- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Coach O Is Crushing It
Posted on 2/21/19 at 2:24 pm to RB10
Posted on 2/21/19 at 2:24 pm to RB10
quote:
I think it's hilarious that you think your hypotheticals are somehow more relevant than someone else's.
Well, anyone who understands football would agree a better passing game could easily have saved Les's arse.
3
Posted on 2/21/19 at 2:25 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Well, anyone who understands football would agree a better passing game could easily have saved Les's arse.
Only because the assumption is that that better passing game would lead to more wins.
If Les had the Number 1 passing offense in 2016, but still started 2-2, he is still no longer here.
This post was edited on 2/21/19 at 2:26 pm
Posted on 2/21/19 at 2:26 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Well, anyone who understands football would agree a better passing game could easily have saved Les's arse.
Anyone who understands football would agree that an extra play for LSU from the 5 yard line could easily have resulted in a win over Auburn.
Hence my laughter at you acting like your "if" scenario is somehow more relevant than the other "if" scenario presented.
This post was edited on 2/21/19 at 2:27 pm
Posted on 2/21/19 at 2:26 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Why were were losing these games?
I highlighted the important part for you...
The flip-side here would be, "How did the offense look in these games we won?" The answer still could have been, "Quite shitty" but without the loss, it would not have mattered much.
Posted on 2/21/19 at 2:27 pm to RogerTheShrubber
You think it’s a myth that LF7 wouldn’t have been a more effective player if he was healthy?
This is as dumb as you trying to claim 2016 Missouri is the same quality team as Wisconsin because SEC.
This is as dumb as you trying to claim 2016 Missouri is the same quality team as Wisconsin because SEC.
Posted on 2/21/19 at 2:28 pm to GeauxTigerTM
quote:
The flip-side here would be, "How did the offense look in these games we won?"
The ability to move the football
With three future NFL RB's, a simple competent passing game would have been awesome. Posted on 2/21/19 at 2:29 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Someone hurt your feelings..
I think the only feelings being generated by this act is embarrassment for you, champ.
Posted on 2/21/19 at 2:29 pm to SammyTiger
quote:
You think it’s a myth that LF7 wouldn’t have been a more effective player if he was healthy?
LF ran for over 130 in that game. We also had two future NFL RBs on the roster.
LF had over half of LSU's offense in the Wisconsin game. He did his part.
You know what failed? The passing game...
Posted on 2/21/19 at 2:30 pm to GeauxTigerTM
quote:
I think the only feelings being generated by this act is embarrassment for you, champ.
I'm not the one failing to connect a competent offense to winning a couple of games..
Posted on 2/21/19 at 2:32 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
I'm not the one failing to connect a competent offense to winning a couple of games..
No. You're the one who said wins and losses don't matter as much as offensive production.
Posted on 2/21/19 at 2:32 pm to RogerTheShrubber
not A fan of relativity
He ran well against both Auburn and Wisconsin, but he had below average games YPC and scores 0TDs
WITH a sprained ankle. You don’t think he’s better at 100%?
That’s an absurd position.
He ran well against both Auburn and Wisconsin, but he had below average games YPC and scores 0TDs
WITH a sprained ankle. You don’t think he’s better at 100%?
That’s an absurd position.
Posted on 2/21/19 at 2:33 pm to SammyTiger
quote:
That’s an absurd position.
Roger's comfort zone.
Posted on 2/21/19 at 2:33 pm to RB10
quote:
No. You're the one who said wins and losses don't matter as much as offensive production.
Link? I gotta see this.
Posted on 2/21/19 at 2:33 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
I'm not the one failing to connect a competent offense to winning a couple of games..
No one disputes the possibility. I don't think a competent offense equals a win, I think it equals a better chance to win, but a win over 2 top 10 teams is not certain
But if feels like you are disputing the following:
1) If Les starts 4-0 without a competent passing offense, he is still here
2) If Les starts 2-2, with a competent passing offense that he would still be here.
1 is true. 2 is not true. Therefore, passing doesn't really matter.
This post was edited on 2/21/19 at 2:37 pm
Posted on 2/21/19 at 2:33 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Link? I gotta see this.
It's already been linked Roger. Go back and find it.
Posted on 2/21/19 at 2:34 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
With three future NFL RB's, a simple competent passing game would have been awesome.
You're literally arguing with a mirror here. There is no one here arguing in defense of Miles' offense...you realize that, right?
We all agree, and we all wanted a better offense.
And yet...had he won those close games in 2016, that same shitty offense we'd grown weary off, would have been enough for a 4-0 start...and he'd have never been fired after Game 4.
Shitty offense was almost certainly WHY we lost games we ought not to have...but the losses were more important than the reason, and we know that because we'd had the reason in place for fricking years.
Posted on 2/21/19 at 2:34 pm to SammyTiger
quote:
He ran well against both Auburn and Wisconsin, but he had below average games YPC and scores 0TDs
Why didn't the coach put in one of the other future NFL backs?
LF accounted for over half our yards vs Wisconsin
Posted on 2/21/19 at 2:34 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Well, anyone who understands football would agree a better passing game could easily have saved Les's arse.
Could have or would have? I don't think anyone is debating whether or not it could have saved his job. Maybe that's the meds talking though.
Posted on 2/21/19 at 2:35 pm to Freauxzen
quote:
No one disputes that. But if feels like you are disputing the following:
1) If Les starts 4-0 without a competent passing offense, he is still here
2) If Les starts 2-2, with a competent passing offense that he would still be here.
1 is true. 2 is not true. Therefore, passing doesn't really matter.
Exactly. He's already said that if Miles had an offense that threw for a bunch of yards it wouldn't matter if LSU was losing 3 or 4 games. He'd still be the coach.
Posted on 2/21/19 at 2:35 pm to RB10
quote:
It's already been linked Roger.
Can't believe he just did that. Wow...
Page 122 of 166
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News