- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

History buffs are gonna love the 2nd amendment trial
Posted on 11/3/21 at 11:52 am
Posted on 11/3/21 at 11:52 am
Can't link because it was America's 1st news Radio this morning.
There is gonna be a gun case before the USSC. Plaintiff vs. New York over the right to carry on the street. Seems NY (and 6 other states) won't give you a permit just because you want defense against a random act of violence.
Well, the plaintiffs are gonna prove the intent of the founders who wrote the 2nd by introducing English common law cases from the Middle Ages. The point being that the founders were ardent students of British law and much of the Bill of Rights stems from British cases.
I wonder what NY's response is going to be.
There is gonna be a gun case before the USSC. Plaintiff vs. New York over the right to carry on the street. Seems NY (and 6 other states) won't give you a permit just because you want defense against a random act of violence.
Well, the plaintiffs are gonna prove the intent of the founders who wrote the 2nd by introducing English common law cases from the Middle Ages. The point being that the founders were ardent students of British law and much of the Bill of Rights stems from British cases.
I wonder what NY's response is going to be.
Posted on 11/3/21 at 11:53 am to Zach
quote:
I wonder what NY's response is going to be.
NO STANDING
RACIST
REEEEEEEEEE
Posted on 11/3/21 at 11:59 am to Zach
quote:
Well, the plaintiffs are gonna prove the intent of the founders who wrote the 2nd by introducing English common law cases from the Middle Ages
If they can successfully pull this off, could this mean the end of all permits for a firearm?
The Founders clearly never envisioned government controlled permits for firearms.
Posted on 11/3/21 at 12:02 pm to CoachChappy
quote:
If they can successfully pull this off, could this mean the end of all permits for a firearm?
It means the standard for getting a permit will be 'I want one'. But the permits will still be necessary to avoid underage children and felons to get permits.
Another issue will be cost. If you have the right to carry a gun then the permits will be free. It's your right.
This post was edited on 11/3/21 at 12:03 pm
Posted on 11/3/21 at 12:04 pm to Zach
quote:
There is gonna be a gun case before the USSC. Plaintiff vs. New York over the right to carry on the street. Seems NY (and 6 other states) won't give you a permit just because you want defense against a random act of violence.
It was argued before the Court, this morning. Ended about 11:00 a.m.
Posted on 11/3/21 at 12:05 pm to Zach
quote:
But the permits will still be necessary to avoid underage children and felons to get permits.
Because the only people that carry are people with permits.
Posted on 11/3/21 at 12:06 pm to CoachChappy
quote:
If they can successfully pull this off, could this mean the end of all permits for a firearm?
Add in Nukes and F15s and we've got a deal
Posted on 11/3/21 at 12:09 pm to Zach
quote:"We only care about laws in other countries today that support our agendas"
I wonder what NY's response is going to be.
Posted on 11/3/21 at 12:14 pm to Zach
quote:
means the standard for getting a permit will be 'I want one'. But the permits will still be necessary to avoid underage children and felons to get permits.
Another issue will be cost. If you have the right to carry a gun then the permits will be free. It's your right.
Will this apply to permits for suppressors and full auto?
Posted on 11/3/21 at 12:14 pm to Zach
quote:
Another issue will be cost. If you have the right to carry a gun then the permits will be free. It's your right.
I agree it should be free but thats totally not how it will work out.
you have the right to hunt and fish, etc., those need a license and are not free.
Posted on 11/3/21 at 12:15 pm to Zach
I did a paper on the 2A years ago. It was steeped in English law and precedent. This is a good thing in this case
Posted on 11/3/21 at 12:16 pm to CoachChappy
quote:
If they can successfully pull this off, could this mean the end of all permits for a firearm?
One could only hope that this would repeal the NFA and neuter the ATF
Posted on 11/3/21 at 12:21 pm to CoachChappy
quote:With one addition, I agree wholeheartedly.
The Founders clearly never envisioned (Federal) government controlled permits for firearms.
The Bill of Rights (including the Second Amendment) was intended to constrain the actions of the central government, not those of the States or their subsidiaries. The Incorporation Doctrine is a cancer upon the Constitution.
This post was edited on 11/3/21 at 12:33 pm
Posted on 11/3/21 at 12:26 pm to AMS
quote:
you have the right to hunt and fish, etc., those need a license and are not free.
But it's not in the Constitution. The right to drive a car is not in the Constitution so you have to pay for your license.
Posted on 11/3/21 at 12:28 pm to Zach
What are the other five states?
I know that NY is notorious for not wanting to hand out licenses unless someone is politically connected.
Less sure about the others. NJ? CT? MA? DE? MD?
I know that NY is notorious for not wanting to hand out licenses unless someone is politically connected.
Less sure about the others. NJ? CT? MA? DE? MD?
Posted on 11/3/21 at 12:31 pm to Zach
I've always thought they had an angle in places like NY by going after unequal protection under the law. You can get a permit, you just have to be rich and/or connected. But I'm an engineer and I like logic, which frequently has no place in the courtroom.
Posted on 11/3/21 at 12:49 pm to teke184
quote:
What are the other five states?
Calif, NJ, Rhode Island and I can't remember after that.
Posted on 11/3/21 at 12:52 pm to Zach
Driving a car is a privilege, not a right. frick up too many times on the road and the privilege can be taken away from you. Same with voting… you become a felon and the privilege to vote is taken away.
Posted on 11/3/21 at 1:08 pm to GumpInLex
quote:
Driving a car is a privilege, not a right. frick up too many times on the road and the privilege can be taken away from you. Same with voting… you become a felon and the privilege to vote is taken away.
Fine, then the same applies to hunting and fishing. You don't have a right guaranteed in the Constitution to practice either one.
Posted on 11/3/21 at 1:14 pm to Zach
quote:
The point being that the founders were ardent students of British law and much of the Bill of Rights stems from British cases.
I wonder what NY's response is going to be.
That the Brits evolved and eventually banned guns and America should too would be my guess.
Back to top


11









