If LSU would have beaten Ole Miss, who would we have played in our bowl game?

quote:

---

It would have been nice to play in a meaningful bowl game

---

Unless you're in the playoff, none of the bowls have any meaning.

All bowl games meaningful when you are receiving millions to play in them

quote:

---

Lol Somebody doesn't understand the difference in payout for a NY6 bowl game compared to other bowls.

---

Don’t all the money get distributed evenly among SEC teams are am I dreaming this?

quote:

---

Don’t all the money get distributed evenly among SEC teams are am I dreaming this?

---

No, you are correct. All the bowl payouts go into a pot and get split evenly among conference members.

That OM game still stings. Up 9 with less than 9 minutes to play. 10-2 feels a lot better than 9-3.

Playing for 11 wins against a top 10 team means something. The idea that it’s not a playoff game so who cares is a bad look. Teams with all the opt outs show that program is not strong.

Nabors, Thomas, and Wingo playing shows we are in good hands. Getting 10 wins matters to them.

Last year Will Anderson and Bryce Young playing in the Sugar Bowl bc finishing the season with their teammates was important. In the grand scheme of championships I get the it means nothing crowd, but as far as your program going into the offseason with edge and positivity it means everything.

Maybe OSU. Look at the bowl game Missouri played in, and we BEAT them!

Yeah prob Ohio State since we beat Mizzou head to head.

Penn State would have been fun too.

Playing a 7-5 Wisconsin team doesn’t really stir any emotion

quote:

---

Yeah prob Ohio State since we beat Mizzou head to head.

---

THIS, we would have been higher ranked than Mizzou.

Let's take care of business vs WISC and hopefully see some star-Tigers for 2024 make their presence known.

The bowl payout is split into equal shares, but the team actually playing in the game receives two shares. Every other school, and the SEC office, gets one share.