- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Is LSU considered a CFB Blue Blood?
Posted on 10/31/22 at 6:05 am to theantiquetiger
Posted on 10/31/22 at 6:05 am to theantiquetiger
They took a coach from ND who you have listed here. So yes
0
Posted on 10/31/22 at 6:15 am to theantiquetiger
Yes
Posted on 10/31/22 at 6:26 am to theantiquetiger
Nope
Posted on 10/31/22 at 6:29 am to theantiquetiger
If Penn State is, we should be.
Posted on 10/31/22 at 8:00 am to mdomingue
quote:
o, we are not a blue blood. 2011 taught you that.
So you don't understand the term blue blood. Got it
Oh, I understand it completely, especially in the terms of how CFB, as a sport, defines a blue blood.
A Blue Blood would NEVER have been required to beat a team AGAIN that they already beat ON THE ROAD at that point in time/history. ESPN/Media even dropped the "Every Game Counts" motto they were pumping for years after the real Blue Blood lost the "Game of the Century".
So, yes, my understanding of how CFB works is dead on.
Should LSU be considered a blue blood? YES.
Does the CFB Media (the entity that really runs the sport) consider LSU a blue blood? NO
LSU will always be one of those teams that will have to win their division, conference, AND have a similar record as the top teams in contention to be considered for a title. The Blue Bloods can lose important games, not win their conference, not win their division, and still get in the title games or playoffs.
Posted on 10/31/22 at 8:40 am to theantiquetiger
When the coach of ND leaves for your school, your school might be a blue blood.
Posted on 10/31/22 at 8:54 am to theantiquetiger
How many teams have 3 CFB natty’s this century?
I’d say that should be the ‘blueblood’ standard
I’d say that should be the ‘blueblood’ standard
Posted on 10/31/22 at 8:55 am to BZ504
Winsipedia has us as the #10 ranked program, though these rankings give the same weight to bowl games as national championships. Still it's a fun website to look at.
Posted on 10/31/22 at 9:03 am to theantiquetiger
Not sure if mentioned yet but I really believe going back to 1959 season game @ Tenn if B Cannons 2 pt run conversion is good (as should have been) Tigers would win that and be named MNC for back to back years and put them in a whole different class with some of the so called Blue Blood teams and maybe mindset for the following years.
Posted on 10/31/22 at 9:05 am to theantiquetiger
Who gives a shite…. all this blue bud blood crap is the dumbest shite I have ever heard of, I don’t consider any of them a blueblood it’s fricking stupid
Posted on 10/31/22 at 9:08 am to theantiquetiger
Top 15 program all time and have been moving closer and closer to top 10 since the turn of the century.
Posted on 10/31/22 at 9:41 am to LSUfan4444
It works like this:
Saban is the new money generation who broke into the Blue Blood Party. Miles and ED O continued to be successful, garner invites to the party; but, ultimately showed we were still new money attitude. However, if Kelly gets a championship and has long term success our "new money" tag will evaporate by nature of time spent hob knobbing amongst the Blue Bloods. Cause sooner or later there will be a younger "New Money" team to start taking all the flack..
Saban is the new money generation who broke into the Blue Blood Party. Miles and ED O continued to be successful, garner invites to the party; but, ultimately showed we were still new money attitude. However, if Kelly gets a championship and has long term success our "new money" tag will evaporate by nature of time spent hob knobbing amongst the Blue Bloods. Cause sooner or later there will be a younger "New Money" team to start taking all the flack..
This post was edited on 10/31/22 at 9:43 am
Posted on 10/31/22 at 9:54 am to TxWampus
quote:\
It works like this:
Saban is the new money generation
It started before Saban.
Dinardo brought the magic back and thats inarguable. Saban elevated it but Dinardo led this program back to relevance and a top 15 program.
Posted on 10/31/22 at 10:06 am to theantiquetiger
LSU is either 11 or 12 in all time wins IMO you should make the “blue books “ a little longer list and add LSU, NEB, FL, AU and perhaps Miami or Clemson.
This post was edited on 10/31/22 at 10:07 am
Posted on 10/31/22 at 10:12 am to theantiquetiger
We are 12th in all-time wins which is 4th in the SEC.
1.Michigan 984
2.Ohio State 950
3.Alabama 949
4.Notre Dame 934
5.Oklahoma 933
6.Texas 933
7.Penn State 915
8.Nebraska 911
9.Tennessee 864
10.USC 863
11.Georgia 861
12.LSU 829
1.Michigan 984
2.Ohio State 950
3.Alabama 949
4.Notre Dame 934
5.Oklahoma 933
6.Texas 933
7.Penn State 915
8.Nebraska 911
9.Tennessee 864
10.USC 863
11.Georgia 861
12.LSU 829
This post was edited on 10/31/22 at 10:38 am
Posted on 10/31/22 at 10:23 am to theantiquetiger
quote:
Bama
Mich
Ohio St
USC
OK
TX
ND
Penn St
Tenn
GA
I dont think LSU is a blue blood. But they are a power. If the bottom three are on a list, so is LSU.
Posted on 10/31/22 at 10:24 am to theantiquetiger
quote:
There are the obvious Blue Bloods:
Bama
Mich
Ohio St
USC
OK
TX
ND
Penn St
Tenn
GA
Bama
OSU
Only recently relevant BBs on that list. UGA is new to the party.
LSU is a BB; 2nd in national titles only to Bama since 2000.
There's an argument for Mich & USC but not anyone else on that list imo given RECENT history.
Posted on 10/31/22 at 10:28 am to LSUfan4444
quote:
quote:
It works like this:
Saban is the new money generation
\
It started before Saban.
Dinardo brought the magic back and thats inarguable. Saban elevated it but Dinardo led this program back to relevance and a top 15 program.
Arnsparger had us more on the cusp than Dinardo, and I'm not even shitting on Dinardo with that point.
Posted on 10/31/22 at 10:47 am to Y.A. Tittle
quote:
Arnsparger had us more on the cusp than Dinardo, and I'm not even shitting on Dinardo with that point.
Oh I agree...they were supplanted in that top 15 but then fell off.
Saban gets the credit for getting them back but I don't think Dinardo get enough credit for getting them back to a top 15 program while Saban took that and elevated it.
Posted on 10/31/22 at 12:35 pm to dat yat
You have several programs listed as a NO that have won NC’s inside your 25 year threshold. Florida actually has 2. So what gives??
Page 7 of 8
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News