Started By
Message

re: Hutson ruled ineligible for Texas

Posted on 9/7/26 at 2:48 pm to
Posted by saint tiger225
San Diego
Member since Jan 2011
49520 posts
Posted on 9/7/26 at 2:48 pm to
Probably waiting for LSU to work out the kinks for them
Posted by Vacherie Saint
Member since Aug 2015
48342 posts
Posted on 9/7/26 at 2:48 pm to
Isn’t there a kid at Tulane that played Saturday who went through multiple NFL camps? I could have sworn this was discussed on the broadcast, but Google has memory holed it.
Posted by Pedropatterstine
Member since Aug 2026
678 posts
Posted on 9/7/26 at 2:49 pm to
Lol...you think theybare going to punish texas....most likely help them out of the trouble.
Posted by White Tiger
Dallas
Member since Jul 2007
15856 posts
Posted on 9/7/26 at 2:49 pm to
It means that , like everything else in life, there are at least two sets of rulz. lol
Posted by armytiger96
Member since Sep 2007
3134 posts
Posted on 9/7/26 at 2:49 pm to
quote:

It means they are trying to stop all the questionable players except chambliss.


Chambliss withdrew from the draft and had nothing to do with the NFL so they have no grounds to bypass the courts TRO/injunction.
This post was edited on 9/7/26 at 3:31 pm
Posted by lsufanva
sandston virginia
Member since Aug 2009
13717 posts
Posted on 9/7/26 at 2:51 pm to
quote:

Why mention this without failing to mention that the appeals court ruled in favor of NCAA and issue a stay of execution against her injunction


Which is also the reason Hutson is inelgibke today. His particular case got a stay, meaning the entire lot of players in his case are ineligible.

The players we want are more eligible than he is. In fact the ND kid is still eligible. The intentional omissions tell the tale in all of this. We are being targeted.
Posted by Vacherie Saint
Member since Aug 2015
48342 posts
Posted on 9/7/26 at 2:53 pm to
This conference is a joke.
Pavia and Chambliss BOTH defy NCAA and SEC rulings to sue and return. Texas has a former NFL camper on their active roster. Even Tulane apparently has a dude who has camped with multiple NFL teams.

But they are going to banish LSU for talking about it?
Posted by LSUTIGAHS123
Member since Oct 2017
426 posts
Posted on 9/7/26 at 2:55 pm to
Half of Texas athletic should be distributed to the other 15 schools if we follow the threats from 15-0 vote.
Posted by Tiger1988
Houston
Member since May 2016
31125 posts
Posted on 9/7/26 at 2:56 pm to
I think the lSU with other SEC University presidents and State ADs ought to ban together and tell the SEC to remove Chambliss as it is not in line by rule with the principles everyone agreed to regardless of what a judge stated. 1/2 coaching season suspension and 1/2 loss of revenue
This post was edited on 9/7/26 at 2:57 pm
Posted by ItTakesAThief
Scottsdale, Arizona
Member since Dec 2009
10907 posts
Posted on 9/7/26 at 2:57 pm to

The Mannings probably are influencing the situation with Texas.

They do not want anything to stain or jeopardize this season for Arch and also Archie is probably playing the situation on both ends. On one side the anti LSU slant of the issue because of Ole Miss, so he does not want Texas with his grandson playing doing the opposite, even though Chambliss is NCAA ineligible but continuing to play for some odd reason although he should also be looked at as an ineligible NCAA player by the CFP and SEC.
Posted by FredbullTN
Houston
Member since Sep 2023
5841 posts
Posted on 9/7/26 at 2:59 pm to
quote:

I think the lSU with other SEC University presidents and State ADs ought to ban together and tell the SEC to remove Chambliss as it is not in line by rule with the principles everyone agreed to regardless of what a judge stated. 1/2 coaching season suspension and 1/2 loss of revenue


I mean he is taking the spot that some 18 year old freshman could have had
Posted by Vacherie Saint
Member since Aug 2015
48342 posts
Posted on 9/7/26 at 3:01 pm to
They won’t, but if this were really about principles and the spirit of the bylaws (it’s certainly not about the text of the bylaws) they might consider that.

It’s just ironic that they were “powerless” to the courts for Chambliss, NIL, etc. but this issue… one that they created… is the hill they want to die on? While a literal NFL camper played for one of the conference’s preseason favorites to win the championship. And they said nothing
Posted by Adam Banks
District 5
Member since Sep 2009
39075 posts
Posted on 9/7/26 at 3:04 pm to
quote:

Lol...you think theybare going to punish texas....most likely help them out of the trouble.




Oh they absolutely spoke to sark and Texas on account of the suit with us.



We were 100% going to use that.


It still doesn’t fix it but makes the double standard less egregious
Posted by DesertCajun
New Mexico
Member since Mar 2007
864 posts
Posted on 9/7/26 at 3:04 pm to
frick you Sark and Stankey. How come Tejas didn't get threatened
Posted by ItTakesAThief
Scottsdale, Arizona
Member since Dec 2009
10907 posts
Posted on 9/7/26 at 3:08 pm to
Who knows also Ohio State and the B1G may have threatened Texas with a “you may be in breach of contract” letter to hedge against a loss so they could later lobby that Texas had an ineligible player.
Posted by Pedropatterstine
Member since Aug 2026
678 posts
Posted on 9/7/26 at 4:57 pm to
Lmao except a guy faking an illness to get a SIXTH year of eligibility. You arent lsu no true lsu fan excused that
Posted by Pedropatterstine
Member since Aug 2026
678 posts
Posted on 9/7/26 at 4:58 pm to
But there are several others playing for sec teams
Posted by Pedropatterstine
Member since Aug 2026
678 posts
Posted on 9/7/26 at 5:01 pm to
Armytiger is rallying for chambliss. Wasting your time
Posted by JimTiger72
LA
Member since Jun 2023
20298 posts
Posted on 9/7/26 at 5:03 pm to
Interesting

He did not play against Texas State
Posted by Thorny
Montgomery, AL
Member since May 2008
2322 posts
Posted on 9/7/26 at 5:15 pm to
quote:

It disgusts me that lsu bowed down to that pos

I understand and somewhat agree with the emotion of this.

Legally, however, LSU did the right thing. It puts them in a much stronger position to make a response to the fed suit from a position of following SEC rules. It helps them say that the suit is frivolous and actually misleading.

Have to play the long game demonstrating that we always intended to comply, despite the narrative lies in the media driving so much of this whole thing.

JMHO.

GEAUX TIGERS!
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram