- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Stubborn belly fat
Posted on 9/10/18 at 11:28 pm to omegaman66
Posted on 9/10/18 at 11:28 pm to omegaman66
Fat loss is 100% aath equation. Insulin levels have nothing to go with it above like 12% bf. Plenty of studies prove that. Still should keep carbs around 100 per day and protein greater than 50% of calories for diet induced thermogenesis and for health purposes. But has no effect on fatloss.
IF, is just a tool to control calories, although it does help blood flow to stubborn areas promoting fat loss from areas that are usually the last to go according to the two newest studies. I do 16:8 at a minimum daily, usually longer.
IF, is just a tool to control calories, although it does help blood flow to stubborn areas promoting fat loss from areas that are usually the last to go according to the two newest studies. I do 16:8 at a minimum daily, usually longer.
Posted on 9/11/18 at 12:20 am to lsu777
I disagree. Dr. Eric Berg has a ton of video's on youtube that are excellent. He disagrees as well that it is a simple 1+1=2 formula. Again it isn't insulin, but cells resistance to insulin that you body makes, that prevents your body from burning the fat that someone with less IR would burn eating the same diet.
Posted on 9/11/18 at 3:10 am to omegaman66
At the risk of sounding arrogant, there is nothing to disagree with, I want posting an opinion, I was posting a fact.Idon't care if some YouTube doctor disagrees, he is wrong to. Dozens of studies prove this. A simple Google search will provide them. There is zero advantage from a body composition stand point to bring on a keto diet. Science proves this. And I promise you can't find one single study from the last 30 years that backs your claim up, zero, none, zilch.
Now that doesn't take into complaince which keto tends to be really good at keeping people complaint.
All keto, like intermittent fasting, trends to help regulate blood flow into cells that routinely don't get enough blood flow. This does tend to help those on keto burn fat from stubborn areas like the stomach.
I say all this as somebody who uses strict keto to cut for personal preference. I'm not coming from a place of keto hate, quite the opposite. Still doesn't mean you burn fat faster than a traditional diet and science has been trying hard to prove it, but can't.
Now that doesn't take into complaince which keto tends to be really good at keeping people complaint.
All keto, like intermittent fasting, trends to help regulate blood flow into cells that routinely don't get enough blood flow. This does tend to help those on keto burn fat from stubborn areas like the stomach.
I say all this as somebody who uses strict keto to cut for personal preference. I'm not coming from a place of keto hate, quite the opposite. Still doesn't mean you burn fat faster than a traditional diet and science has been trying hard to prove it, but can't.
Posted on 9/18/18 at 10:04 am to lsu777
Just an update:
Weight continues to come off, slow and steady. I am preparing for my first cheat day in a couple of weeks. Down to 182 at 16.4% BF.
Chest: 44in
Arms: 18in
Quads: 22in
Neck: 16 1/2in
I wear a 33in pants. I still have stubborn fat around the midsection but it has significantly reduced and upper abs are starting to peak through.
I can’t thank everyone in this thread enough. I knew the answers but had to hear them and the no shite advice in this thread has helped me greatly.
Weight continues to come off, slow and steady. I am preparing for my first cheat day in a couple of weeks. Down to 182 at 16.4% BF.
Chest: 44in
Arms: 18in
Quads: 22in
Neck: 16 1/2in
I wear a 33in pants. I still have stubborn fat around the midsection but it has significantly reduced and upper abs are starting to peak through.
I can’t thank everyone in this thread enough. I knew the answers but had to hear them and the no shite advice in this thread has helped me greatly.
Posted on 9/18/18 at 10:27 am to touchdownjeebus
quote:
Just an update:
Weight continues to come off, slow and steady. I am preparing for my first cheat day in a couple of weeks. Down to 182 at 16.4% BF.
Chest: 44in
Arms: 18in
Quads: 22in
Neck: 16 1/2in
I wear a 33in pants. I still have stubborn fat around the midsection but it has significantly reduced and upper abs are starting to peak through.
I can’t thank everyone in this thread enough. I knew the answers but had to hear them and the no shite advice in this thread has helped me greatly.
good to see. your arms are huge for your size
Posted on 9/18/18 at 10:55 am to lsu777
You had me at huge, xoxo.
Working hard, brother.
Working hard, brother.
Posted on 9/18/18 at 2:03 pm to omegaman66
quote:
Fat loss is 100% aath equation. Insulin levels have nothing to go with it above like 12% bf. Plenty of studies prove that. Still should keep carbs around 100 per day and protein greater than 50% of calories for diet induced thermogenesis and for health purposes. But has no effect on fatloss.
quote:
I disagree. Dr. Eric Berg has a ton of video's on youtube that are excellent. He disagrees as well that it is a simple 1+1=2 formula
I'm going to split the difference and say that you're both can be right?
Within the diabetic world, they are now looking at research for cellular responses to varying levels of insulin concentration in the body. With Type 1 and insulin controlled type 2 diabetics, insulin is associated with a weight gain that can't be explained simply by corrective actions of hypoglycemia (blood sugar crashing and needing a quick dose of sweets to fix it). Whereas metformin has been known to help with weight loss for non-insulin dependent type 2 diabetics. One of the roles of metformin is to reduce insulin resistance.
The mechanisms all revolve around hunger, so 777's point regarding fat loss is absolutely 100% correct. However, what is certainly being proposed within scientific communities is that a viable mechanism may be that increases in insulin resistance may lead to patients being "hungrier" than they should at a thermodynamically neutral condition. This in turn would drive overconsumption food.
But, it's a bit of a chicken or egg issue. Is a poor relationship with food the first domino to fall? Or is insulin resistance the first domino to fall? There's evidence pointing to both. Unfortunately, this all usually involves rats who sometimes decent metabolic proxies, but it's hard to compare decision making skills of rats to humans to get what we need for the whole story.
It's also possible that an early poor relationship with food leads to a cycle: Increased food intake leading to increased insulin resistance, leading to more "inaccurate" hunger signals, leading to more food intake, even when the now overweight patient is trying to correct for past behaviors ....
But my usual overall caveat - you can't actually study humans in depth over the course of their natural lives, so we'll probably never actually know the whole story.
Posted on 9/18/18 at 3:44 pm to BRIllini07
From reading your food intake you have a good bit of room for improvement on your selections. Maybe a little research on that. 1600 calories is pretty darn low.
But my question is your BF numbers sound like your using your body weight/ height to get that number. Just cause you hit 170 or whatever doesn't make you 9% BF
I've always been in favor of high protein low carb diets. Its just what works for me. I've been doing it for 24 years now. Sometimes it just takes trial and error to see what works for you.
But my question is your BF numbers sound like your using your body weight/ height to get that number. Just cause you hit 170 or whatever doesn't make you 9% BF
I've always been in favor of high protein low carb diets. Its just what works for me. I've been doing it for 24 years now. Sometimes it just takes trial and error to see what works for you.
Posted on 9/18/18 at 4:17 pm to bayouvette
Measurements, calipers, and BF scale. I’m estimating based on previous weight/BF. I’m really wide. The typical 5’6 guy and me look nothing alike. I have a 44 inch chest...
Posted on 9/19/18 at 3:10 pm to touchdownjeebus
i know we all store fat differently, but for me, the legit, real answer was carbs.
anything that breaks down as a starch or sugar was stored as visceral fat.
when i changed the types of carbs i consumed, my stomach got shredded without intense or frequent workouts.
anything that breaks down as a starch or sugar was stored as visceral fat.
when i changed the types of carbs i consumed, my stomach got shredded without intense or frequent workouts.
This post was edited on 9/19/18 at 4:35 pm
Posted on 9/19/18 at 8:33 pm to touchdownjeebus
FILO: First in, last out.
Mid-section BF is the slowest/last to go. You will lean out everywhere else, first.
Try some fasted cardio right when you wake up. Nothing to strenuous, just HR in the 65-70% zone for 30-45 min.
Also, drink a good casein protein shake before bed to keep your metabolism going while you snooze.
Mid-section BF is the slowest/last to go. You will lean out everywhere else, first.
Try some fasted cardio right when you wake up. Nothing to strenuous, just HR in the 65-70% zone for 30-45 min.
Also, drink a good casein protein shake before bed to keep your metabolism going while you snooze.
This post was edited on 9/19/18 at 8:34 pm
Posted on 9/20/18 at 12:14 am to LSUAlum2001
quote:
Also, drink a good casein protein shake before bed to keep your metabolism going while you snooze.
So having a protien shake before bed would help burn fat? I’m sure it would depend on the intake of calories during the day.
Shift work has my sleep schedule all messed up. Some days I don’t get to eat til early evening, sometimes I’ll eat at 11 at night. You think even if I drink a shake at 6 AM when I knock off of nights it would have the same effect?
Posted on 9/20/18 at 10:21 am to touchdownjeebus
(no message)
This post was edited on 6/12/19 at 11:35 am
Posted on 9/20/18 at 10:23 am to Big_country346
A good casein is sub 200 cals.
Of course, you want to monitor your caloric intake throughout the day, too.
Yes.
Of course, you want to monitor your caloric intake throughout the day, too.
quote:
You think even if I drink a shake at 6 AM when I knock off of nights it would have the same effect?
Yes.
This post was edited on 9/20/18 at 10:24 am
Posted on 9/20/18 at 11:05 am to oleyeller
quote:
You need to do something if that is 1.5-2g of your bodyweight fatasd
Posted on 9/20/18 at 1:20 pm to LSUAlum2001
quote:
LSUAlum2001
Does weight have to do with caloric intake or is it body type? Honestly when I eat low calories intentionally, over the span of a few days, I feel like straight shite. I don’t know if I’m doing it right.
This post was edited on 9/20/18 at 1:20 pm
Posted on 9/20/18 at 2:29 pm to Big_country346
quote:
Does weight have to do with caloric intake or is it body type? Honestly when I eat low calories intentionally, over the span of a few days, I feel like straight shite. I don’t know if I’m doing it right.
Definitely. A low calorie intake, especially if your job has you active will make you feel like arse. If you’re trying to workout, as well, it’ll be even more rough.
Get your BMR calculated. It won’t be exact, but a good starting point.
Based your caloric intake/macros around that.
Adjust as needed,
Posted on 9/20/18 at 2:56 pm to Big_country346
quote:
Does weight have to do with caloric intake or is it body type? Honestly when I eat low calories intentionally, over the span of a few days, I feel like straight shite. I don’t know if I’m doing it right.
How low are we talking? About 500cal/day low (so 1 lb/week weight loss-ish) should be pretty sustainable. 1000cal/day+ low you'll probably have no choice but to feel some drainage.
One thing to keep in mind is that you body tells you that you're hungry when your stomach goes empty, not when you have a caloric need for more food. A few tricks here are ditching fast acting carbs for fats and increasing fiber intake.
Posted on 9/22/18 at 10:30 am to touchdownjeebus
Tomorrow makes 6 weeks on low carb
Not keto, I eat too much protein
Down from 182 to 170
Most of that was belly and spare tire type fat that is now gone.
Not keto, I eat too much protein
Down from 182 to 170
Most of that was belly and spare tire type fat that is now gone.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News