Started By
Message

re: I guess our QB situation is better than UF today…

Posted on 11/30/22 at 7:24 pm to
Posted by SammyTiger
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2009
66885 posts
Posted on 11/30/22 at 7:24 pm to
Eeeeeeh

quote:

Police allege that an investigation revealed Kitna was the probable owner of the Discord account. The Gainesville Police Department said Kitna was interviewed by officers and that he told them he thought the images he shared were "legal" because he found them online. Police say they searched Kitna's electronic devices and found three more images of child sexual abuse material.


Best case scenario isn’t great
Posted by Geauxboy
NW Arkansas
Member since Oct 2006
4856 posts
Posted on 11/30/22 at 7:29 pm to
quote:

That could be an extremely misleading charge for a college kid


You are a sick frick


I see the word "could". I also read this as someone not rushing to judgement like this board (and country) are prone to do. I don't see a defense of the kid and I do not see a sick frick in this comment.
I do see a pretty judgmental person in you, however.
Posted by LSUSkip
Central, LA
Member since Jul 2012
17628 posts
Posted on 11/30/22 at 7:33 pm to
It sounds to me like he made a serious error in judgement, not that this is something he regularly engages in. Child abuse doesn't sound good at all but it is pretty vague. Either way, his career at Florida is likely over.
Posted by Tigerpride18
Lakewood Colorado
Member since Sep 2017
29564 posts
Posted on 11/30/22 at 7:37 pm to
Bruh
Posted by Forever
Member since Dec 2019
5753 posts
Posted on 11/30/22 at 7:41 pm to
quote:

All you had to do was read the link to know this wasn't the case

ESPN edited the article after my comment, moron
Posted by Havoc
Member since Nov 2015
28643 posts
Posted on 11/30/22 at 7:47 pm to
Seems like usually when they nail pedo types they have like hundreds or thousands of media content because it’s such a freak thing for them. 3 seems bizarre.
Posted by J2thaROC
Member since May 2018
13060 posts
Posted on 11/30/22 at 7:49 pm to
quote:

It just doesn’t make sense.



What about it doesn’t make sense?
Posted by drizztiger
Deal With it!
Member since Mar 2007
37543 posts
Posted on 11/30/22 at 7:51 pm to
quote:

Seems like usually when they nail pedo types they have like hundreds or thousands of media content because it’s such a freak thing for them. 3 seems bizarre.
quote:

3 seems bizarre.
How much child porn do you need to share to share child porn?
Posted by DRock88
Member since Aug 2015
9513 posts
Posted on 11/30/22 at 7:53 pm to
Napier has lost control of the program
Posted by moock blackjack
Member since Apr 2008
97087 posts
Posted on 11/30/22 at 7:57 pm to
Another dumb arse
Posted by Palomitz
Miami
Member since Oct 2009
2218 posts
Posted on 11/30/22 at 7:58 pm to
quote:

Either way, his career is over.


FIFY
Posted by LSUSkip
Central, LA
Member since Jul 2012
17628 posts
Posted on 11/30/22 at 7:58 pm to
quote:

How much child porn do you need to share to share child porn?


I think he means that the pedo types that get busted usually have thousands, so on the surface, it doesn't seem like he's a pedo. You usually don't hear about people sharing 3 files though. It's probably only news because he's a Florida QB.
Posted by drizztiger
Deal With it!
Member since Mar 2007
37543 posts
Posted on 11/30/22 at 8:12 pm to
quote:

I think he means that the pedo types that get busted usually have thousands, so on the surface, it doesn't seem like he's a pedo. You usually don't hear about people sharing 3 files though.
My answer to this is very simple. Stop them in their tracks. Sharing child porn is enough, no one gets rehabilitated from thinking about children sexually.
Posted by Havoc
Member since Nov 2015
28643 posts
Posted on 11/30/22 at 8:16 pm to
quote:

I think he means that the pedo types that get busted usually have thousands, so on the surface, it doesn't seem like he's a pedo. You usually don't hear about people sharing 3 files though. It's probably only news because he's a Florida QB.

Exactly. Thank you.
Posted by Scoob
Near Exxon
Member since Jun 2009
20477 posts
Posted on 11/30/22 at 8:37 pm to
quote:

Most likely just nudes from a Gf or ex GF whose under 18

We didn't have this tech when I was a kid.

I'm morbidly curious- what's the rule on what kids text each other? If you had a trashy girlfriend sending you stuff when you're both under age, do you need to delete that when you hit 18? Seems like that could be problematic for some folks.

It's been said a long time ago, but bears repeating- anything posted to the internet (and via messages etc, basically any electronic media) NEVER completely goes away.
Posted by mikelbr
Baton Rouge
Member since Apr 2008
47540 posts
Posted on 11/30/22 at 8:43 pm to

Yep chances are he was in possession of nudes or sex videos involving a 17 yr old chick.
Posted by MidCityTiger
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2004
660 posts
Posted on 11/30/22 at 9:08 pm to
quote:

I highly doubt an SEC QB who can get as many girls as he wants went full Sandusky on a 6 year old


What you don’t know about pedophiles could fill volumes.
Posted by Forever
Member since Dec 2019
5753 posts
Posted on 11/30/22 at 11:15 pm to
quote:

What you don’t know about pedophiles could fill volumes

.....good? Are you an expert on the inner workings of the pedophile mind or something?
Posted by DeathByTossDive225
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2019
3953 posts
Posted on 11/30/22 at 11:23 pm to
quote:

That could be an extremely misleading charge for a college kid. He’s 19, he could be in possession of pictures of a 16-year old ex that he got when he was 16. I’ll definitely hold off judgement on this one, I highly doubt an SEC QB who can get as many girls as he wants went full Sandusky on a 6 year old

This is some dumb shite. The FBI doesn’t come at you with distribution and possession charges over statutory.

Bunch of naive MFers or pedos in this thread. Wtf is wrong with ppl, immediate reaction to child porn charges = not so fast?

Wtaf.
This post was edited on 11/30/22 at 11:30 pm
Posted by TigerGM
Member since Nov 2014
1027 posts
Posted on 11/30/22 at 11:30 pm to
quote:

That could be an extremely misleading charge for a college kid. He’s 19, he could be in possession of pictures of a 16-year old ex that he got when he was 16. I’ll definitely hold off judgement on this one, I highly doubt an SEC QB who can get as many girls as he wants went full Sandusky on a 6 year old



Yeah. That’s not how this works.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram