Started By
Message

re: Greg Brooks Jr's attorney reacts to BK rebuttal:

Posted on 2/7/25 at 12:23 pm to
Posted by Chadwick
Member since Aug 2011
5397 posts
Posted on 2/7/25 at 12:23 pm to
quote:

damn. bad look for kelly


No, this is all just for a money grab, which is a shame.
Posted by El Jefe de Tu Mama
Over there by that place
Member since Dec 2024
1007 posts
Posted on 2/7/25 at 12:28 pm to
No. They need to litigate it. This is why you don't get to make important decisions.
Posted by Carter
Member since Nov 2003
3534 posts
Posted on 2/7/25 at 12:53 pm to
Yeah and every SEC coach will talk about Greg Brooks in recruiting against LSU.
Posted by EyeOfTheTiger311
Lafayette, LA
Member since Aug 2005
4594 posts
Posted on 2/7/25 at 1:13 pm to
quote:


The lawsuit has 0.0% chance to ever even make it to court. The attorney knows that

The attorney in order to try and get the money grab family money is trying to get lsu to pay jsut to make it go away

LSU needs to not do that and watch this “case” get crushed in summary judgment


This right here. 100%
Posted by 0
Member since Aug 2011
17512 posts
Posted on 2/7/25 at 4:05 pm to
quote:

Because he was experiencing recurring symptoms, sometimes more severe than others, sometimes not at all and he was being told that he was fine by trainers with orders signed off by Physicians that didnt see him without being referred to a Neurologist,


There are so many causes of Vertigo, with most of them being completely benign, that no doctor is going to immediately refer you a specialist unless it persists longer than they deem normal. I had it when i was in my mid 20s. When i went to the Dr for it, i was given nausea meds and told to come back if it lasts longer than 30 days or if its gets worse.

There is a difference between neglect and bad luck. No one is going to immediately assume brain cancer in an otherwise healthy 21 year old.
Posted by TigerGrad03
Member since Dec 2024
996 posts
Posted on 2/7/25 at 5:23 pm to
quote:

Yeah and every SEC coach will talk about Greg Brooks in recruiting against LSU.


That will happen anyway, so it's a non issue when making the decision.
This post was edited on 2/7/25 at 5:25 pm
Posted by Mandtgr47
Member since Aug 2024
7918 posts
Posted on 2/7/25 at 5:23 pm to
quote:


quote:
damn. bad look for kelly


No, this is all just for a money grab, which is a shame.


This is all this is, and to be honest, I hope LSU turns around and sues the shite out of them. I hate it for the kid, I honestly do, but this is just disgusting, what they are trying to do. I get it, the family was hoping for their kid to set them all up in life. But, it isn't like this was an LSU thing, at all...and to try and make it one says everything about the scum that they are.
Posted by p226
Lafayette
Member since Sep 2016
2146 posts
Posted on 2/7/25 at 5:26 pm to
quote:

damn. bad look for kelly.


What infuriates me about this is CBK could have said NOTHING. He should have said “no comment”, “can’t discuss it”. Which he did when asked, then started adding shite.

He brought this on himself, now he’s in a public dispute with a plaintiff’s attorney that he will NEVER win.

All downside, and no upside, for CBK and the program to respond to this.

But he couldn’t shut up.

He’s dealt with media for decades, but he still has trouble with it.
Posted by LSUfan4444
Member since Mar 2004
56656 posts
Posted on 2/7/25 at 5:56 pm to
quote:

There are so many causes of Vertigo, with most of them being completely benign, that no doctor is going to immediately refer you a specialist unless it persists longer than they deem normal. I had it when i was in my mid 20s. When i went to the Dr for it, i was given nausea meds and told to come back if it lasts longer than 30 days or if its gets worse.




But you saw a doctor, that’s the point. Did you even read the lawsuit?
Posted by Wayne Campbell
Aurora, IL
Member since Oct 2011
7160 posts
Posted on 2/7/25 at 6:10 pm to
quote:

But you saw a doctor, that’s the point. Did you even read the lawsuit?


Who stopped Brooks from seeing a doctor?
Posted by RB10
Member since Nov 2010
51036 posts
Posted on 2/7/25 at 6:13 pm to
quote:

But you saw a doctor, that’s the point. Did you even read the lawsuit?


What stopped Brooks from seeing a doctor?

Oh yeah, his choice not to do so.
Posted by Carter
Member since Nov 2003
3534 posts
Posted on 2/7/25 at 6:18 pm to
'non issue'
Posted by Manswers
Michigan
Member since Feb 2009
3729 posts
Posted on 2/7/25 at 6:22 pm to
I have not been following this lawsuit but what are they claiming are the damages? Did BK do something to cause the tumor to not be diagnosed earlier? I see a claim that BK did not contact Brooks since 2023 but is the basis of the lawsuit? I'm probably missing something but what the lawyer and the Dad are saying doesn't seem to be relevant to Brooks' injury.
Posted by IndianMoundFireworks
Member since Oct 2021
826 posts
Posted on 2/7/25 at 6:23 pm to
Why does it matter when Brian Kelly last made contact with Greg Brooks? Who cares? He’s not his caretaker and isn’t beholden to him. He’s his football coach. He visited him after his surgery. Done. Beyond that why SHOULD anyone care? It means nothing.
Posted by Red Stick Tigress
Tiger Stadium
Member since Nov 2005
20435 posts
Posted on 2/7/25 at 6:39 pm to
quote:

What stopped Brooks from seeing a doctor


Nothing. As an athlete, I assume he was used to everything being done for him or catered to by trainers and staff and didn't tell his parents he wasn't feeling well. Surely his mom would have told him to go to a doctor...
Posted by JPLSU1981
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2005
28330 posts
Posted on 2/7/25 at 6:47 pm to
quote:

I'm probably missing something but what the lawyer and the Dad are saying doesn't seem to be relevant to Brooks' injury.



You’re not missing anything.

They’re looking for someone to blame for an unfortunate/sad medical situation that has nothing to do with football.

And it’s a pretty logical guess that the family is not handling the potential loss of his future football earnings well.
This post was edited on 2/7/25 at 6:50 pm
Posted by Mandtgr47
Member since Aug 2024
7918 posts
Posted on 2/7/25 at 6:52 pm to
quote:

You are not an LSU fan. You are a "drama media' fan.



I think he was banging the interior decorator...until BK got ahold of her.
Posted by bass
Member since Oct 2016
4725 posts
Posted on 2/7/25 at 10:44 pm to
I’m sorry but I don’t understand why it’s important that Brian Kelly is there holding his hand for the past 16 months.
Posted by JPLSU1981
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2005
28330 posts
Posted on 2/7/25 at 10:47 pm to
quote:

I’m sorry but I don’t understand why it’s important that Brian Kelly is there holding his hand for the past 16 months.


It’s not. In any legal or practical sense.

They’re using the only lever they’ve got…. PR/media pressure

BK don’t give a shite about the legal proceedings, he knows that’s covered and will work itself out by LSU, lawyers and the insurance company. Dude is pissed about the attack on character and integrity, hence the press conference. He didn’t have to do that press conference, and was likely advised not to do so…..because this is a nothing-burger in the legal world, but the fact that he did shows that he’s fricking pissed.

It’s clear to anyone with a brain you’ve got a family that is 1) processing what is happening and understandably emotional and 2)looking for someone to blame and more importantly a payout. Honestly I don’t blame them as long as they don’t pay anything out of pocket … certainly worth a try.


Trying to apply PR pressure…. Maybe it will work, maybe it won’t. Either way, it’s an unfortunate/sad situation that will inevitably work itself out.

I’m not a PR expert, but it appears to me that newsworthy stuff about this situation tends to die within 24-48 hours, even when national media, so they may have a bigger hill to climb than the plaintiffs attorneys initially thought. It doesn’t seem to be attracting a big support group other than “yeah that’s a sad situation”
This post was edited on 2/7/25 at 11:32 pm
Posted by bass
Member since Oct 2016
4725 posts
Posted on 2/7/25 at 11:23 pm to
I can see how this may look like a money grab lawsuit but I also think the Brooks family could have a case.

If I had a child that needed surgery to remove a brain tumor OLOL Hospital would probably be closer to the bottom of my list in treatment centers.

Not because this hospital is a bad hospital but because research will tell you there are far better centers and surgeons elsewhere.

This is pure speculation but since this was such a highly publicized case; if LSU or OLOL stood to benefit financially from the successful removal of Brooks brain tumor, then they also stand to suffer financially from the unsuccessful results of the surgery from anything that could’ve been done better.

So that’s where the Brooks case has merit. If it was a failed coordinated effort from the school and hospital staff that victimized a family then yes they should sue. But subpar medical treatment should be proven as well.

This post was edited on 2/8/25 at 7:44 am
Jump to page
Page First 10 11 12 13 14 ... 20
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 12 of 20Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram