- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Wait til the world learns the vaxxed are the dangerous ones: 251x viral load as unvaxxed
Posted on 8/24/21 at 1:17 pm to omegaman66
Posted on 8/24/21 at 1:17 pm to omegaman66
quote:
Not if you are trying to increase the spread. Which they are.
Geez....
0
Posted on 8/24/21 at 1:18 pm to 00 Tech Grad
So the takeaway is that a legit study is concluding that the vaccinated who say "I did this to save you!" are misled into thinking that they are safe to be around, but instead may be a potential danger to the unvaccinated. Is that right?
Posted on 8/24/21 at 1:20 pm to D500MAG
quote:
Does not change the fact that the vaccinated, WHO ARE NOT REQUIRED TO TEST, are walking around spreading it.
It is a reward for getting vaccinated. Also 250x higher than the original covid is a 75% reduction in viral load since unvaccinated people have 1000x higher than the original covid viral load. The unvaccinated are required to be tested because they are 4x more likely to infect others than the vaccinated.
Posted on 8/24/21 at 1:20 pm to 00 Tech Grad
quote:
Wait til the world learns the vaxxed are the dangerous ones: 251x viral load as unvaxxed
Vaxxtards on suicide watch!
Posted on 8/24/21 at 1:22 pm to 00 Tech Grad
Where is the link to the study?
Your link is to an antivacc site blaming vacc’s for autism
Your link is to an antivacc site blaming vacc’s for autism
This post was edited on 8/24/21 at 1:35 pm
Posted on 8/24/21 at 1:23 pm to AMS
It took five minutes to read the publication and discover that OP is full of shite.
This why people don't take you guys seriously.
This why people don't take you guys seriously.
Posted on 8/24/21 at 1:24 pm to Cosmo
Posted on 8/24/21 at 1:25 pm to FooManChoo
quote:
So the takeaway is that a legit study is concluding that the vaccinated who say "I did this to save you!" are misled into thinking that they are safe to be around, but instead may be a potential danger to the unvaccinated. Is that right?
That's what "Children's Health Defense" wants you to conclude. They want you to conclude that all vaccines are unsafe and ineffective. They're an anti-vax outfit.
Posted on 8/24/21 at 1:25 pm to D500MAG
D500MAG
Typically the vaccinated people wear a mask too.
It seems that you are for free dumb and not pro life.
Typically the vaccinated people wear a mask too.
It seems that you are for free dumb and not pro life.
Posted on 8/24/21 at 1:26 pm to WeeWee
quote:
It is a reward for getting vaccinated. Also 250x higher than the original covid is a 75% reduction in viral load since unvaccinated people have 1000x higher than the original covid viral load. The unvaccinated are required to be tested because they are 4x more likely to infect others than the vaccinated.
Ok, so......
Superdome about 75,000 seats?
50% unvaccinated negative tests
50% vaccinated no tests
What's gonna happen? Engineered spread of virus?
Posted on 8/24/21 at 1:27 pm to WeeWee
quote:
Comparing breakthrough delta cases to the original covid-19 strain is a bad comparison since individuals with delta (vaccinated and unvaccinated) have 1000x higher viral load than individuals infected with the original virus.
This may suggest that broad indiscriminate vaccinating into an ongoing pandemic is unwise, possibly dangerous and might provide an opportunity to the virus’s adaptive mechanisms to spin out vaccine resistant variants.
LINK
quote:
It’s not that new variants of Covid-19 virus come into existence due to vaccination. It’s that those mutated variants resistant to the vaccine are favored. The resistant viruses are still able to infect the vaccinated human host and, thus, spread more prolifically through viral shedding.
Posted on 8/24/21 at 1:30 pm to TigerDoc
quote:In addition to this, let's just pretend what the OP thought he was representing was true and follow the logic trail...
The idea is to misrepresent a medical study to people without technical medical knowledge to stoke their fear about vaccine when the study isn't even comparing vaxxed and unvaxxed.
For the past year nonstop, this place has stated we can't avoid, we're all going to catch it at some point, and we need to just open it back up, and let the chips fall where they may so we get to herd immunity as quickly as possible. Not to mention, that COVID isn't a big deal, 99.9% survival rate, etc.
Given that logic, shouldn't this "news" plus getting vaccinated be the absolute safest and quickest way to get to herd immunity? Or...are we moving the goalposts now?
Posted on 8/24/21 at 1:32 pm to Luke
quote:
It’s a gamble...
That's what happens when a BIOLOGICAL weapon attacks people with a certain genetic makeup. We can stop calling it a VIRUS whenever you want.
Posted on 8/24/21 at 1:32 pm to ShinerHorns
quote:
Those who got vaccinated are sick in the head. They don’t care, unfortunately.
Most are just poorly informed, or too trusting of authority. Others are very knowledgeable, but limit their knowledge to certain sources (the medical version of ABCCBSNBC/GWPBAD syndrome). There are many well-educated medical and science people that say caution is advised due to initial bad reactions and potential future problems. There are many well-educated medical and science people that say that no caution is needed. A wise person would sit this out for a while.
Posted on 8/24/21 at 1:33 pm to TigerCoon
quote:
I wonder if twitter will now block posts from one of the finest universities in the world.
LOL. The Oxford University Clinical Research Unit is a Vietnamese organization. I'm not sure what its international reputation is, but it is not associated with the University of Oxford.
Posted on 8/24/21 at 1:36 pm to Dday63
It went through the Oxford IRB so I assume they're affiliated with Oxford. It was also published in the Lancet, so it's a top 5 medical journal.
But, all that notwithstanding, it doesn't say what OP claims it does.
But, all that notwithstanding, it doesn't say what OP claims it does.
Posted on 8/24/21 at 1:36 pm to TigerDoc
quote:
They're an anti-vax outfit.
Yep. This is a jenny Mccarthy site and its getting tons of upvotes on here
Board is lost
Posted on 8/24/21 at 1:37 pm to TigerDoc
quote:
But, all that notwithstanding, it doesn't say what OP claims it does.
It simply says symptomatic vaxxed can spread just as easily as symptomatic unvaxxed
I dont see the 251x part
Posted on 8/24/21 at 1:37 pm to Dday63
quote:
LOL. The Oxford University Clinical Research Unit is a Vietnamese organization. I'm not sure what its international reputation is, but it is not associated with the University of Oxford.
bwah. My mistake.
Posted on 8/24/21 at 1:39 pm to WeeWee
quote:
he unvaccinated are required to be tested because they are 4x more likely to infect others than the vaccinated.
Unvaccinated, including those with natural immunity?
Page 3 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News