- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 7/10/19 at 10:03 am to Joshjrn
quote:
That's the issue. People (who aren't morons) aren't complaining about the fee; they are complaining that Waitr forbids the restaurants from passing the cost forward to the customer. If a restaurant has a dish on the menu for $20, they must charge $20 when purchased through Waitr, even though Waitr is taking a substantial percentage. There are theoreticals in which a restaurant would be forced to lose money on low markup dishes.
If Waitr simply allowed restaurants to bump their pricing on their Waitr menu, the overwhelming majority of the angst would go away.
I understand that. But, I would estimate only 25-50% of restaurants on there actually bump up their prices to offset costs. More already follow this guideline, than don't.
And if you read all of the "press" this has been getting, Meztizo's is the only one that has mentioned controlling menu prices. The other 19 that have been interviewed all talk about the fee structure. And Jim at Meztizo's saying profit on food is only 5% is ridiculous. Maybe profit of the entire restaurant is 5%, but if food cost + labor = 95% than he has bigger problems than Waitr. The kitchen workers will be getting paid whether or not he accepts Waitr orders. I hope his food costs are around 25% or less. Most Mexican food is not expensive to make. After Waitr takes it's fee, there should be 40-50% left to go towards those labor costs already being incurred or other overhead costs. Waitr sales should be looked at like lagniappe.
Posted on 7/10/19 at 10:06 am to rowbear1922
quote:
I've also seen a restaurant owner upset with the new terms that the pictures, which the owners had to pay for, are legally owned by Waitr and cannot be used by the restaurant anymore.
They've always stated the pictures were "free" as a part of the sign up. I wouldn't worry too much about this. Waitr is in like 300 cities now. No way they're going to have someone that monitors all social media for all restaurants in every city. People should just not get obnoxious with it.
Posted on 7/10/19 at 10:14 am to BrianFlanagan
quote:Glad you spelled this out for me. I've stopped using them for delivery as it's been a total shitshow the last three times I tried, but I'm fully done with them now.
The percentage is what is taken from the delivery service. Someone buys a $10 entree from a restaurant. The person pays Waitr for the entree. The next day, Waitr direct deposits $6 into the restaurants account, and they keep the 40% or $4. This is how the Waitr/Restaurant relationship works. All of the other fees just go to Waitr.
Now I'll just use the app as a menu and call the restaurants directly
Posted on 7/10/19 at 10:14 am to BrianFlanagan
quote:
They've always stated the pictures were "free" as a part of the sign up. I wouldn't worry too much about this. Waitr is in like 300 cities now. No way they're going to have someone that monitors all social media for all restaurants in every city. People should just not get obnoxious with it.
I think it just compounds on the rest. They are definitely more upset they cannot upcharge for Waitr and the increase in percentage over the pictures.
Posted on 7/10/19 at 10:17 am to dukee7
More like Waitr pockets 25-30% of the order being sent out.
Posted on 7/10/19 at 10:28 am to BrianFlanagan
quote:
I understand that. But, I would estimate only 25-50% of restaurants on there actually bump up their prices to offset costs. More already follow this guideline, than don't.
That's... a significant percentage...
Posted on 7/10/19 at 10:38 am to Joshjrn
I would say closer to 75% bump their prices. Waitr really has trouble enforcing this
Posted on 7/10/19 at 11:36 am to GynoSandberg
What a horrible business model that won’t last. It’s a fairly simple concept, it seems pretty simple it should be the restaurant makes the same or maybe a very low percentage cut and then the customer pays the cost of the app and delivery.
Posted on 7/11/19 at 6:36 am to BrianFlanagan
quote:
And if you read all of the "press" this has been getting, Meztizo's is the only one that has mentioned controlling menu prices. The other 19 that have been interviewed all talk about the fee structure.
The reason they are complaining about the fee structure is because they can’t modify pricing to account for the added expense incurred for each Waitr delivery order.
If they sell a dish for $20 in the restaurant, and have a 25% margin on the in-store version....that margin disappears for to-go orders. So what incentive do I have to sign up with Waitr (or any company)? In other words - whether to-go or not, it costs the same to make a hamburger. I may sell more of them if I have a delivery option - but if it’s not profitable to sell it then what’s the point?
As an aside - can’t restaurants control what they offer to-go? Maybe they could limit offerings to higher margin items.
Posted on 7/11/19 at 7:13 am to DrEdgeLSU
My biggest issue is they are trying to control what we charge. They have no right to tell us how to price our food.
Posted on 7/11/19 at 9:02 am to BigJake
quote:
My biggest issue is they are trying to control what we charge. They have no right to tell us how to price our food.
Bingo
Posted on 7/11/19 at 9:16 am to LSUlefty
(no message)
This post was edited on 7/11/19 at 3:22 pm
Posted on 7/11/19 at 9:27 am to BigJake
They really are clueless as to what they’re going
And they want to take a bigger cut while offering nonexistent customer service to their restaurants and glitchy software
And they want to take a bigger cut while offering nonexistent customer service to their restaurants and glitchy software
Posted on 7/11/19 at 9:30 am to GynoSandberg
Only thing I use Waitr for is to order food for pickup. I have not done that in awhile though. Not sure you can even still do it.
Posted on 7/11/19 at 9:32 am to MarkFromBuffalo
Ouch, that’s some markup.
I don’t get why a restaurant that’s not take-out-centric would agree to Waitr’s terms. Seems like carryout business is a PITA for many establishments.
I don’t get why a restaurant that’s not take-out-centric would agree to Waitr’s terms. Seems like carryout business is a PITA for many establishments.
Posted on 7/11/19 at 10:31 am to hungryone
Well the incremental sales from waitr are a real thing. So it made sense when they were taking 15% and you could raise your prices to offset their fee.
Everyone is going to lose under their new structure
Everyone is going to lose under their new structure
Posted on 7/11/19 at 10:33 am to t00f
quote:
Only thing I use Waitr for is to order food for pickup. I have not done that in awhile though. Not sure you can even still do it.
The carry out WAITR prices are more ($2-$4) than what restaurants post online. Just use an online menu and call your order in directly to the restaurant.
Posted on 7/11/19 at 10:53 am to Breauxsif
It is worth the extra money to be able to not wait in line to pay.
Posted on 7/11/19 at 11:01 am to MarkFromBuffalo
That's why I quit using them. If you look at what the cost is if you just call in the order and pick it up yourself vs. having them deliver it is in come cases double. Not to mention, they are very short on drivers so half the time, your food gets to you cold/soggy.
Popular
Back to top


0








