5 reasons CLEMSON will win...... Read Clemson fans comments

That shite made me cringe and the comments are something a 10 year old would write.

They have apparently legalized weed in South Carolina. You have to be high as a kite and searching for something to make the popcorn in to come up with this stuff!

I'm glad they're thinking like they are, actually. But it's no different than any other fanbase has done this year. The "staggering receiving yards" was hilarious.

You forgot the "Dabo is a rah rah coach and he will inspire them to victory"

Dylan Roof is a Clemson fan

What I dont understand is that they are trying to guesstimate LSU's potential against Clemson by extrapolating stats primarily from the Oklahoma game and overall season scoring results.

With that, the commentators commence to downplay Oklahoma's quality as an oppenent bc of how Baylor got handled by Georgia, even with 2nd stringers or whatnot... Thus, the assumption is Oklahoma was an overrated team, and thus, their inference is LSU is not the juggernaut they appear to be...

First, anyone who tries to determine the quality of an opponent through transitive property measures is setting themself up for failure in predicting an outcome of a future game, let alone between different matchups... So many variables, known (key injuries, suspensions, cohesion of a unit, time of season, weather, etc.) and unknown, are in play, to where you simply cannot rely on much data with certainty, especially with college kids. As far as "unknown," for instance, if Joe had broke up with his g.f. the day before a game against, say Auburn, one likely could assume that "affected" his play and "possibly" played a role in his performance and the score's "close" outcome.

Now, the above-mentioned hypothet cannot quantify to what degree JB's play was affected. Hence, with college kids, extraneous and unknown factors, which are likely to influence and determine's a college kid's ability to perform on a given day, moreso than a NFL player, cannot be accounted for. A NFL player is a professional and one should readily assume that he is a maturing adult, getting "handsomely paid," and understands it is his "career path", thus, extraneous influences are likely to be less of a factor than with 18-22 yr olds..

Secondly, Georgia beat Baylor soundly, LSU destroyed Oklahoma, coupled with the conference's bowl record, should be viewed that the top-mid tier of the SEC is strong, as far as comparisons in relation to the Big 12, Big Ten and to some degree the nation-at-large. LSU did what they were supposed to do to an "overrated" Oklahoma. Their argument suggests something otherwise...

However, and again, this is a sort of transitive comparison that has nothing to do with determining the outcome of the NC champ game, in relation to Clemson.

Even with the comparison as to the common opponent, Texas A&M, the few variables expounded upon above, WILL affect the outcomes of each game, respectively... And that is the ONLY game even worth attempting to conduct such an analysis, but doing so, is likely to be an exercise in futility as well.

Further, bc of Clemson and LSU's significant disparity in quality of opponents throughout the season, one cannot look at Clemson's stats, particularly, scoring defense (pro-Clemson pundits love to use this as the calling card in their argument) and attempt to determine an outcome. Clemson played nobody until OSU... LSU played 5 teams worthy of OSU-like consideration in trying to determine their quality. So, LSU has more games to determine their "mean" more than Clemson... Clemson needed to play OSU to even project how they would fare against a Top 10 opponent.

Also, the suggestion that "LSU is not a great RUN team" fails upon mention. LSU is an elite "passing" team and their strength. However, the fact that CEH still ran for nearly 1,300 yards with 2 1000+ yds. receivers, tells me that CEH is elite (run game) himself and undoubtedly could contribute more if needed. Dobbins ran on them wild until he got hurt and thats with knowing that Fields is not the passer that JB is and WAS HURT.. Clemson (Venables) will not stack the box on LSU bc they KNOW Joe will make them pay for it if they guess wrong! Clyde will have consistent success running the ball and would not be suprised if CEH breaks off the same runs like Dobbins and/or finishes the game with more yards than Dobbins had. They will not be able to stop both. Choose your poison!!

At least they realize that the D is better than suspected and/or the stats bear out. The jump ball/high-point aspect with LSU secondary against Higgins/Ross is a valid argument, and will happen a few plays but they are not Jamarr Chase caliber in that regards, and I stand by that.

Now, with that all that bad analysis, they come back to their damn senses in the end and realize that LSU will beat Clemson and a blowout is more likely to occurr in favor of LSU than otherwise.
So, the video is pointless. Their breakdown doesnt fit their final analysis. Waste of time... Along with my analysis of their analysis... lol. Geaux Tigers. 49-24. Book it.

Number one reason is obviously that jesus has ordained it