- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Attorney for players once bound for LSU plans legal action against SEC, Greg Sankey
Posted on 9/9/26 at 6:49 am
Posted on 9/9/26 at 6:49 am
LINK
quote:
Clayton told The Advocate on Tuesday night that he and the players’ legal team plan to pursue legal action against Sankey, the SEC and the NCAA — and not LSU — after they essentially forced the school to forgo rostering his clients, Dae’Quan Wright and Zxavaian Harris.
Clayton believes strongly that the conference has devalued his clients’ worth in NIL money.
“And what I mean by devalue (is)… they completely destroyed the character of these players, the credibility of these players,” Clayton said, “and the SEC has been a colossal failure to college sports by singling out these young athletes, and putting a scarlet letter around the neck of each and every one of them.”
Posted on 9/9/26 at 6:51 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
Take him for everything he’s got.
Posted on 9/9/26 at 6:52 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
Good
They’ll get a nice bit of hush money to not air out more dirty laundry on this POS conference
They’ll get a nice bit of hush money to not air out more dirty laundry on this POS conference
Posted on 9/9/26 at 6:53 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
and thats why LSU added Anding& Reliford to the roster
Posted on 9/9/26 at 6:53 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
Take his private jet
Posted on 9/9/26 at 6:54 am to AkronTiger
quote:
They’ll get a nice bit of hush money to not air out more dirty laundry on this POS conference
The only dirt they have would be on LSU/Kiffin.
The discovery in this suit could severely damage the program.
Posted on 9/9/26 at 6:55 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
quote:
Attorney for players once bound for LSU plans legal action against SEC, Greg Sankey
SEC schools that recruited these players after the 5/5 ruling is about to be blasted
Posted on 9/9/26 at 6:56 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
The only dirt they have would be on LSU/Kiffin.
You really believe that kiffin is the only one who talked to these players?
Posted on 9/9/26 at 6:57 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
The discovery in this suit could severely damage the program
Or the SEC
Posted on 9/9/26 at 6:57 am to SlowFlowPro
Bro you’re supposed to only ask questions too which you spray know the answer.
You have zero knowledge of who else talked to Wright or Harris.
You have zero knowledge of who else talked to Wright or Harris.
Posted on 9/9/26 at 6:58 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
quote:
Clayton told The Advocate on Tuesday night that he and the players’ legal team plan to pursue legal action against Sankey, the SEC and the NCAA — and not LSU — after they essentially forced the school to forgo rostering his clients, Dae’Quan Wright and Zxavaian Harris.
Clayton believes strongly that the conference has devalued his clients’ worth in NIL money.
“And what I mean by devalue (is)… they completely destroyed the character of these players, the credibility of these players,” Clayton said, “and the SEC has been a colossal failure to college sports by singling out these young athletes, and putting a scarlet letter around the neck of each and every one of them.”
Yes. And this can and should be portrayed as a civil rights
Posted on 9/9/26 at 6:59 am to Adam Banks
quote:
You really believe that kiffin is the only one who talked to these players?
The bigger issue will be any evidence that there was collusion to file the injunction. Since it was filed in LA state court, I doubt South Carolina was involved in that plan
This post was edited on 9/9/26 at 7:00 am
Posted on 9/9/26 at 6:59 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
The only dirt they have would be on LSU/Kiffin.
To support what legal theory? Even if Kiffin said "I think you should sue to assert your legal rights," how would that be relevant to any cause of action?
Posted on 9/9/26 at 7:00 am to Meauxjeaux
quote:
You have zero knowledge of who else talked to Wright or Harris.
Has nothing to do with my comment.
Posted on 9/9/26 at 7:00 am to Adam Banks
quote:
You really believe that kiffin is the only one who talked to these players?
It doesn't matter, unless Kiffin has evidence of other coaches contacting them as well, and even then "well they did it too!" isn't a legal defense.
He's the only one being targeted unfortunately.
Posted on 9/9/26 at 7:00 am to IvoryBillMatt
quote:
? Even if Kiffin said "I think you should sue to assert your legal rights," how would that be relevant to any cause of action?
It would be relevant to potential future SEC/NCAA punishment
Posted on 9/9/26 at 7:00 am to bstew3006
not as fun being an edgelord in that scenario.
Posted on 9/9/26 at 7:01 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
The bigger issue will be any evidence that there was collusion to file the injunction.
I would imagine the SEC wouldnt withold those cards if they had direct proof because if they really hated Kiffen that bad they'd just expel HIM from the league as fast as they could.
This post was edited on 9/9/26 at 7:02 am
Posted on 9/9/26 at 7:01 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
The bigger issue will be any evidence that there was collusion to file the injunction. Since it was filed in LA state court, I doubt South Carolina was involved in that plan
It was one of 60 pretty similar lawsuits from all over the country. Any attempt to isolate LSU or Louisiana falls apart under the slightest bit of scrutiny.
Posted on 9/9/26 at 7:01 am to Ebridg3
It’s restraint of trade pure and simple.
It’s going to ugly for the sec
It’s going to ugly for the sec
Popular
Back to top


12







