- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Hutson ruled ineligible for Texas
Posted on 9/7/26 at 2:48 pm to DustInTheWind
Posted on 9/7/26 at 2:48 pm to DustInTheWind
Probably waiting for LSU to work out the kinks for them 
Posted on 9/7/26 at 2:48 pm to Geauxgurt
Isn’t there a kid at Tulane that played Saturday who went through multiple NFL camps? I could have sworn this was discussed on the broadcast, but Google has memory holed it.
Posted on 9/7/26 at 2:49 pm to Adam Banks
Lol...you think theybare going to punish texas....most likely help them out of the trouble.
Posted on 9/7/26 at 2:49 pm to DustInTheWind
It means that , like everything else in life, there are at least two sets of rulz. lol
Posted on 9/7/26 at 2:49 pm to Pedropatterstine
quote:
It means they are trying to stop all the questionable players except chambliss.
Chambliss withdrew from the draft and had nothing to do with the NFL so they have no grounds to bypass the courts TRO/injunction.
This post was edited on 9/7/26 at 3:31 pm
Posted on 9/7/26 at 2:51 pm to armytiger96
quote:
Why mention this without failing to mention that the appeals court ruled in favor of NCAA and issue a stay of execution against her injunction
Which is also the reason Hutson is inelgibke today. His particular case got a stay, meaning the entire lot of players in his case are ineligible.
The players we want are more eligible than he is. In fact the ND kid is still eligible. The intentional omissions tell the tale in all of this. We are being targeted.
Posted on 9/7/26 at 2:53 pm to Pedropatterstine
This conference is a joke.
Pavia and Chambliss BOTH defy NCAA and SEC rulings to sue and return. Texas has a former NFL camper on their active roster. Even Tulane apparently has a dude who has camped with multiple NFL teams.
But they are going to banish LSU for talking about it?
Pavia and Chambliss BOTH defy NCAA and SEC rulings to sue and return. Texas has a former NFL camper on their active roster. Even Tulane apparently has a dude who has camped with multiple NFL teams.
But they are going to banish LSU for talking about it?
Posted on 9/7/26 at 2:55 pm to Walnut
Half of Texas athletic should be distributed to the other 15 schools if we follow the threats from 15-0 vote.
Posted on 9/7/26 at 2:56 pm to Geauxgurt
I think the lSU with other SEC University presidents and State ADs ought to ban together and tell the SEC to remove Chambliss as it is not in line by rule with the principles everyone agreed to regardless of what a judge stated. 1/2 coaching season suspension and 1/2 loss of revenue
This post was edited on 9/7/26 at 2:57 pm
Posted on 9/7/26 at 2:57 pm to Vacherie Saint
The Mannings probably are influencing the situation with Texas.
They do not want anything to stain or jeopardize this season for Arch and also Archie is probably playing the situation on both ends. On one side the anti LSU slant of the issue because of Ole Miss, so he does not want Texas with his grandson playing doing the opposite, even though Chambliss is NCAA ineligible but continuing to play for some odd reason although he should also be looked at as an ineligible NCAA player by the CFP and SEC.
Posted on 9/7/26 at 2:59 pm to Tiger1988
quote:
I think the lSU with other SEC University presidents and State ADs ought to ban together and tell the SEC to remove Chambliss as it is not in line by rule with the principles everyone agreed to regardless of what a judge stated. 1/2 coaching season suspension and 1/2 loss of revenue
I mean he is taking the spot that some 18 year old freshman could have had
Posted on 9/7/26 at 3:01 pm to Tiger1988
They won’t, but if this were really about principles and the spirit of the bylaws (it’s certainly not about the text of the bylaws) they might consider that.
It’s just ironic that they were “powerless” to the courts for Chambliss, NIL, etc. but this issue… one that they created… is the hill they want to die on? While a literal NFL camper played for one of the conference’s preseason favorites to win the championship. And they said nothing
It’s just ironic that they were “powerless” to the courts for Chambliss, NIL, etc. but this issue… one that they created… is the hill they want to die on? While a literal NFL camper played for one of the conference’s preseason favorites to win the championship. And they said nothing
Posted on 9/7/26 at 3:04 pm to Pedropatterstine
quote:
Lol...you think theybare going to punish texas....most likely help them out of the trouble.
Oh they absolutely spoke to sark and Texas on account of the suit with us.
We were 100% going to use that.
It still doesn’t fix it but makes the double standard less egregious
Posted on 9/7/26 at 3:04 pm to Geauxgurt
frick you Sark and Stankey. How come Tejas didn't get threatened
Posted on 9/7/26 at 3:08 pm to DesertCajun
Who knows also Ohio State and the B1G may have threatened Texas with a “you may be in breach of contract” letter to hedge against a loss so they could later lobby that Texas had an ineligible player.
Posted on 9/7/26 at 4:57 pm to armytiger96
Lmao except a guy faking an illness to get a SIXTH year of eligibility. You arent lsu no true lsu fan excused that
Posted on 9/7/26 at 4:58 pm to Adam Banks
But there are several others playing for sec teams
Posted on 9/7/26 at 5:01 pm to lsufanva
Armytiger is rallying for chambliss. Wasting your time
Posted on 9/7/26 at 5:03 pm to Geauxgurt
Interesting
He did not play against Texas State
He did not play against Texas State
Posted on 9/7/26 at 5:15 pm to Pedropatterstine
quote:
It disgusts me that lsu bowed down to that pos
I understand and somewhat agree with the emotion of this.
Legally, however, LSU did the right thing. It puts them in a much stronger position to make a response to the fed suit from a position of following SEC rules. It helps them say that the suit is frivolous and actually misleading.
Have to play the long game demonstrating that we always intended to comply, despite the narrative lies in the media driving so much of this whole thing.
JMHO.
GEAUX TIGERS!
Popular
Back to top


0




