- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 6/12/14 at 12:34 pm to TigerfFaithful
quote:
Ok, then pick up the phone and call Nathan Fisher. I am sure JM had his number if not his card.
He might have but he's not a free attorney assigned by LSU and he's not even Mills' attorney.
quote:
Johnson is not the only criminal defense attorney who has worked with numerous high-profile college athletes from the same program. Since the 1980s, Nathan Fisher of Baton Rouge, La., said he has represented more than 100 Louisiana State University athletes. In an interview, Fisher said he typically charged athletes nothing, a practice he said brought the NCAA to his door every couple of years. He said he took the cases because he liked to help students and because he believed athletes were often unfairly targeted for arrest. He also said representing athletes was good for business. "If I get a good case and it gets publicity, I'd hope people see it," Fisher said.
But in recent years, Fisher said LSU had changed its view of the practice. In August 2011, starting LSU quarterback Jordan Jefferson was arrested after a bar brawl, and Fisher began representing him. Fisher said a school representative told him to stop providing free counsel to LSU players and to begin charging them his usual fee.
LSU spokesman Herb Vincent said the school believed it was in its best interests for Fisher to stop the practice.
The attorney who took over the Jefferson case, Lewis Unglesby, said LSU officials also asked him whether he was getting paid. Jefferson's family, Unglesby said, had no problem paying his regular rate, which he declined to specify but said was "a sufficient amount to where no questions would be asked." A grand jury reduced the charge from a felony to a misdemeanor and Jefferson pleaded no contest and received probation.
This post was edited on 6/12/14 at 12:36 pm
Posted on 6/12/14 at 12:40 pm to LSUdm21
quote:
He might have but he's not a free attorney assigned by LSU.
Agreed, I should have edited that statement as it relates to the word "assigned."
Fisher has been representing LSU athletes and students for many years. I am certain he has somewhat flexible and creative fee arrangements.
Posted on 6/12/14 at 12:41 pm to Emiliooo
This case shows why it's dangerous to jump to conclusions without knowing all the facts. For instance, I remember the Duke lacrosse case a few years ago. Everyone was crucifying the players and ruining their lives, when the accuser turned out to be making the whole thing up. Worse, the corrupt DA turned out to be hiding DNA evidence that would exonerate the players. It didn't end until Durham got a new DA who dropped the charges.
While this case doesn't quite rise to that level, it has some similar elements, such as the victim lying about what happened and so many people willing to believe her story without more evidence to back it up. Not saying I would defend Mills under any circumstance, but it'll take more than just an accusation to turn me against someone. The truth always comes to light eventually. I know it's hard in this society of instant gratification, but it's best for everyone if we wait until it does.
While this case doesn't quite rise to that level, it has some similar elements, such as the victim lying about what happened and so many people willing to believe her story without more evidence to back it up. Not saying I would defend Mills under any circumstance, but it'll take more than just an accusation to turn me against someone. The truth always comes to light eventually. I know it's hard in this society of instant gratification, but it's best for everyone if we wait until it does.
Posted on 6/12/14 at 12:50 pm to TigerfFaithful
quote:
Fisher has been representing LSU athletes and students for many years. I am certain he has somewhat flexible and creative fee arrangements.
And he hasn't represented anyone since Jefferson.
Posted on 6/12/14 at 1:01 pm to LSUdm21
quote:
And he hasn't represented anyone since Jefferson.
I'm sure he still has nightmares
Posted on 6/12/14 at 1:04 pm to CptBengal
You know you can't mention Jefferson without this clown showing up.
Posted on 6/12/14 at 1:17 pm to Galactic Inquisitor
the op should update the op with the newest information. IMO these threads should be treated like game threads where the op is expected to keep the title and thread up to date.
Posted on 6/12/14 at 1:21 pm to heartbreakTiger
quote:
the op should update the op with the newest information. IMO these threads should be treated like game threads where the op is expected to keep the title and thread up to date.
agreed. it gets tiresome reading through posts that opine points that have later been addressed multiple times. many people just read the first page or less of a thread and then give their opinion without the pertinent facts. people here still hung up on the fact that he skipped his voluntary meeting with the investigator as if that has any bearing on anything. sigh
This post was edited on 6/12/14 at 1:22 pm
Posted on 6/12/14 at 1:46 pm to lsufball19
if I remember correctly- Fisher was representing the entire Shady's 4. Then he had to give up 2 and keep 2. One of his keepers was Jarvis Landry. And he was cleared of everything.
Posted on 6/12/14 at 1:53 pm to lsufball19
What's new regarding this matter? I've read a few post in here that say there are reports refuting the "victim's" version. Are there any updates?
Posted on 6/12/14 at 1:53 pm to lsufball19
Should be some news coming out tonight or tomorrow... Nothing major, maybe just a little tidbit

Posted on 6/12/14 at 2:29 pm to CheerWhine
quote:
For instance, I remember the Duke lacrosse case a few years ago
So do I.
Sincerely,
Joe Alleva
Posted on 6/12/14 at 2:32 pm to TigerBait1127
quote:
Mills was pretty garbage until he moved to Safety.
Do you think he goes pro this year? If so, what round?
Posted on 6/12/14 at 3:07 pm to lsufball19
quote:
you've said this several times in multiple threads. it's not correct, in any way. that's not how it works, sorry. i'm telling you as someone who handles such things in the course of my profession. so please cure your own ignorance and accept the fact that his not talking to investigators had zero to do with his being charged with the crime, ZERO
Obviously,you are getting hung up on the word "arrested". If you bothered reading my next post I already addressed this issue.
Posted on 6/12/14 at 3:15 pm to LSUNV
quote:
Obviously,you are getting hung up on the word "arrested". If you bothered reading my next post I already addressed this issue.
A few pages back:
quote:
he was arrested for not showing up at an appointment with the police to tell his side of the story
It's OK to be wrong, bruh.
Posted on 6/12/14 at 3:18 pm to LSUNV
quote:
Obviously,you are getting hung up on the word "arrested". If you bothered reading my next post I already addressed this issue.
it doesn't have an adverse effect on his prosecution whatsoever. yet you continue to address it as if it's relevant. it's not. it had no effect on the decision to charge, only the timing of it. he was going to be charged regardless. they just wanted more than they had and hope that Mills made an incriminating statement. he has a constitutional right not to give a voluntary statement and also has the constitutional right not to have his refusal to give a voluntary statement, protecting his 5th amendment rights, not used against him in the course of his prosecution. you asserting that it had any effect, whatsoever, is just not correct. this is very basic criminal procedure law.
This post was edited on 6/12/14 at 3:20 pm
Posted on 6/12/14 at 3:23 pm to lsu2006
Damn, dude read the next post. Do you not know the word next?
Obviously, he was arrested for probable cause. And no showing did not hurt him legally at all but the issuance of a warrant was a direct result of that which was stated in the next post
Obviously, he was arrested for probable cause. And no showing did not hurt him legally at all but the issuance of a warrant was a direct result of that which was stated in the next post
Posted on 6/12/14 at 3:28 pm to LSUNV
Whoa my bad
This post was edited on 6/12/14 at 3:31 pm
Popular
Back to top


1






