Started By
Message

Is it bama or saban

Posted on 11/7/18 at 11:45 pm
Posted by s-port tiger
Member since Jan 2005
526 posts
Posted on 11/7/18 at 11:45 pm
I am sick of reading and hearing media and fans preach about how bama is somehow destined to be great. People forget that there have been large periods of time that bama was mediocre or irrelevant. The fact is that saban is the reason they are great.
Yes, they also had a great coach in bear bryant, but there was a lot of average in between these two.
I refuse to believe they are somehow inherently better than LSU. Louisiana has better talent and a better recruiting base. We have as good as or better facilities and alumni and have no tangible reasons to be inferior. Yes, saban is the greatest of all time, but he will not last forever. We need to be positioned to crush them the day he is no longer there. I hope Ed is the guy, but I have to be honest that I remain skeptical. I don’t know what Saban’s long term goals are but I hope he finishes achieving them soon. It is time for the game to be without him so the game can be fun again.
Posted by Joey Big Balls
Louisiana Tech
Member since Oct 2018
233 posts
Posted on 11/7/18 at 11:46 pm to
Tl;dr
Posted by SammyTiger
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2009
66342 posts
Posted on 11/7/18 at 11:48 pm to
Saban let’s Bama recruit nationally but it’s Saban

Saban took a 3-8 LSU team and won a NC 4 years later, and he had us locked and loaded for an insane run 2005-2007. He probably would have won 1-2 more in that time period while still recruiting lights out.

It’s Saban.
Posted by beauchristopher
new orleans
Member since Jan 2008
65812 posts
Posted on 11/8/18 at 12:02 am to
Who forgets they were mediocre and bad at times???

Thanks Rich Rodriguez
Posted by AshLSU
Member since Nov 2015
12868 posts
Posted on 11/8/18 at 12:03 am to
It’s Saban. Alabama will almost always recruit well because of the money they pour into it, but without Saban, they are an average upper tier program much like LSU, OSU, Auburn, Florida, Georgia, etc... They will always have a shot at a run at a National Championship every year, but they won’t make it most years.
Posted by TigerKnights
Member since Jun 2011
3271 posts
Posted on 11/8/18 at 1:59 am to
Bama can pay players, use PEDs, gets easy schedules, media bias, and ref bias.

So its primarily Bama but Saban puts it over the top.
Posted by PatriotAlum
Birmingham, AL
Member since Jan 2007
59 posts
Posted on 11/8/18 at 5:20 am to
quote:

Saban let’s Bama recruit nationally but it’s Saban Saban took a 3-8 LSU team and won a NC 4 years later, and he had us locked and loaded for an insane run 2005-2007. He probably would have won 1-2 more in that time period while still recruiting lights out. It’s Saban.


It's both, more Saban than Alabama but Alabama is one of the biggest names in college ball all the way back to 1925 and allows coaches to recruit nationwide even before Saban. Louisiana produces more recruits than Alabama but Bama was recruiting throughout the south before the SEC existed. Defensive end Bear Bryant was recruited from Arkansas in the 1930's. People make fun of Bama claiming 17 championships, but the NCAA recognizes 15 of them, under 4 different coaches.

LINK

Bama was a national power from 1925 though 1945, then was down until Bryant took over in 1958 and was a national power again from 1960 into the early 1980's, then was good but not great through 1990 and was a national power again for about 6 years, then was up and down until Saban was hired in 2007. Saban could win at most schools but it was easier at Bama than most places. He could have won just as big at USC, Notre Dame, Ohio State, and Texas. He almost took a job at USC before coming to LSU but his agent talked him out of it. He also talked to Texas while at Bama but his wife talked him out of it.
Posted by TigerBert
Member since Oct 2015
3018 posts
Posted on 11/8/18 at 5:29 am to
Saban
Posted by Buckeye Jeaux
Member since May 2018
17756 posts
Posted on 11/8/18 at 5:58 am to
quote:

Bama can pay players, use PEDs, gets easy schedules, media bias, and ref bias.


Agree. But I'd put refs first and PEDs a close second.
Posted by mauser
Orange Beach
Member since Nov 2008
21425 posts
Posted on 11/8/18 at 6:00 am to
It's Saban, but Alabama gives him and all of their previous coaches anything they legally need to make a championship team. Saban wouldn't be there otherwise. He could never have close to this success at Vandy or even Miss St.
Posted by TexasTiger89
Houston, TX
Member since Feb 2005
24245 posts
Posted on 11/8/18 at 6:04 am to
Saban. No doubt.
Posted by Tigahtildeath
Member since Aug 2017
559 posts
Posted on 11/8/18 at 6:07 am to
Alabama has beaten us 53 times out of 83. Saban and Bryant have not been there 53 years combined. So it appears, it’s more Bama than an individual coach. What Bama has that we don’t are successful coaches that stay a long, long time. Even Stallings was there 7 years and won 6 of 7 against us.
This post was edited on 11/8/18 at 6:12 am
Posted by guttata
prairieville
Member since Feb 2006
22504 posts
Posted on 11/8/18 at 6:09 am to
Saban probably has a good 7-10 yrs left in him. O will not be at LSU for the next 7-10 yrs
Posted by mdomingue
Lafayette, LA
Member since Nov 2010
29971 posts
Posted on 11/8/18 at 7:12 am to
quote:

Alabama has beaten us 53 times out of 83
53 times in 83 tries. 20-5 against Bryant. 10-3 vs Saban. 30-8 vs those 2 guys. 30 of 53 victories by Bama under Bear & little Nicky. 23 under everyone else. 8 Of 30 non wins (5 ties) under that pair. 22 of 30 LSU vitories against everyone else. So vs not Saban or Bryant Alabama leads 23-17-5
quote:

So it appears, it’s more Bama than an individual coach.


Not to me, though it is not only the coach post Bear Bryant at least. It’s a tradition that started then, IMO.


Interestingly Miles (5) and Saban (4) have the most wins vs Alabama. 3 of Miles vs Saban, ironically. A Arnsparger to that list, he never lost to Bama. 2 wins and 1 tie. Those 3 coaches have 12 of 30 non losses and 10 of 25 victories.
Posted by OKTGR580
Baton Rouge to Houston, TX
Member since Apr 2018
6318 posts
Posted on 11/8/18 at 8:01 am to
quote:

I refuse to believe they are somehow inherently better than LSU. Louisiana has better talent and a better recruiting base. We have as good as or better facilities and alumni and have no tangible reasons to be inferior.


You my friend are living in denial. Yes La FB talent is better than AL. But guess what, at UA you are smack dab in the middle of the southeast. You’ve got Atlanta, Florida, MS, La. we’ve got basically just La and Texas which is already over recruited. What’s so hard to understand about Alabama being a historically better program? They have always been a winner. Maybe not to this level but Alabama has always been good. LSU only got relevant in 2000 when SABAN came. Saban is that damn good and him going to a place like Alabama was the perfect storm. He would be doing the same at places like Penn State, USC, Texas and Notre Dame. LSU isn’t built to sustain long term success like those places. The commitment to football by the administration just isn’t there and never will be there.

Stop crying and asking these questions. LSU is a damn good program and we are going to go 11-2 after surviving that ridiculous schedule. Come on!
This post was edited on 11/8/18 at 8:03 am
Posted by sjmabry
Texas
Member since Aug 2013
18495 posts
Posted on 11/8/18 at 8:08 am to
This
Posted by LSUANDY25
Frisco
Member since Dec 2012
3087 posts
Posted on 11/8/18 at 9:15 am to
Saban is good but Alabama is a top 4 program with many advantages.
Any wonder why Saban took that job in the first place? The timing was terrible but he knew it was now or never. He even quit on his owner and players to accept that job.

Why did Saban take the Bama job when he did? Why?

Because he knew he would be unstoppable there. Whenever one of the big 4 gets a great coach they not only win big, they dominate their leagues.

He saw the players they were able to recruit even when they sucked while he was at LSU.

Tuscaloosa sits right in the heart of the SE US. Its within 200 miles of like 5 states.

Texas, USCw, Ohio State and Alabama are the four blue blood programs with distinct recruiting advantages. Thats why these schools can win Natl titles with just good coaches. The rest of the tier B schools have to have a great coach, a decade best defense or a Heisman type of QB to win it all.

There are a few exceptions like whenever 2 of the 3 big Florida schools suck the other one can move into this arena. Oklahoma and Michigan can move into this arena with just a decent coach as well if Texas and Ohio State are stinking it up.

YOu are correct that Saban may be good enough to dominate a decade at several SEC schools. But at Bama, it was guaranteed.



This post was edited on 11/8/18 at 10:36 am
Posted by Tigerfly66
Member since Oct 2018
416 posts
Posted on 11/8/18 at 9:18 am to
Alabama period. Saban is great. Bama had Bryant and won a ton before Bryant.
And the guys after Saban will win.
What other program can claim the two greatest coaches of all time?
But we whine and complain. Do what they’re doing...Saban did
Posted by jrodfishin
Gonzales, LA
Member since Aug 2018
207 posts
Posted on 11/8/18 at 10:42 am to
I just know I'm young enough to see the day Saban retires
Posted by JKChesterton
Member since Dec 2012
4011 posts
Posted on 11/8/18 at 10:47 am to

quote:

Alabama has beaten us 53 times out of 83. Saban and Bryant have not been there 53 years combined. So it appears, it’s more Bama than an individual coach. What Bama has that we don’t are successful coaches that stay a long, long time. Even Stallings was there 7 years and won 6 of 7 against us.


However, Bryant was 16-4 vs. LSU and Saban is now 10 and 3. So 26 of those wins (half) are attributable to 2 of the greatest coaches in CFB History. So it does correlate to coaching. If you look at NFL talent Bryant had from 1964 to 1982 the years he played LSU every year, it was not that much different from LSU. In fact, UGA under Dooley over that period was the biggest NFL producer of talent in the SEC. Bryant won with mostly Alabama kids and he outcoached everyone. He never had the kind of recruiting talent advantage Saban has. That is a fact. Go look it up if you don't believe. me.

Stallings was a good coach but went up against Archer (1-0), Curley (3-1),and DiNardo (2-0), each who only lasted 4 years at LSU and were fired. Again, better coach.

From 2000 to 2006. LSU was 6-1 vs. Alabama (Saban 4-1) and Miles 2-0 (vs. Shula). And if Matt Mauck doesn't get hurt in the Florida game in 2002, That team wasn't going to loose anymore. They were about to take off mid 2002 when they went in to Florida and blew the doors out against the Gators.

Saban is just a rare bird, NFL background from Bill Belichick coaching tree that can go anywhere and recruit and he will go anywhere to recruit and Bama will give him the recruiting budget to do so.

I poste this on another tread. Almost every player Bama has on their 2 deep is in the top 1 to 3 in their position group. Let's jus take from TE to RT. The TE is from New Orleans, the LT from California (was top LT prospect in Country, projected 1st round pick), Left Guard is local from Tuscaloosa (one of top guard prospects coming out of HS), Center was top Center prospect in Country and is from Iowa (projected 2nd round pick), the RG was the number 1 player out of Kentucky (from Lexington, right under UK's nose) and RT is from Florida (one of the top RT prospects out of HS. And the QB was the #1 prospect and is from Hawaii.


first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram