Started By
Message
locked post

ESPN: Matchups, not pecking order, got LSU

Posted on 12/3/12 at 1:11 pm
Posted by Ghostfacedistiller
BR
Member since Jun 2008
17500 posts
Posted on 12/3/12 at 1:11 pm
This appears to have just come out...Pretty much what we've been saying..

quote:

BATON ROUGE, La. -- There were angry LSU fans Sunday when word leaked out that the Tigers had dropped all the way to the Chick-fil-A Bowl to face Clemson on New Year’s Eve.

It’s an outrage, they said. How is an LSU team ranked No. 8 in the BCS rankings No. 6 in the SEC pecking order?

Fair question. The Chick-fil-A Bowl is tied to the No. 5 team out of the SEC, which, as usual, became No. 6 this year after two SEC teams qualified for BCS bowl game.

If you compared results among the six SEC teams with double-digit wins, it’s hard to rationalize LSU being the sixth choice among those teams.

There are two one-loss SEC teams -- No. 2 Alabama, which will play in the Discover BCS National Championship game, and No. 3 Florida, which will play in the Allstate Sugar Bowl. Both deserved their spots.

Of the teams with two losses or fewer, only Florida (3-1) and LSU (2-2) played four of them, with the Tigers going 2-0 against fellow two-loss teams.

LSU beat South Carolina and Texas A&M, two teams that were invited to bowls higher in the pecking order than the Chick-fil-A. A&M landed the much-coveted Cotton Bowl spot despite losing to LSU at College Station.

It would seem that would put LSU, which is also the second-highest ranked two-loss SEC team (behind Georgia, which suffered its second loss to Alabama in the SEC championship game) at the top of the pecking order.

But, the bowl invitation process is often a beauty contest based on who looks like it can put hind-ends in seats, bodies in hotel beds and eyes on the tube.

LSU seems to have lost those battles this year.


After Georgia played Alabama to the wire Saturday, coming within five yards of the BCS title game, it became a more attractive choice for the Capital One to play Nebraska. The game in Orlando has a long history of favoring Eastern Division teams.

When Oklahoma was knocked out of the BCS by Northern Illinois’ inclusion, the Sooners got the Big 12’s AT&T Cotton Bowl bid, making it easy for the Cotton to invite Texas A&M. If OU had gone, as many expected, to the Sugar Bowl, Texas would have landed in the Cotton.

LSU would have been the likely Cotton choice if Texas were the opponent since many thought the SEC didn’t want to see the Texas-Texas A&M matchup. But with Texas out of the Cotton Bowl, getting the home-state Aggies to Arlington made sense.

That left the Outback and Chick-fil-A next in the SEC pecking order with two 10-2 teams, LSU and South Carolina, remaining.

Because Clemson is tied to the Chick-fil-A as the ACC’s No. 2 team, it became unlikely that the bowl would want a rematch with South Carolina, which beat the Tigers in the regular-season finale.

So it made sense: South Carolina to Tampa to play Michigan and LSU to Atlanta.

It could be worse.

As for facing Clemson, it lost a little luster with a loss to South Carolina in its regular-season finale. But with Tajh Boyd, the Tigers have a passing game that can test LSU’s young secondary. It will also be the only game going New Year’s Eve.

It might take a while for LSU fans to warm up to it, but it’s a matchup Tigers fans will eventually embrace.

LINK
Posted by RonFNSwanson
University of LSU
Member since Mar 2012
23150 posts
Posted on 12/3/12 at 1:14 pm to
but what they don't mention is how Les refused to play Michigan in the Outback Bowl
Posted by TigerStripes06
SWLA
Member since Sep 2006
30032 posts
Posted on 12/3/12 at 1:16 pm to
So basically, the cap one and outback didnt take us because they knew we'd blow out the teams we'd be matched up against? Got it.
Posted by I-59 Tiger
Vestavia Hills, AL
Member since Sep 2003
36703 posts
Posted on 12/3/12 at 1:16 pm to
Again, especially under Mike Slive, I can't think of a situation in the last 4 yrs where the SEC had an opportunity to assist LSU and did so. Chik-Fil-A is a good bowl and Georgia Dome is a great venue. But the "screw you,LSU" attitude from the SEC wears on you after a while.
Posted by Choupique19
The cheap seats
Member since Sep 2005
61732 posts
Posted on 12/3/12 at 1:18 pm to
quote:

Matchups


Ah, yes, matchups. What a no-story, boring game a Les Miles vs. Michigan would have been.
Posted by Gizmeaux
Member since Dec 2009
4997 posts
Posted on 12/3/12 at 1:18 pm to
Posted by Gray Tiger
Prairieville, LA
Member since Jan 2004
36512 posts
Posted on 12/3/12 at 1:19 pm to
quote:

but what they don't mention is how Les refused to play Michigan in the Outback Bowl

Les said that!! WOW.
Please supply a source for me. That is big news.
Thanks
Posted by TedStickles
Member since Feb 2008
1458 posts
Posted on 12/3/12 at 1:20 pm to
quote:

it became unlikely that the bowl would want a rematch


Where was this last year?
Posted by Jim Rockford
Member since May 2011
98082 posts
Posted on 12/3/12 at 1:24 pm to
quote:

Again, especially under Mike Slive, I can't think of a situation in the last 4 yrs where the SEC had an opportunity to assist LSU and did so. Chik-Fil-A is a good bowl and Georgia Dome is a great venue. But the "screw you,LSU" attitude from the SEC wears on you after a while.


This. The chicken bowl would be easier to take if we'd received any consideration in the past.
Posted by Jim Rockford
Member since May 2011
98082 posts
Posted on 12/3/12 at 1:27 pm to
And Slive is just a figurehead for the cabal that runs the league office. IIRC, Slive's retiring in 2014, but he'll be replace by another puppet and nothing will change.
Posted by mlminbtr
Baton Rouge
Member since Nov 2003
649 posts
Posted on 12/3/12 at 1:40 pm to
quote:

Again, especially under Mike Slive, I can't think of a situation in the last 4 yrs where the SEC had an opportunity to assist LSU and did so. Chik-Fil-A is a good bowl and Georgia Dome is a great venue. But the "screw you,LSU" attitude from the SEC wears on you after a while.


I think this just might answer some of your questions...

quote:

BIRMINGHAM, Ala. ? Mark Womack is the Executive Associate Commissioner of the Southeastern Conference and has been at the SEC since 1978. In addition to his role as the conference's chief financial officer, one of his responsibilities in the league office is serving as the liaison to the conference athletics directors and working with scheduling for the sport of football. Mark Womack, Executive Associate Commissioner, Southeastern Conference MAY 12, 2010 Mark Womack joined the Southeastern Conference staff in 1978 upon graduation from the University of Alabama and has served the conference in numerous capacities ranging from Assistant Public Relations Director to Acting Commissioner. While at Alabama, Womack worked in the athletic department's sports information office for two years before receiving his degree in Communications with a major in Public Relations and a minor in Promotional Management. Womack grew up in Tuscaloosa, Alabama and attended Tuscaloosa High school where he was a three-year starter at quarterback, leading his team to the semifinals of the state championship his senior year.
Posted by lsutigers1992
Member since Mar 2006
25317 posts
Posted on 12/3/12 at 1:41 pm to
Did the story mention how LSU is making the same 8-hour road trip for the 5th time in 15 years?

shite, if they're going to make us drive forever to get to a crappy bowl, why don't they just send us to Nashville for a change of scenery?
Posted by nf
Portland, OR
Member since Oct 2012
520 posts
Posted on 12/3/12 at 1:41 pm to
This has nothing do with the SEC, the bowls pick who they want to pick, and they didn't want LSU because there were better matchups to be made with other teams.

If you want to whine about anything, whine about the fact that the team let two winnable games slip out of their hands and played like garbage at the end of the year, leaving an unfavorable impression on bowl committees.
Posted by otowntiger
O-Town
Member since Jan 2004
15648 posts
Posted on 12/3/12 at 1:45 pm to
Why should we embrace a game against a weak disrespected team that has a chance to beat us because they have a great passing game and our secondary sucks? What element in any of that does anything to excite Tiger fans?? Seriously. I get that they will provide matchup problems for us but that's not something to look forward to as an LSU fan. Maybe more neutral fans will watch because it seems like a better game than the Orange, Rose and even Sugar but it doesn't mean its in the best interest of LSU.
This post was edited on 12/3/12 at 1:46 pm
Posted by Choupique19
The cheap seats
Member since Sep 2005
61732 posts
Posted on 12/3/12 at 1:56 pm to
quote:

This has nothing do with the SEC, the bowls pick who they want to pick, and they didn't want LSU because there were better matchups to be made with other teams.


Where have you been the last 30 hours??? The SEC definitely stepped in to "protect" UGA. They were plummeting to the Chick Fila Bowl, and LSU was set to go to the Cotton Bowl.
Posted by MoreOrLes
Member since Nov 2008
19472 posts
Posted on 12/3/12 at 2:01 pm to
quote:

But, the bowl invitation process is often a beauty contest based on who looks like it can put hind-ends in seats, bodies in hotel beds and eyes on the tube.

LSU seems to have lost those battles this year.




WHAT IN THE F..K???????

Last year we got screwed. The BCS says on its own website that "The reward for wins in the regular season is the bowl games." Thats how "they" justify not having a playoff. We all know what our "Reward" was last year.

Terms like:

Eyeball Test
Quality Loss
Two Best Teams
were last years f.ck job phrases.


This year its "Division Winner" and
"Beauty Contest"



IDGAF who says what. THIS is the type of shite that makes me appreciate no longer watching ESPN.


Posted by Baloo
Formerly MDGeaux
Member since Sep 2003
49645 posts
Posted on 12/3/12 at 2:15 pm to
quote:

Ah, yes, matchups. What a no-story, boring game a Les Miles vs. Michigan would have been.

Or, the two most winningnest programs in college football who have never played. Who would want to see that?

When we lose head to head, they tell us its about head to head. When we win head to head, they tell us its about matchups. It's bullshite. It's about sending LSU to a lesser bowl every goddamn time.

The SEC treats us like crap.
Posted by Ghostfacedistiller
BR
Member since Jun 2008
17500 posts
Posted on 12/3/12 at 2:20 pm to
quote:

The SEC treats us like crap.


What I see as a legitimate beef with the SEC is how they, by multiple reports, went to bat for UGA to get them into the Cap One, when really they didn't have to, as it serves not advantage. As such, the favor is never returned, to us, see 2005 as an example.

Everyone blames Bama for the scheduling, but it's them, Auburn, UT, and UGA. It's a consistant theme. I would be nice if the SEC stuck up for our interests more than it appears. I can't think of a single time they have.
Posted by spslayto
Member since Feb 2004
19683 posts
Posted on 12/3/12 at 2:27 pm to
quote:

What I see as a legitimate beef with the SEC is how they, by multiple reports, went to bat for UGA to get them into the Cap One, when really they didn't have to, as it serves not advantage. As such, the favor is never returned, to us, see 2005 as an example.


Agreed. That's the problem--we were a one-loss team going into the SEC title game and lost to Georgia. SEC didn't pressure any other bowl to take LSU that year and we drop to the Peach. I don't care what any other poster says, it is clear the SEC plays favorites.
Posted by ThePoo
Work
Member since Jan 2007
60575 posts
Posted on 12/3/12 at 2:29 pm to
Why is the fact uga played a close game with bama even a factor?

As though LSU wasn't beating bama with just seconds left while also not giving up over 500 yards of offense

It's like they are saying they were expecting UGA to not hang with bama like LSU or a&m but they kept it closer than they expected thus they were so caught off guard that they were thinking "woooooah we gotta help uga"..."their resume isn't as good but they played so far above their
Heads against bama that it would be ashame not to reward such heart and effort"
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram