- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 11/20/20 at 12:49 pm to Swagga
quote:
My league is voting that if you’re gonna play him this week it has to be in the flex position. Not the right end.
You mean everyone is acting like children because they didn't get Hill off waivers first
Posted on 11/20/20 at 12:58 pm to Ed Osteen
Exactly
Posted on 11/20/20 at 1:22 pm to bamabenny
I do think he should have been listed as a RB over TE. He’s a lot closer to a wildcat QB who just rushes than he is a TE in any respect.
I know he lines up outside of the backfield, but so do several RBs. Not sure why providers felt TE was the most appropriate.
I know he lines up outside of the backfield, but so do several RBs. Not sure why providers felt TE was the most appropriate.
Posted on 11/20/20 at 2:10 pm to Ed Osteen
Yes it’s so childish to make him flex a guy who literally hasn’t played a snap at tight end all season, but for some reason is listed there.
No one is making him sit him. It’s just not gonna be at tight end because espn is stupid.
No one is making him sit him. It’s just not gonna be at tight end because espn is stupid.
Posted on 11/20/20 at 2:29 pm to LSUcam7
Crickets in my league. Most of us are in our mid to late 30’s with a lot on our plates though.
Posted on 11/20/20 at 3:02 pm to GynoSandberg
quote:they could at least not count his passing stats unless you have him at QB
As we've noted throughout the week, Taysom Hill will retain TE eligibility against Atlanta and we will re-evaluate for future weeks once Week 11 concludes.
Posted on 11/20/20 at 3:06 pm to ellishughtiger
quote:
crickets in my league
Same. We're all 30 plus with pretty busy schedules. My opponent is a district attorney though. Dude is prob gonna put me in jail for something once I get a 20 burger from the stormin mormon at TE.
Posted on 11/20/20 at 3:27 pm to jkylejohnson
I grabbed him up mainly just to keep him away from everyone else and supposedly my opponent through a fit about it. 
Posted on 11/20/20 at 4:05 pm to ellishughtiger
Taysom is better play than almost all TEs. If you have one of the couple that are a better play, then you likely don’t have him
Posted on 11/20/20 at 4:15 pm to Swagga
Posted on 11/20/20 at 4:34 pm to ellishughtiger
So I grabbed Hill on the off chance something like this happened but Waller is my TE. I’ve never considered putting a tight end at flex but I might in this situation. Is Waller worth a flex spot in a half ppr league? Next best options are kind of weak this week. I would have been playing JD Mckissic or Antonio Brown this week at flex.
Posted on 11/20/20 at 4:35 pm to beaverfever
quote:
Jameis Winston will not be part of any offensive packages Sunday vs. the Falcons, per @diannaESPN. The Saints’ QB now is Taysom Hill.
This post was edited on 11/20/20 at 4:37 pm
Posted on 11/20/20 at 5:25 pm to Swagga
quote:
Yes it’s so childish to make him flex a guy who literally hasn’t played a snap at tight end all season, but for some reason is listed there.
No one is making him sit him. It’s just not gonna be at tight end because espn is stupid.
Dude you’re on an island.
Posted on 11/20/20 at 6:03 pm to tilco
Easy to spot the butthurts in here that didn't get to the waivers in time and the even more butthurts whose opponents did.
Posted on 11/20/20 at 10:55 pm to LSUcam7
quote:
I do think he should have been listed as a RB over TE. He’s a lot closer to a wildcat QB who just rushes than he is a TE in any respect.
I get what you’re saying, but there’s an issue with this line of thinking.
Players like McKissic and Edmonds are RBs who have more receptions than rushes. Still RBs.
The big one.....Alvin Kamara. He’s more involved in the passing game than the rushing. No one would ever argue him being in a RB slot though.
Same with Hill. He’s a cheat code this week. Next week it won’t be an option because ESPN will likely change his designation. This is fantasy football in a nutshell. You’re looking to get a leg up where you can find it. Users who got hill found a loophole.
ETA: McKissic and Edmonds may not actually have more receptions than rushes. I didn’t look at the numbers.
This post was edited on 11/20/20 at 11:07 pm
Posted on 11/21/20 at 5:52 am to RB10
My commish scheduled a vote after people complained. But he also said that he wasn’t going to vote to cancel the move because in his view, and for this week only, the owner should get to take advantage of the fact that he was playing fantasy football on a Friday night while the rest of us were spending time with our friends and families.
Posted on 11/21/20 at 6:29 am to dirtsandwich
This wasnt a one day friday night shocker. Sure as a full time starter yes but plenty of players saw an opportunity to add someone at a position that has been a wasteland all year. Even if he wasnt named the starter he would have been a great te start just because he was going to get more run at QB even if Jameis started.
Posted on 11/21/20 at 9:07 am to Fleur De Lethal
quote:
This wasnt a one day friday night shocker.
Exactly. If no one added him when waivers first ran they weren’t paying attention.
Posted on 11/21/20 at 6:59 pm to RB10
Taysom named starter Nov 20th. Which is Friday.
Page 4 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News