Started By
Message

US doctors' group adopts new policy on healthy weight assessment

Posted on 7/5/23 at 9:32 am
Posted by LSUAlum2001
Stavro Mueller Beta
Member since Aug 2003
48591 posts
Posted on 7/5/23 at 9:32 am
Gym goers rejoice!

quote:

June 14 (Reuters) - The American Medical Association (AMA) on Wednesday said it will advise doctors to pay less attention to body mass index (BMI) in determining if a patient is at a healthy weight, saying the measure does not predict disease risk equally well across racial and ethnic groups.

BMI, a ratio of weight to height, has long been used to define underweight, "normal" weight, overweight, obesity and morbid obesity, despite mounting evidence that it is an inaccurate predictor of health risks on an individual level.

At the influential physician group's annual meeting in Chicago, members voted adopt a new policy that says BMI should be just one factor in determining whether a patient is at a healthy weight. Other measures such as body composition, belly fat, waist circumference, and genetic factors are also important, the AMA said.


LINK

I like how they make it a Racial/Ethnic decision and not the most obvious one: People who lift and stay in shape vs. people who do not and are fat AF.
Posted by OysterPoBoy
City of St. George
Member since Jul 2013
44946 posts
Posted on 7/5/23 at 9:40 am to
quote:

the measure does not predict disease risk equally well across racial and ethnic groups.


You know somewhere there's a 300 lb black woman telling a 300 lb Polynesian woman, "Girl, I told you."
Posted by LSUAlum2001
Stavro Mueller Beta
Member since Aug 2003
48591 posts
Posted on 7/5/23 at 9:47 am to
I reposted this in the OT because those frickers love a good BMI discussion. My current BMI ranges from 28-30 with an actual BF% of 16 or so. If I ever decided to get serious on diet.. nah... frick that.. I like to eat.



We can have the civil discussion of the flaws of BMI here.
This post was edited on 7/5/23 at 9:56 am
Posted by Hu_Flung_Pu
Central, LA
Member since Jan 2013
22543 posts
Posted on 7/5/23 at 10:55 am to
BMI not good for advanced lifters

BMI good for general population

that's really all there is to it
Posted by Canuck Tiger
Member since Sep 2010
1808 posts
Posted on 7/5/23 at 12:06 pm to
One thing in defence of BMI I will say is people WAY overblow how much off it will be if you lift. People act like because they work out they can be carrying around 30-40lbs extra weight and it's all beef, which unless they're juicing just isn't the case.
Posted by lsu777
Lake Charles
Member since Jan 2004
38079 posts
Posted on 7/5/23 at 12:23 pm to
its really only flawed for about 5% of the population at most. i personally would rather see them use body fat percentage but good luck getting females to allow that into their file

and got to love the OT....."BMI is dumb AF, its flawed and doesnt work for people like me" same guy 5 post later..."look i wear a size 38 in the waist...im not fat" :rotflmao: :rotflmao: :rotflmao:
Posted by BluegrassBelle
RIP Hefty Lefty - 1981-2019
Member since Nov 2010
108047 posts
Posted on 7/5/23 at 12:58 pm to
quote:

Other measures such as body composition, belly fat, waist circumference, and genetic factors are also important, the AMA said.


Waist circumference and belly fat are the big things they need to be looking at anyway. Lots of correlations between belly fat and health issues.
Posted by Canuck Tiger
Member since Sep 2010
1808 posts
Posted on 7/5/23 at 1:25 pm to
Waist to height ratio is easy enough to measure and gives a pretty good idea of whether you're at a healthy weight or not. People lie about their height as much or more as their weight though... so maybe not.
Posted by NewOrleansBlend
Member since Mar 2008
1208 posts
Posted on 7/5/23 at 1:59 pm to
quote:

Lots of correlations between belly fat and health issues.


Visceral fat and belly fat are very different
Posted by caro81
Member since Jul 2017
6358 posts
Posted on 7/5/23 at 2:01 pm to
quote:

and got to love the OT....."BMI is dumb AF, its flawed and doesnt work for people like me" same guy 5 post later..."look i wear a size 38 in the waist...im not fat"



i did get a chuckle out of it. "but its not the right weight for him"

I do not particularly love the BMI myself and think other ways like just straight BF% measures should be the standard. That being said if you are deep in the high BMI numbers, you gotta accept facts.
This post was edited on 7/5/23 at 2:05 pm
Posted by BigPerm30
Member since Aug 2011
32065 posts
Posted on 7/5/23 at 2:52 pm to
My BMI is 22 and BF% in 11-12. FAT according to our us doctors
Posted by LSUAlum2001
Stavro Mueller Beta
Member since Aug 2003
48591 posts
Posted on 7/5/23 at 2:56 pm to
..and the waist measurement should be performed at the belly button, not where you wear your shorts/pants. Those two numbers could be vastly different.

An example:



Dudes be claiming they wear a 32" waisted pants but have 8" of gut hanging over the front.

If they really want a simple calculation method without putting someone through a BF% caliper measurement, the US Navy method fits in perfectly.

Height
Weight
Neck circumference
Waist circumference at the belly button

US Navy Calc

This post was edited on 7/5/23 at 3:01 pm
Posted by Mo Jeaux
Member since Aug 2008
63801 posts
Posted on 7/5/23 at 3:08 pm to
I always get really weird readings from the Navy method.
Posted by LSUAlum2001
Stavro Mueller Beta
Member since Aug 2003
48591 posts
Posted on 7/5/23 at 3:10 pm to
quote:

I always get really weird readings from the Navy method.


Mine has me at 16% which is much closer than what a 29-30 BMI suggests.
Posted by BigPerm30
Member since Aug 2011
32065 posts
Posted on 7/5/23 at 3:29 pm to
quote:

I always get really weird readings from the Navy method.


You probably have the same issue as me. It doesn’t account for my 6lbs of dick.
Posted by h0bnail
Member since Sep 2009
7628 posts
Posted on 7/5/23 at 3:36 pm to
quote:

You probably have the same issue as me. It doesn’t account for my 6lbs of dick.



Same issue with my dump truck arse.
Posted by caro81
Member since Jul 2017
6358 posts
Posted on 7/5/23 at 3:45 pm to
never used the navy one. puts me at 14-16, which sounds about right.
Posted by h0bnail
Member since Sep 2009
7628 posts
Posted on 7/5/23 at 6:17 pm to
27.4 BMI

Navy method has me at 20% body fat vs 17.5 on a recent InBody test.
Posted by LSUAlum2001
Stavro Mueller Beta
Member since Aug 2003
48591 posts
Posted on 7/5/23 at 6:42 pm to
My last InBody was 17%.

I once did a caliper BF test (same weight as now) and the girl doing the test had me at 9%.
Posted by Earnest_P
Member since Aug 2021
5488 posts
Posted on 7/5/23 at 7:15 pm to
25.9 BMI
Navy Calc 16%
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram