re: Congress sends wide-ranging questions to LSU President and Southern California President

[quote]LINK ]

Easy response:

Dear Rep. Pascrell,

Worry about your district in New Jersey. Furthermore, eat a dick.

Yours Truly,

Pres. Tate

I'm pretty sure his actual payment from the university us $400,000. The rest is from private donations and incentives. No one is stopping people from donating money to the university for educational reasons. This is a non issue.

quote:

---

So, they are completely fine with CEO's of compainies getting $100 million dollar bonuses and politicians using insider trading information to make millions upon millions

---

While at the same time make corporate decisions to have mass layoffs and put a freeze on raises and bonuses because "it was a bad year". I would think since we're (they) are saying that it's ok to stick their nose in somebody's business to put it on blast, that would be the first order of business.

So just another asshat that doesn't understand that Brian Kelly's salary from LSU is only around $450k, not $10M.
Mind your own fricking business dumbass and quit telling private companies and citizens what to do with their money.

Isn’t Alabama the prime example of winning football championships benefiting the entire university? Sure they are.

And for every dollar every dollar Kelly gets from LSU, he has to pay the Feds about 34%. The Feds make out really well.

Democrats ruin everything.

Maybe he should start by digging into his peers if he is worried about questionable tax benefits , too much money being made on stocks, gaining net worth in the hundreds of millions on a 150 grand salary, etc

They want that “Tax” money!! It’s always about money for those money grubbing B$&@?!D’s

quote:

---

Pascrell’s letters ask LSU and USC to respond by Jan. 14 to a set of nearly 30, wide-ranging questions about their athletics programs and finances.

---

Tate’s response should be:

Did A&M get a list of questions after Jimbo’s contract?