Follow The $Money

Is Black Rock the one buying up residential real estate at above-market prices?

quote:

---

China wuhan lab owned by Glaxo Smith Cline *Glaxo Smith Cline owns Pfizer *Wuhan lab funded (tax payer money) by Fauci *Fauci promotes vaccine *Glaxo Smith Cline managed by BlackRock finance division *BlackRock manages open society foundation (George Soros) *BlackRock is major share holder in Microsoft (Bill Gates) *Gates major share holder of Pfizer which sells vaccine and sponsors the WHO (world health organization)

---

The first two aren’t true.
Not even close to true.
Quit posting emails.

Where are your sources? You seem to be leaving out some very key pieces of information and “ties”.

quote:

---

*Glaxo Smith Cline owns Pfizer

---

There is a strong connection here, got this off Wiki(I know, I know):

quote:

---

In December 2018, GSK announced that it, along with Pfizer, had reached an agreement to merge and combine their consumer healthcare divisions into a single entity. The combined entity would have sales of around £9.8 billion ($12.7 billion), with GSK maintaining a 68% controlling stake in the joint venture. Pfizer would own the remaining 32% shareholding. The deal builds on an earlier 2018 deal where GSK bought out Novartis' stake in the GSK-Novartis consumer healthcare joint business.

---

quote:

---

Follow The $Money

---

If people are on politics board and can't figure out that major corporations are all owned and ran by a small group of internationalists well heaven help you. The boards and CEOs are a small group of people that don't give a shite about you. One day you will wake up and realize we have been usurped since Lincoln was killed, completely so after the Federal Reserve.

"Yes, Germany was back then a democracy, before us and we’ve been plundered and squeezed dry. No more. What does democracy or authoritarian state mean for those international hyenas? They don’t care at all! They are only interested in one thing. Are you willing to be plundered? Yes or no? Are you stupid enough to keep quiet in the process? Yes or no? And, when a democracy is stupid enough not to stand up, then it is good! But when an authoritarian state declares “You do not plunder our people any longer”, neither from the inside or outside, then that is bad. In reality, money rules in these countries. They talk about press freedom when in fact these newspapers have one owner and the owner is, in any case, the sponsor. This press then shapes public opinion, these political parties don’t have any differences at all, like before with us. You already know the old political parties. They were all the same. Then people must think that especially in these countries of freedom and wealth, there should exist a very comfortable life for its people, but the opposite is the case. In these countries, in the so-called “Democracies”, the people are by no means the main focus of attention. What really matters is the existence of this group of “Democracy makers”. That is, the existence of a few hundred of giant capitalists who own all the factories and shares and who, ultimately, lead the people. They are not interested at all in the great mass of people, they are the only ones who can be addressed as international elements because they conduct their business everywhere. It is a small, rootless, international clique that is turning the people against each other, that does not want them to have peace. They can suppress us! They can kill us, if you like! But we will not capitulate!" -- Adolf Hitler

quote:

---

*China wuhan lab owned by Glaxo Smith Cline
*Glaxo Smith Cline owns Pfizer
*Wuhan lab funded (tax payer money) by Fauci
*Fauci promotes vaccine
*Glaxo Smith Cline managed by BlackRock finance division
*BlackRock manages open society foundation (George Soros)
*BlackRock is major share holder in Microsoft (Bill Gates)
*Gates major share holder of Pfizer which sells vaccine and sponsors the WHO (world health organization)

---

Best post of the week.

quote:

---

Follow The $Money

---

And it doesn't matter the topic