Started By
Message

re: Just had my annual physical

Posted on 12/16/20 at 1:56 pm to
Posted by Salmon
I helped draft the email
Member since Feb 2008
86177 posts
Posted on 12/16/20 at 1:56 pm to
quote:

Also the tier 3 side effect rate for this vaccine is like 68 out of 1,000 compared to the 9 out of 1,000 it is supposed to help. It is a bad vaccine.


this is false

Moderna sever side effects

quote:

The frequency of serious adverse events was low (1.0% in the mRNA-1273 arm and 1.0% in the
placebo arm), without meaningful imbalances between study arms. The most common SAEs in
the vaccine group which were numerically higher than the placebo group were myocardial
infarction (0.03%), cholecystitis (0.02%), and nephrolithiasis (0.02%), although the small
numbers of cases of these events do not suggest a causal relationship. The most common
SAEs in the placebo arm which were numerically higher than the vaccine arm, aside from
COVID-19 (0.1%), were pneumonia (0.05%) and pulmonary embolism (0.03%).


Phizer

quote:

The frequency of serious adverse events
was low (<0.5%), without meaningful imbalances between study arms


quote:

And as you mentioned they've studied the mrna vaccines for a long time and the reason they weren't used before is because they were ridiculously dangerous.


This is 100% false. In fact, mRNA vaccines don't have a lot of the problems that DNA vaccines have.
Posted by zatetic
Member since Nov 2015
5677 posts
Posted on 12/16/20 at 3:24 pm to
Well I see it says 9% for pfizer compared to 2% for control group.

But no matter how we interpret the data, we can agree on one thing. The average life expectancy in America is 78.7 according to CDC and the average age of death due to COVID is 80. So if you die from Covid you will have lived longer than average person.
Posted by GreenRockTiger
vortex to the whirlpool of despair
Member since Jun 2020
60598 posts
Posted on 12/16/20 at 5:02 pm to
quote:

Also to reiterate, the COVID vaccine was not rushed through development. It was developed faster due to allocation of resources and funding.


I hate how you keep saying this - if you throw money at a pharmaceutical company - they will hurry up and come up with something - just bc the vaccine had more money, doesn’t mean it wasn’t rushed

quote:

quite extensively researched for several decades.


Since the 1990s - and the research on mRNA wasn’t really picked up until 2005
Posted by TigerFanatic99
South Bend, Indiana
Member since Jan 2007
35922 posts
Posted on 12/16/20 at 6:08 pm to
There is nothing constructive that is going to come out of this thread.

There is literally nothing we can say or show Salmon to get him to accept that it perfectly reasonable for people to be suspect of the vaccine and want to wait a year or two. We are all brainwashed idiots.

There is literally nothing that Salmon can show us that will give us the same blind trust that he has. We're all just brainwashed idiots.
Posted by GreenRockTiger
vortex to the whirlpool of despair
Member since Jun 2020
60598 posts
Posted on 12/16/20 at 6:55 pm to
quote:

There is literally nothing we can say or show Salmon


You are so correct

I’ll continue to be a brainwashed idiot and keep my mouth shut
Posted by Dixie Normus
Earth
Member since Sep 2013
2871 posts
Posted on 12/16/20 at 7:10 pm to
You linked a timeline of events on Operation Warp Speed. Here is a similar timeline, from the FDA itself, on how it “handled” the opioid crisis: LINK. Everyone saw how that worked out. Here’s a CBS story on how the FDA caved to Purdue pressure to greenlight advertising Oxy as a long term care treatment while knowing the science did not support long term care. LINK

I don’t think it’s unreasonable for people have a healthy amount of skepticism about the situation considering what we saw from big pharma and the FDA on opioids very recently. With the vaccine, we’re talking about the same exact players with even more incentive to cut corners. It’s just not realistic (or reasonable) to expect people to fully trust them given what we just saw transpire.

If you watch someone steal money from your neighbor, will you give them a loan when they ask you for one in a couple years? Probably not.

Why is this situation with the vaccine any different regarding trust?
This post was edited on 12/16/20 at 7:14 pm
Posted by Aubie Spr96
lolwut?
Member since Dec 2009
44416 posts
Posted on 12/16/20 at 7:37 pm to
Every drug ever recalled in the United States in the last 40 yrs was first approved by the FDA.
Posted by Salmon
I helped draft the email
Member since Feb 2008
86177 posts
Posted on 12/16/20 at 8:56 pm to
That is some sweet projection there. I never called y’all “brainwashed idiots”

I just think y’all are focusing outliers and misinformation to form your opinions.

Y’all can link all kinds of failed FDA approvals and then I could link 100x more successful approvals. I’ve never claimed pharma companies or the government are infallible. That’s nonsense.

Don’t take the vaccine. That’s your choice. Just don’t pretend that you are being rational.
Posted by lsu777
Lake Charles
Member since Jan 2004
38031 posts
Posted on 12/16/20 at 9:28 pm to
quote:

Don’t take the vaccine. That’s your choice. Just don’t pretend


So a healthy individual under 50 who has a 99.997% chance of surviving covid and over a 98% chance of not having any serious issues from covid is irrational for wanting to take a cautious approach to a new vaccine?

You do realize that the chances of getting complications from the vaccine are greater than getting serious complications from covid in that demographic right?

Yea, totally irrational.

Do you understand how irrational and stupid you sound? I haven't seen anyone saying ill never take it, more of, I'm in the very very low risk group and gonna slow play the vaccine and see how people respond first.

How in the frick is that being irrational?

Its the exact opposite of that. Its weighing pros and cons and understanding that do to their demo in relation to the virus, they should be one of the last to take the vaccine.

Don't say a bunch of stupid shite, get called out on it, and then play yall are big irrational card.
This post was edited on 12/16/20 at 9:30 pm
Posted by jordan21210
Member since Apr 2009
14206 posts
Posted on 12/16/20 at 10:31 pm to
quote:

How in the frick is that being irrational?

My $0.02...it’s irrational because of this:
quote:

So a healthy individual under 50 who has a 99.997% chance of surviving covid and over a 98% chance of not having any serious issues from covid

plus...

you said earlier that you get the flu shot every year and have high risk people in your family.

If the logic for not getting the Covid vaccine is the 99% survival rate of Covid, then you also would not get the flu vaccine, but you do so that’s illogical.
Posted by GreenRockTiger
vortex to the whirlpool of despair
Member since Jun 2020
60598 posts
Posted on 12/16/20 at 11:16 pm to
quote:

Y’all can link all kinds of failed FDA approvals and then I could link 100x more successful approvals.


Yes but when someone in your family has been affected by one of these ‘fda approved’ craps - it makes you skeptical

Plus it says on the Pfizer website the Covid vaccine has not been FDA approved, only approved for emergency usage. I don’t care to read what the difference is.
Posted by jordan21210
Member since Apr 2009
14206 posts
Posted on 12/17/20 at 6:39 am to
quote:

Plus it says on the Pfizer website the Covid vaccine has not been FDA approved, only approved for emergency usage.

FDA approved for emergency use is still FDA approved. Also, FDA emergency use authorization is what allowed physicians to use the “cocktail” and Remdesivir to be successfully used for Covid in the short term. And the same authorization Trump and nearly everyone on TD wanted the FDA to use for hydroxychloroquine but it was determined ineffective.

quote:

I don’t care to read what the difference is.

Well that’s just willful ignorance then.
Posted by Hulkklogan
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Oct 2010
43482 posts
Posted on 12/17/20 at 7:12 am to
This whole thread

Posted by Salmon
I helped draft the email
Member since Feb 2008
86177 posts
Posted on 12/17/20 at 7:48 am to
quote:

You do realize that the chances of getting complications from the vaccine are greater than getting serious complications from covid in that demographic right?



Both are statistically irrelevant.

quote:

Yea, totally irrational.


Statistical outliers don't concern me.

quote:

I haven't seen anyone saying ill never take it, more of, I'm in the very very low risk group and gonna slow play the vaccine and see how people respond first.


Cool. And for the vast majority of people, by the time you or I get to take it, literally millions of people will have received the vaccine and we will have months to almost a year worth of data.

So if the data is still good, yes, it will be completely irrational to not take it.

quote:

Don't say a bunch of stupid shite, get called out on it, and then play yall are big irrational card.


I will always call basing opinions on statistical outliers to be irrational


Posted by lsu777
Lake Charles
Member since Jan 2004
38031 posts
Posted on 12/17/20 at 7:56 am to
quote:

My $0.02...it’s irrational because of this:
quote:
So a healthy individual under 50 who has a 99.997% chance of surviving covid and over a 98% chance of not having any serious issues from covid



You aren't making sense. You are saying its irrational to not be in a hurry to take a vaccine for a virus that you virtually have zero chance of having serious complications from? Knowing the virus constitutes a greater chance of complications like bells palsey? Talk about irrational.

quote:

plus...

you said earlier that you get the flu shot every year and have high risk people in your family.

If the logic for not getting the Covid vaccine is the 99% survival rate of Covid, then you also would not get the flu vaccine, but you do so that’s illogical.


I never said I wasn't getting it, I will. Not gonna rush to do so, but I will be getting it. I wasn't talking about me. Salmon said anyone who doesn't get it is irrational, I was just showing how he and you are full of shite and your thought process is warped.

Just like you statement above which said someone is irrational for not choosing the option that constitutes the greater risk. How fricking warped is that?

Posted by Salmon
I helped draft the email
Member since Feb 2008
86177 posts
Posted on 12/17/20 at 8:02 am to
quote:

Knowing the virus constitutes a greater chance of complications like bells palsey? Talk about irrational.


:sigh:

No. We don't know this. All of the cases of Bells Palsy fell within (or lower) than the normal incidence rate.

You seem to be basing a lot of your opinions on misinformation.

quote:

Salmon said anyone who doesn't get it is irrational


I said people that based their opinions on statistical outliers are being irrational, which is what everyone seems to be doing.
Posted by lsu777
Lake Charles
Member since Jan 2004
38031 posts
Posted on 12/17/20 at 8:02 am to
quote:

Cool. And for the vast majority of people, by the time you or I get to take it, literally millions of people will have received the vaccine and we will have months to almost a year worth of data.

So if the data is still good, yes, it will be completely irrational to not take it.



I haven't seen a single person say they wouldn't take it, they would like to do exactly like you said. How is that irrational?

quote:

Statistical outliers don't concern me.



If statistical outliers don't concern you then why have anyone under 60 take the vaccine in the first place? Any complications from the virus are just statistical outliers anyways.
Posted by Salmon
I helped draft the email
Member since Feb 2008
86177 posts
Posted on 12/17/20 at 8:07 am to
quote:

I haven't seen a single person say they wouldn't take it


Well you should go to the OT/PT

see this thread LINK

quote:

they would like to do exactly like you said. How is that irrational?


That isn't being irrational because that would be taking it as soon as its available to you.

quote:

If statistical outliers don't concern you then why have anyone under 60 take the vaccine in the first place? Any complications from the virus are just statistical outliers anyways.


Same reason why I take the flu shot
This post was edited on 12/17/20 at 8:11 am
Posted by lsu777
Lake Charles
Member since Jan 2004
38031 posts
Posted on 12/17/20 at 8:12 am to
quote:

No. We don't know this. All of the cases of Bells Palsy fell within (or lower) than the normal incidence rate.


No, no they didn't, thats why the fda issued a notice that it should be monitored. Link your claim?

quote:

You seem to be basing a lot of your opinions on misinformation.


No you seem to be basing your info on only what the drug companies are putting out.

Look I'm not anti vaccine, in fact I will take it when available, but its not irrational to want to wait.

Also its ok to look at issues. The fda just said to monitor for bells palsy. There was just someone who had a reaction to the vaccine and had to be hospitalized (i know its an outlier), yes the vaccine was somewhat rushed, yes it only has emergency approval and not full approval, yes politics played a huge part in all of this. Its ok to acknowledge those things and still want to take the vaccine.

You seem to be ignoring anything that doesn't fit your agenda and calling it misinformation.

Wanf to blame someone for this BS, blame the media. Lame fauci, blame the politicians.

People are annoyed as fuxk as they have had their life's ruined. We get a vaccine and yet you still have the media pushing the "you must still keep wearing a mask and social distancing"

Fauci just said yesterday, we must keep up the same measures and can not return to normal.

Biden has called for 100 days of mask.

With all fo that bullshite being spread can you blame people for saying, "well if we have to do all that still, wtf is the point of getting a vaccine?"

And I showed you yesterday tons of headli es that show the media has been pushing the whole "the vaccine and antibodies only give you 3-6 months immunity"

I have given you tons of rational reasons why people are not going to run out and take the vaccine. But you call it misinformation and statistical outliers when having a vaccine for a virus that has a mortality rate of less than .03% for those under 60, is the definition of having a vaccine for statistical outliers.
Posted by lsu777
Lake Charles
Member since Jan 2004
38031 posts
Posted on 12/17/20 at 8:16 am to
quote:

Well you should go to the OT/PT


I was talking in this thread. The OT and PT is full of fat loons.

quote:

Same reason why I take the flu shot

Alot of people don't take the flu shot. I only take the shite because my wife is a big believer in it. Half the time the shite doesn't work, but I don't get side effects so who cares.

This vaccine is a different type and doesn't have decades of a proven track record of not causing crazy side effects.

Its not irrational to want to wait a while.

Again blame the media and the politicians for the shite. And I say I will take it right away, but if we still going to behave to do all of this bullshite, then I may rethink that.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram