT gonna be contenders this year, that they’d see this through the finish line in a court room
Posted on 9/15/26 at 12:36 pm to TheRouxGuru
quote:
I truly believe that if LSU had any sort of feeling that they were NOT gonna be contenders this year, that they’d see this through the finish line in a court room
I think we just didn’t want to sue our own league or be responsible for dismantling the SEC. But the first time the league tries to actually illegally penalize a school, that’s what will happen.
Posted on 9/15/26 at 12:37 pm to DeathByTossDive226
quote:
The bigger takeaway here is that the conference is on an inevitable crash course. If not with LSU, eventually with someone.
All of their power is illusory & the house of cards will come tumbling down as soon as a member institution is incentivized to actually see this sort of litigation through (or as soon as the SEC tries to impose a harsh penalty on a member).
The SEC made a bizarre choice to step in for the NCAA on this issue. They never once acted as the regulator for eligibility, frankly benefited from SEC programs lack of concern for NCAA rules.
The NCAA never wins in court on labor issues, there was no reason for the SEC to think they would either.
I believe Sankey/presidents did not like the fact that this case inches forward the idea they are going to have to share revenue with players. Particularly when they in the middle of trying to expand the players with absolutely zero imput from people playing.
the 24 team playoff is so dumb. Unless they putting serious money in the pockets of the players, there will be opt outs
Posted on 9/15/26 at 1:01 pm to Decatur
SEC will be sued for millions by the two “NFL players”.
LSU fans aught to launch a class action lawsuit for damages to our season, and mental anguish for the attempted expelling from the SEC of a founding member.
LSU fans aught to launch a class action lawsuit for damages to our season, and mental anguish for the attempted expelling from the SEC of a founding member.
Posted on 9/15/26 at 1:16 pm to bluestem75
quote:
quote: He opened the conference up to antitrust suits when only the NCAA had to worry about that. In addition to contempt of court charges… …And possible criminal conspiracy and collusion charges for Sankey and the university presidents who coerced LSU into not following the court order
What about perjury? If, if they have evidence through some sort of discovery that he knew about the 5for5 well before he claimed under oath.
Posted on 9/15/26 at 1:17 pm to BR Tiger
Sshhhh it was double secret appeal filing in the middle night.
Posted on 9/15/26 at 1:20 pm to tzimme4
By your logic, if a federal judge in Birmingham decides in favor of the SEC it’s not legit.
Posted on 9/15/26 at 2:01 pm to UnsureTiger
quote:
There was no secret filing. You can't secretly file anything with the supreme court. There wasn't a ruling made in favor of the players or anyone. The only thing that was ruled on is that the state Judge (in this case Judge Jorden) has the authority to grant a stay. That's all that this was.
It was a ruling from the Louisiana First Circuit Court of Appeal (not the Supreme Court) that denied the writ application (not an appeal) filed by the SEC and Sankey. What the court ruled was that the preliminary injunction issued by the district court would not be stayed because the district judge did not abuse his discretion.
The court didn't "side with the players." The appellate court simply found that the district judge had the discretion to do what he did. Whether an injunction is warranted can be taken up on appeal - after a trial is held. It is very unlikely that such a trial can be held before the season is over.
What I would really like to see is a dismissal of the federal court suit for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and a contempt ruling in the state court against the SEC for circumventing/disobeying the preliminary injunction - followed by an eventual damages award.

Popular
Back to top


1












