
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Score Board
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Interesting take from Murrill
Posted on 9/8/26 at 9:09 pm to bluestem75
Posted on 9/8/26 at 9:09 pm to bluestem75
If it’s one thing Louisiana does right it’s lawsuits
Posted on 9/8/26 at 9:16 pm to TigerFreddy
Every SEC school has sold million$ in ticket sales, vendor contracts rely on the income, their employees do, too. TV contract counts on those games being played, too. It wouldn't be just LSU fans and players that are affected.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 9:23 pm to bluestem75
Probably depends on if there is cause for the expulsion of LSU.
If LSU is found to be at fault and this fault leads to cause, then the lawsuits by the players, vendors, ticket holders, etc. are against LSU and not the SEC. And that is very bad for LSU.
If LSU is not at fault leading to an arbitrary decision by the SEC, then the lawsuits are against the SEC.
I don’t think the vote is successful if the Thursday meeting happens, but who sues who if LSU is out is an interesting topic.
If LSU is found to be at fault and this fault leads to cause, then the lawsuits by the players, vendors, ticket holders, etc. are against LSU and not the SEC. And that is very bad for LSU.
If LSU is not at fault leading to an arbitrary decision by the SEC, then the lawsuits are against the SEC.
I don’t think the vote is successful if the Thursday meeting happens, but who sues who if LSU is out is an interesting topic.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 9:32 pm to bluestem75
And LSU will have the Sherman Act against the SEC. So much litigation. The lawyers are salivating.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 9:34 pm to tgrgrd00
That would be if they equally applied their own rules.
The SEC bylaws will be their own downfall.
The SEC bylaws will be their own downfall.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 9:40 pm to Ebridg3
THIS. Once Saturday happened the bama powers are dead set on not letting the future take place. They’d rather burn it all to the ground. Even Pawl said live on his show Bama is in deep trouble financially being able to compete in the NIL era. He even stated Auburn is in better shape than they are. Bama knows what’s coming in what they can see and what they know behind the scenes and here we are the next week. A idiot making the best conference in the country look like a bunch of backwood retards. Sankey should be ousted Thursday if anything at all happened that should. Even Bama can’t be this blind to the look it’s giving the entire conference. The big10 is LOVING this shite and I gurantee a call to LSU has already been made by them and the ACC. I’d put money on it.
Posted on 9/9/26 at 6:16 am to Sun God
Knew there would be at least one that missed the humor!
Posted on 9/9/26 at 6:20 am to HubbaBubba
quote:
It wouldn't be just LSU fans and players that are affected.
It disenfranchises everyone in the league.
Posted on 9/9/26 at 6:21 am to Arbengal
quote:
There will be no winner.
Well, the lawyers always win, even if they lose.
Posted on 9/9/26 at 7:14 am to loogaroo
Exactly everyone that has is coming to town would be affected by it. Ole Miss being titty babies and not wanting to play us, fricks Oxford over. Also puts the sec at risk with its media deal.
Also if you kick LSU out for essentially doing nothing you aren’t getting an equal value school to replace them. You would have to get a smaller one and that would immediately piss off espn and it would lead to the sec not being worth near as much.
If the sec was smart, now that we added the players and filled our roster, drop this and let’s all move on.
Also if you kick LSU out for essentially doing nothing you aren’t getting an equal value school to replace them. You would have to get a smaller one and that would immediately piss off espn and it would lead to the sec not being worth near as much.
If the sec was smart, now that we added the players and filled our roster, drop this and let’s all move on.
Posted on 9/9/26 at 7:59 am to loogaroo
quote:Hoteliers would get fricked. Lotsa' businesses. Tent rental and setup companies would lose out on revenue. Tow truck operators would lose out in Baton Rouge, for sure.
It disenfranchises everyone in the league.
Posted on 9/9/26 at 9:51 am to Big4SALTbro
quote:
and that would immediately piss off espn
I think ABC and ESPN are quietly behind Skanky.
They want LSU and our administration to heel. I believe this is more political than just Skanky getting butthurt.
Posted on 9/9/26 at 9:57 am to oldskule
quote:
This is exactly why we need to go back to the student athlete format......this shite aint working!
I understand the sentiment but the old system was terrible.
When we were students we were free to transfer every semester, free to accept gifts, free to have outside income, and free to have meals with professionals in our intended field.
If you played a sport you lost all of those rights.
Posted on 9/9/26 at 10:36 am to bluestem75
Not sure the league has any privity with the individual athletes sufficient to provide the bases of suits.
Posted on 9/9/26 at 12:19 pm to dinner roll
LSU brought this on the teams and fans. No one else did it. LSU did it.
Posted on 9/9/26 at 12:21 pm to Zachary
You only need privity if it’s a contract claim. Plenty of other potential causes of action that aren’t contract related.
Posted on 9/9/26 at 12:24 pm to bluestem75
They don't know who they are messing with. Murrill will kick their arse in court.
Posted on 9/9/26 at 12:28 pm to Arbengal
quote:
litigation will be off the charts
Mutually assured destruction.

Popular
Back to top


0









