- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Kelly just said that Nuss suffered an Ab Strain in fall camp
Posted on 10/1/25 at 8:58 pm to AncientArousal
Posted on 10/1/25 at 8:58 pm to AncientArousal
quote:because there was a thread yesterday saying he had a torn oblique that got traction...this morning, Kelly was asked about the rumors of the nature of Nuss's injury and Kelly said for the first time that it was an ab strain, which is not as bad as a torn oblique...before yesterday, all we knew was that he had a upper torso injury...
I'm sorry but what was the point of stickying a post saying that Nuss didn't have a specific core injury when he had a different type of core injury ?
Posted on 10/1/25 at 9:04 pm to moneyg
quote:
You are confusing performance with health. Supposedly he was held out if a bunch of practices in the fall leading up to game 1. And now he’s cleared.
He was “cleared” just as much then as he is now. That’s why he would sit out of practice then play in a scrimmage the very next day.
Posted on 10/1/25 at 9:22 pm to LSBoosie
quote:
He was “cleared” just as much then as he is now. That’s why he would sit out of practice then play in a scrimmage the very next day.
You are missing the point.
He was limited at one point. He’s not limited right now.
Obviously that doesn’t guarantee high level of play.
That’s why you are confused. When Kelly says he’s on the back end, he’s not saying that he’s 100% or that the injury or the time missed is not having a negative impact.
Posted on 10/1/25 at 9:34 pm to Chicken
quote:
heals pretty quick if not re-aggravated
So, sitting out the SELA game would’ve hastened healing, then, correct? Ridiculous. I loathe Brian Kelly.
Posted on 10/1/25 at 9:34 pm to moneyg
If the injury is affecting his play, then I still consider it an injury. I don’t really care that he is able to run through drills at practice if it’s still limiting what he can do on the field.
Also, I would say he’s limited right now considering he literally isn’t practicing.
Also, I would say he’s limited right now considering he literally isn’t practicing.
This post was edited on 10/1/25 at 9:38 pm
Posted on 10/1/25 at 9:47 pm to ZeekFreak
quote:Would you say the best part of the team is the defense?
I wish we pulled him as well but a stretch to say it lost the game. Game wasn't as close as the final score indicated.
Because if so, the offense scored on a long drive, to get within 1 score with over 5 minutes left in the game.
That puts the defense- best part of the team- on the field to get a stop, and get the ball back with a shot to win it.
We even got it to a 4th down at just outside FG range with over a minute and a half. We failed to hold... but with that much time left, we have the skill players (Brown, Thomas, Hilton etc) with speed to get it to around the 40 or 35, and then from there you could try some jump balls to our 6'7 TE.
It's absolutely possible.
Posted on 10/1/25 at 11:23 pm to LSBoosie
quote:
If the injury is affecting his play, then I still consider it an injury. I don’t really care that he is able to run through drills at practice if it’s still limiting what he can do on the field.
You are getting lost in the weeds. Obviously he is still injured. Obviously it is affecting him physically.
The question that needs to be answered is if he’s the best option moving forward. And because he’s not “limited” (meaning unable to practice) when he was before, the coaches think that there is improvement in the near future.
Your post is a good example of the misunderstanding. Just like Chicken wasn’t saying ther was zero injury, Kelly isn’t saying that Nuss is 100%. He’s saying that hes improving, he’s practicing, and because if that (and what he thinks of MVB) he’s the best option moving forward.
Posted on 10/2/25 at 5:22 am to Chicken
Damn, Nuss threw his heretofore best WR baller into a fricking car wreck…
Posted on 10/3/25 at 5:00 pm to Sailin Tiger
Bro, your reading comprehension is cooked.
All muscle tears are strains, but not all strains are tears, grade 1 strains are OVERSTRETCHED muscles. How did you not get that from my comment?
All muscle tears are strains, but not all strains are tears, grade 1 strains are OVERSTRETCHED muscles. How did you not get that from my comment?
Popular
Back to top

0




