- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 9/12/14 at 3:32 pm to BhamTigah
quote:
#Browns Gordon is getting no special treatment, lg source says. Just going by terms of the new policy. (4th violation equals 10 games).
Posted on 9/12/14 at 3:32 pm to Lester Earl
Except it wouldn't be a violation under the new policy
Posted on 9/12/14 at 3:33 pm to Lester Earl
Again, that doesn't even make sense.
Under the new policy, he didn't test positive. His third violation was last year for codeine....so.....yeah
Under the new policy, he didn't test positive. His third violation was last year for codeine....so.....yeah
Posted on 9/12/14 at 3:33 pm to Ash Williams
except he failed a test under the old one is my guess
Posted on 9/12/14 at 3:33 pm to tween the hedges
Thought part of the deal of getting the suspension down from 4 to 2 was to about stage 3? Failing that test should have put him in stage 4 but he never failed any tests in stage 4
Posted on 9/12/14 at 3:35 pm to Byron Bojangles III
quote:
Thought part of the deal of getting the suspension down from 4 to 2 was to about stage 3? Failing that test should have put him in stage 4 but he never failed any tests in stage 4
He is in stage 3.
The positive test last year put him in stage 4, hence the year long suspension.
I don't know. Maybe what the league is saying is that....his positive test came in 2013 so he's shite out of luck and it still counts....but under the new policy, a fourth failed test is only 10 games, not a full season.
That's the only thing that would work.
But even so, it's still bullshite because he was suspended in 2014
Posted on 9/12/14 at 3:36 pm to Byron Bojangles III
quote:
he never failed any tests in stage 4
Yup. These reporters are all out of whack right now trying to cover the Rice story and the constantly updating player's contract amendments.
Posted on 9/12/14 at 3:36 pm to jimithing11
He hasn't failed a test under the new policy. It doesnt look like they are just going to erase the old failed test. Rather they are going to reduce the suspension based on what the new policy says(the punishment).
This post was edited on 9/12/14 at 3:37 pm
Posted on 9/12/14 at 3:40 pm to Lester Earl
that's what I just said. Maybe I didn't word it correctly 
Posted on 9/12/14 at 3:41 pm to jimithing11
i was typing as you were posting, i do believe.
Posted on 9/12/14 at 3:43 pm to Lester Earl
If this is the case, it still is quite shitty since it wouldn't be a failed test under the new policy. It's a gray area for sure, but one that gives him strong reason for litigation. This isn't going away
Posted on 9/12/14 at 3:44 pm to jimithing11
Michael Salfino @MichaelSalfino
"So Gordon is getting suspended for 10 games because this violation that wasn't a violation was his fourth violation. Got it!"
"Do any of these reports make sense if you think about it for a minute?
"Do not react to any of these reports as fact. Just. Chill."
"So Gordon is getting suspended for 10 games because this violation that wasn't a violation was his fourth violation. Got it!"
"Do any of these reports make sense if you think about it for a minute?
"Do not react to any of these reports as fact. Just. Chill."
Posted on 9/12/14 at 3:45 pm to apd76
im putting my faith in this guy
Posted on 9/12/14 at 3:45 pm to Midget Death Squad
quote:
. This isn't going away
bet it does
quote:
f this is the case, it still is quite shitty since it wouldn't be a failed test under the new policy.
He's lucky to even be getting a reduced sentence, as is.
Posted on 9/12/14 at 3:46 pm to Midget Death Squad
Don't know if this has been posted: PFT: Josh Gordon’s status still unclear under new policy
quote:
On the surface, the new rules suggest Gordon shouldn’t be suspended at all. He tested at 16 ng/ml, one over the old limit of 15 ng/ml. With the limit increasing to 35 ng/ml, Gordon in theory should have his ban released completely.
One source tells PFT that Gordon’s suspension won’t be zero, due to other factors. Possibly complicating matters is that the positive triggering the one-year suspension occurred on March 5, six days before the date on which the league year began.
Posted on 9/12/14 at 3:46 pm to Lester Earl
I can't take this.
I'm going to avoid all Josh Gordon news until tonight.
I'm going to avoid all Josh Gordon news until tonight.
Posted on 9/12/14 at 3:47 pm to boom roasted
quote:
I'm going to avoid all Josh Gordon news until tonight.
... As you f5 this thread
Posted on 9/12/14 at 3:50 pm to Lester Earl
quote:
He's lucky to even be getting a reduced sentence, as is.
Posted on 9/12/14 at 3:50 pm to drizztiger
quote:
Chris Mortensen ?@mortreport 4m
Once player reps vote within hour or so, names of those reinstated players will be made public. In double-digits not expected to exceed 20
Page 69 of 119
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News