Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

Even Guilbeau is arguing against Sankey?

Posted on 8/27/26 at 6:16 pm
Posted by tigerskin
Member since Nov 2004
47061 posts
Posted on 8/27/26 at 6:16 pm
Oh my. Yes it just randomly appeared in my feed

Posted by Byrdybyrd05
Member since Nov 2014
26573 posts
Posted on 8/27/26 at 6:20 pm to
What the hell is going on that I am agreeing with Guilbeau!
Posted by TBoy@LSU
Member since Sep 2012
6337 posts
Posted on 8/27/26 at 6:29 pm to
quote:

I am agreeing with Guilbeau!


It's trap.

This post was edited on 8/27/26 at 6:31 pm
Posted by mdomingue
Lafayette, LA
Member since Nov 2010
48852 posts
Posted on 8/27/26 at 6:35 pm to
quote:

quote:

I am agreeing with Guilbeau!



It's trap.
Posted by Former_5_Star
Member since Sep 2025
372 posts
Posted on 8/27/26 at 7:06 pm to
thanks for sharing b/c I definitely muted that douche bag years ago so that he doesn’t appear on my feed.
Posted by JoseyWalesLA
Texas
Member since Dec 2012
227 posts
Posted on 8/27/26 at 7:11 pm to
I wish we could ban any usage of the moron Guilbeau...he's useless and has zero inside scoop.

Also, he has such a punchable face.. I'd like to shove a large roast beef Po-Boy, dressed of course, in his face.
Posted by Swamp Frog x
Member since Nov 2024
1116 posts
Posted on 8/27/26 at 7:12 pm to
I seriously don’t understand why this is such a big deal. A couple guys that are within the age range of the 5 for 5 rules and haven’t played a season of pro sports. Doesn’t sound controversial to me at all.

Are they really just that scared of setting any precedent at all?
Posted by StTiger
Baton Rouge
Member since Nov 2008
3230 posts
Posted on 8/27/26 at 7:25 pm to
quote:

I seriously don’t understand why this is such a big deal. A couple guys that are within the age range of the 5 for 5 rules and haven’t played a season of pro sports. Doesn’t sound controversial to me at all.

Are they really just that scared of setting any precedent at all?


1. It's bullshite they and the media keep calling them "nfl players" when not a single one of them has made the 53 man roster yet

2. If you came to me and said you were an NFL pro because you spent 3 weeks at training camp, I'd laugh. It's a much less serious stolen valor

3. NCAA is doing it on purpose to force Congress to act and in turn, give the NCAA governing power by law so they can be bitches full time with actual enforcement
This post was edited on 8/27/26 at 7:26 pm
Posted by JayVegas702
Las Vegas
Member since Oct 2025
640 posts
Posted on 8/27/26 at 7:28 pm to
quote:

like to shove a large roast beef Po-Boy, dressed of course, in his face.




Sounds delicious right now tbh

Also, frick gg
Posted by tigerskin
Member since Nov 2004
47061 posts
Posted on 8/27/26 at 7:29 pm to
The judges haven't been playing along with this outdated amateur versus pro farce in their rulings

They know the distinction is an outdated joke based on the money involved

Thus they rule to not restrict player earnings wherever that may be
This post was edited on 8/27/26 at 7:33 pm
Posted by SECmeister
Member since Mar 2021
18 posts
Posted on 8/27/26 at 8:24 pm to
What choice Sankey have? He works directly for the 16 schools thst make up the conference. All 16 of those schools voted not to allow the named classification of professional players to return to college athletics. Sankey hss no choice, but to enforce the mandate of the conference. Failure to do so would probably get him fired.
Posted by Keltic Tiger
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2006
22360 posts
Posted on 8/27/26 at 9:06 pm to
Precedent? What about the hundreds of professional basketball players from Europe who have been players here? CKM's last 2 signees are from Spain & Russia.
Posted by geauxbrown
Louisiana
Member since Oct 2006
28102 posts
Posted on 8/27/26 at 10:19 pm to
Welcome to bazaro world
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram