- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Examining the calls at the end of the game ...
Posted on 11/26/18 at 1:15 pm to LSUsmartass
Posted on 11/26/18 at 1:15 pm to LSUsmartass
They picked up the flag and said play the down over. That false flag screwed the tigers out of a sack for loss in overtime.
0
Posted on 11/26/18 at 1:19 pm to Buda
You will get down-voted for this very objective, logical, well presented post. Kudos for doing it anyway!
Posted on 11/26/18 at 1:37 pm to Big EZ Tiger
He catches the ball, turns downfield and begins advancing the ball. The kicker is, his grasp was maintained at the initial contact, which is another indicator of possession, (the second or even third present here, after tucking it and advancing it). It was in the next instant that the ball was knocked out.
Catch, turn, tuck, advance, make contact, then the ball’s out.
Catch, turn, tuck, advance, make contact, then the ball’s out.
Posted on 11/26/18 at 2:21 pm to Godfather1
Snap was at 1 second, and absolutely no time elapsed from taking the snap to downing the ball? Did time stop? We are talking about a tenth of a second. There is no way a full second should be put on the clock.
This post was edited on 11/26/18 at 2:23 pm
Posted on 11/26/18 at 2:23 pm to Game2620
Posted on 11/26/18 at 2:25 pm to LSUERDOC
quote:
Watch how long the clock reads 1sec...
Because that gif is slowed down at that point.
Posted on 11/26/18 at 2:28 pm to Mo Jeaux
IMO, the worst call was STernberger's FUMBLE. Game over LSU wins 34-31. It was not simply a 50-50 judgment call. It was a classic catch and fumble by any definition.
Posted on 11/26/18 at 2:29 pm to BTRDD
quote:surely you realize that the clock will only change to :00 when the entire second elapses. This isn't basketball, where the clock shows tenths of seconds.
Snap was at 1 second, and absolutely no time elapsed from taking the snap to downing the ball? Did time stop? We are talking about a tenth of a second. There is no way a full second should be put on the clock.
A snap can occur at :01 and the ball can hit the ground, both at :01. But that doesn't mean the clock didn't move. It just didn't move all the way down to zero.
This post was edited on 11/26/18 at 2:32 pm
Posted on 11/26/18 at 2:50 pm to atltiger6487
quote:
quote:
Snap was at 1 second, and absolutely no time elapsed from taking the snap to downing the ball? Did time stop? We are talking about a tenth of a second. There is no way a full second should be put on the clock.
quote:see, this is what I just love about this board - people downvoting factual statements.
surely you realize that the clock will only change to :00 when the entire second elapses. This isn't basketball, where the clock shows tenths of seconds.
A snap can occur at :01 and the ball can hit the ground, both at :01. But that doesn't mean the clock didn't move. It just didn't move all the way down to zero.
The way the clock works is that it won't hit :00 until there's literally no time left. So when the clock shows :01, there's actually (if we use hundredths) between .00 and 1.00 seconds left.
So the snap could've occurred at .99 seconds and the ball hit the ground at .01 seconds, but the scoreboard clock would still show :01.
Don't know how someone can downvote a fact.
Posted on 11/26/18 at 2:53 pm to GoldenBoy
quote:should be a clock runoff in this scenario...they need to add that to the rules...somehow..
The problem is how it was enforced. They stop the clock and that allows Texas A&M to reset.
ETA: oops, forgot they ran off time on that play...thought it was after a penalty.
This post was edited on 11/26/18 at 5:40 pm
Posted on 11/26/18 at 2:56 pm to Buda
So you just basically agreed to everything that NFL ref said in Advocate article and passed it off as your own. And then to claim superior football intellect when someone disagrees with you? Get the frick outta here douchebag.
Posted on 11/26/18 at 2:57 pm to Chicken
quote:they did - a 10 second runoff.
should be a clock runoff in this scenario...they need to add that to the rules...somehow
Posted on 11/26/18 at 3:01 pm to Chicken
quote:
should be a clock runoff in this scenario...they need to add that to the rules...somehow
I just don’t see a way to truly simulate the runoff, so they give them a 10 second runoff and call it a day.
The only real way to avoid getting into these situations where the refs truly can’t make both teams whole is to not have them subject to review.
Posted on 11/26/18 at 3:02 pm to Buda
quote:yes.. not tough.. easy....
Were they all set? And were there 7 men on the line? Tough call
Posted on 11/26/18 at 3:04 pm to LSUsmartass
quote:
I think that was a delay of game, and it was correct
No, I don't think so. It was when the A&M back was moving parallel to the line before the snap and they stopped the play in the middle of it to call a procedure penalty. But then they picked up the flag. The result of the play was negated.
Posted on 11/26/18 at 3:05 pm to Buda
quote:
4) The Sternberger fumble/incompletion. Very much a judgment call. The review was correct not to overturn because it was called incomplete on the field. The original call could have gone either way and, whichever way it went, the review would not have overturned. Unfortunate 50-50 call.
The review?? What review? Did you watch the game? Plays like that you let them play on then take it to the replay booth if it needs to be overturned. The bullshite part is that they didn’t even review it. How in the hell in the second overtime do you not review a “50/50 play” (wasn’t even close at all it was a fumble). They were 110% sure it wasn’t a fumble?? Total BS. They go back and find that mond’s knee was down but don’t review the biggest play of the entire game? BS
Posted on 11/26/18 at 3:19 pm to Boudreau34
My issue is that if you are going to call the Sternberger catch incomplete because he didn't have possession how can you say that Mond had possession when he was trying to pick up the ball.
Posted on 11/26/18 at 3:58 pm to Boudreau34
quote:The booth reviews every play, and calls down when they need more time. I suppose they saw it live and then saw a quick replay and thought it was correctly called.
The review?? What review? Did you watch the game? Plays like that you let them play on then take it to the replay booth if it needs to be overturned. The bullshite part is that they didn’t even review it. How in the hell in the second overtime do you not review a “50/50 play” (wasn’t even close at all it was a fumble).
Posted on 11/26/18 at 4:12 pm to GeorgeWest
Sternberger’s reaction is the most telling sign. He was pounding the ground. He knew he fumbled.
On incompletions, the receiver almost always gets up and starts signally incomplete frantically.
On incompletions, the receiver almost always gets up and starts signally incomplete frantically.
Posted on 11/30/18 at 12:25 am to pvilleguru
I doubt it very seriously.
Page 5 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News