re: I like Nuss, but We need a running QB.

Our two recent heisman winners both could run. Bryce will lead us to glory.

It’s obvious today’s offenses are built around mobile QB’s If he can throw a little it’s Lagniappe. Underwood by all accounts is the next Big Thing. Let’s see how that works out for us. Until then just enjoy the games

You think they are going to let Underwood run at will? Not hardly!

Was Mac/Stetson/JJ considered running QB’s ?? They won the last 4 NC’s.

quote:

---

And we don’t really know if he actually will play at LSU yet.

---

even if he does you want him as a TF on the road at Clemson next year to open the year.

A running game would help.

quote:

---

Was Mac/Stetson/JJ considered running QB’s ?? They won the last 4 NC’s.

---

Those offenses all had elite run games, which is really what we are missing. Being able to pull the ball on a read option should be more of a luxury than a need. But, when you have absolutely no productivity in your run game, it becomes much more important than it should be.

Nuss just being able to run for a first down when the entire defense is running with their back towards him is plenty good enough.

quote:

---

.what a pussy

---

yes you are keyboard warrior

100%

Mobile doesn’t mean running. Daniels was a running QB. Stetson/JJ were not considered running QB’s. Burrow was not considered a running QB even though he could run when needed. Those QB’s had a complimentary running game to go along with their passing skills. None of the last NC winners are Sellers/Reed/Daniels