- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Correct me if I’m wrong but
Posted on 8/24/26 at 8:19 pm
Posted on 8/24/26 at 8:19 pm
This situation we’re in right now regarding granting a 5th year of eligibility after many of these athletes had already made pro intention is just a single year issue……right? Going forward everyone will be aware of the 5th year and will have to make decisions accordingly.
6
Posted on 8/24/26 at 8:21 pm to tiger786
I thought the 5th year was for covid kids
Posted on 8/24/26 at 8:21 pm to tiger786
Only this senior class and only players that have used 4 years of eligibility
Posted on 8/24/26 at 8:23 pm to tiger786
Posted on 8/24/26 at 8:24 pm to tiger786
Yes and it’s the NCAAs fault. They thought their bill wouldn’t get stalled where it did which opened up this whole can of worms. But it’s basically just for this year with the 2022 class
Posted on 8/24/26 at 8:30 pm to More beer please
Everyone making a big issue about nothing. Just correcting a NCAA screw up. One year deal. Because LSU is involved it’s like the end of the world. If other schools were involved it probably wouldn’t even be mentioned,
This post was edited on 8/24/26 at 8:35 pm
Posted on 8/24/26 at 8:31 pm to tiger786
This could all be a non issue if the NCAA just admitted their mistake and acknowledged that yes this will be an anomaly this year.
Instead they dug their heels in and now it’s a bigger deal than it really is.
Instead they dug their heels in and now it’s a bigger deal than it really is.
Posted on 8/24/26 at 8:32 pm to More beer please
quote:What is the proposed legislation?
They thought their bill wouldn’t get stalled where it did which opened up this whole can of worms.
Posted on 8/24/26 at 8:34 pm to tiger786
The RJ Luis ruling concerns me. I think that sets a pretty bad precedent moving forward.
Posted on 8/24/26 at 9:30 pm to LSBoosie
quote:Combining this statement with the sentiment of the OP, you make a good point. From the position that he made a decision to go pro when he still had 1 year of eligibility remaining. Seems to me RJ waived his remaining college eligibility to pursue the NBA. Whereas Dae’Quan Wright and the like did not.
The RJ Luis ruling concerns me.
Love it for LSU, don’t like it for the future of college athletics. I’d be happy if I’m missing an important puzzle piece to the RJ Luis case.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News