- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: 3rd party witness confirms Jefferson and Johns involvment...
Posted on 8/25/11 at 1:00 pm to TigerKnights
Posted on 8/25/11 at 1:00 pm to TigerKnights
quote:
I find it a little hard to believe a false witness planted by Lowery would turn around and redact her statements.
I'm beginning to think you have no idea what this word means.
2
Posted on 8/25/11 at 1:01 pm to Louie T
quote:
This thread is way past pathetic.
:kige:
Posted on 8/25/11 at 1:01 pm to T Ba Doe Tiger
quote:
Posted by T Ba Doe Tiger
So involvement proven. Any word on instigation and whether this was a case of defending one's self?
yes, they were concerned that smaller men, even though outnumbered would harm them while laying on the ground in agony. they had no choice but to start kicking them.
Posted on 8/25/11 at 1:01 pm to The Truth 34
LOL
Posted on 8/25/11 at 1:01 pm to chipd
quote:
The police said W/M, she actually uses the names and they were edited from the report.
You need some reading comprehension skills. It says specifically in the report "unknown W/M". Then it goes on to list Lowery and another females accounts of the incident. I guess that story about Lowery getting kicked out of the bar sounds a little far-fetched when you find out the officer took his statement IN THE BAR.
Posted on 8/25/11 at 1:01 pm to msutiger
quote:
Police received a call about the incident just after 1:30 a.m., the report says. When they arrived at Shady’s no one involved in the fight was present. A witness told the officer that people involved might have gone to Reggie’s Bar at 1176 Bob Petit Drive, the report says. The officer went to Reggie’s but did not find anyone involved in the altercation, the report says. When the officer returned to Shady’s, Lowrey was present and gave the officer his account of what occurred.
What is this all about?
quote:
Lowrey and three men, none of whom are LSU football players, were treated at a hospital for minor injuries, police have said. The other men’s names have not been released.
This was in there also.
quote:
The man who was knocked unconscious and suffered contusions to his head, nose and hands is a Marine, police said.
So the guy that JJ kicked, or was reported kicking is not the guy with the vertebrae. how can any one make a conclusion out of this report.
This post was edited on 8/25/11 at 1:08 pm
Posted on 8/25/11 at 1:04 pm to IAmTheHatOnMilesHead
There's a whole lot of stupid going on here.
And just for the record, my brother was robbed of thousands of dollars in cash and guns from his apartment. The perp cut himself during the robbery, the cop couldnt even swap the blood evidence.
So if you think CSI is on the case here, think again. Thats TV.
Sorry if I dont have a lot of confidence in cops these day who seem hell bent on traffic tickets and not on actually solving crimes.
If the resources are being used to solve this case end up useless, there will be some splaining to do Lucy.
And just for the record, my brother was robbed of thousands of dollars in cash and guns from his apartment. The perp cut himself during the robbery, the cop couldnt even swap the blood evidence.
So if you think CSI is on the case here, think again. Thats TV.
Sorry if I dont have a lot of confidence in cops these day who seem hell bent on traffic tickets and not on actually solving crimes.
If the resources are being used to solve this case end up useless, there will be some splaining to do Lucy.
Posted on 8/25/11 at 1:04 pm to ProjectP2294
quote:
I'm beginning to think you have no idea what this word means.
How many of you don't know what it means? You seem to want me to define it for you. Have you even watched an episode of The Office? Please enlighten me with YOUR definition. 
Posted on 8/25/11 at 1:05 pm to TigerKnights
Where did it say the responding le took statements inside the bar?
Posted on 8/25/11 at 1:05 pm to TheWhizzinator
Good while that article does nothing but continue to provide one side of things - it does make this thing simple to finish.
Marine's statement to police is that he just pulled an dude unknown to him away from fight and got attacked.
Marine's attorney already stated to media that the four dudes knew eachother, were never in bar they were just there to pick up someone.
Fisher has said he has a video of Marine in bar before brawl and his actions in video supported players account.
Why is this thing not already settled - all of the above can't be true and are easily verified by police. No DNA, shoes, etc. necessary.
Marine's statement to police is that he just pulled an dude unknown to him away from fight and got attacked.
Marine's attorney already stated to media that the four dudes knew eachother, were never in bar they were just there to pick up someone.
Fisher has said he has a video of Marine in bar before brawl and his actions in video supported players account.
Why is this thing not already settled - all of the above can't be true and are easily verified by police. No DNA, shoes, etc. necessary.
Posted on 8/25/11 at 1:07 pm to rosiebean
quote:
here did it say the responding le took statements inside the bar?
It doesn't. Says the officer returned "to Shady's" and the above poster infers that means that a statement was taken within the bar.
Doesn't make sense considering the fight occurred in the parking lot. Why would Shady's or anyone else let this kid back in the bar after a fight? Every bar and bouncer I know wants it out of the bar as quickly as possible.
Posted on 8/25/11 at 1:07 pm to Tigerstark
quote:
Marine's attorney already stated to media that the four dudes knew eachother,
doesn't matter what he says to the media...legally, it just doesn't. Sorry.
Posted on 8/25/11 at 1:08 pm to Tigerstark
Hope it works out
Posted on 8/25/11 at 1:09 pm to Tiger Ryno
quote:1. Edit (text) for publication.
do you know what REDACT means?
2. Censor or obscure (part of a text) for legal or security purposes
Posted on 8/25/11 at 1:09 pm to rosiebean
quote:
Where did it say the responding le took statements inside the bar?
"Upon my arrival at the bar, I came in contact with Andrew Lowery. Lowery advises that he was assaulted by the large crowd of people. Lowery advises that while standing outside in the parking lot of the bar, he observed several suspects..."
Sounds to me like he was inside the bar, but I suppose you can say it doesn't explicitly say "I took Lowery's statement inside of the bar."
Posted on 8/25/11 at 1:10 pm to Tigerstark
quote:
If the resources are being used to solve this case end up useless, there will be some splaining to do Lucy.
Says who? You?
The vast majority of people disagree with you, regardless of what a select few on this board continue to rally behind.
Posted on 8/25/11 at 1:11 pm to TigerKnights
quote:
rotflmao: How many of you don't know what it means? You seem to want me to define it for you. Have you even watched an episode of The Office? Please enlighten me with YOUR definition.
Are you really this stupid?
Posted on 8/25/11 at 1:11 pm to TigerKnights
quote:
Sounds to me like he was inside the bar, but I suppose you can say it doesn't explicitly say "I took Lowery's statement inside of the bar."
It doesn't say anything about being inside the bar, and yet, you still make that inference. Then, you use that inference to draw a conclusion that previous statements about the kid being inside are completely baseless.
quote:
I guess that story about Lowery getting kicked out of the bar sounds a little far-fetched when you find out the officer took his statement IN THE BAR.
Posted on 8/25/11 at 1:11 pm to CptBengal
I still would like to know why we're only hearing one side of the story. Doesn't seem like very fair reporting.
Posted on 8/25/11 at 1:12 pm to TigerKnights
quote:
You need some reading comprehension skills
dude, get it right yourself before you tell other people to get comprehension skills. where the female witness talks about the driver of the truck the report refers to the "unknown w/m." then the report identifies the person who rescued the driver and was subsequently attacked by name, but his name is "redacted" (which by the way means "edit" but is usually used to refer to specific information is removed from or blacked-out in a written document. it clearly does not mean whatever you think it means from your extensive viewing of "the office") from the report. it would certainly appear from the report that she knew this supposed rescuer.
Page 12 of 21
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News