Started By
Message

re: Wait til the world learns the vaxxed are the dangerous ones: 251x viral load as unvaxxed

Posted on 8/24/21 at 1:40 pm to
Posted by loogaroo
Welsh
Member since Dec 2005
31628 posts
Posted on 8/24/21 at 1:40 pm to
quote:

Vaccinated parents are passing this to kids in a super concentrated form.


I'm starting to believe this.
Posted by Metaloctopus
Louisiana
Member since Nov 2018
6028 posts
Posted on 8/24/21 at 1:40 pm to
Don't tell this to the tiger rant. They are in there patting each other on their backs and celebrating their "victory" of having jabs forced on them to watch a game. They can't stop high fiving long enough to listen to reason. It's nauseating.

Edit- oh look, the rant followed me in here to downvote because I hurt their feelings.
This post was edited on 8/24/21 at 1:53 pm
Posted by jmon
Mandeville, LA
Member since Oct 2010
8474 posts
Posted on 8/24/21 at 1:44 pm to
This article does not prove what you think it proves.
Posted by League Champs
Bayou Self
Member since Oct 2012
10340 posts
Posted on 8/24/21 at 1:44 pm to
quote:

Also 250x higher than the original covid is a 75% reduction in viral load since unvaccinated people have 1000x higher than the original covid viral load. The unvaccinated are required to be tested because they are 4x more likely to infect others than the vaccinated.

Scary that you think this is a winning argument.

The original virus has record deaths associated with it. So in your feeble attempt to justify a vaccine you claim its better to have a lower viral count with more deaths, than a magnified viral count, even among the vaccinated? We didn't even overwhelm hospitals with the original virus, because people just died off. 500M of them!! Yet somehow that was less of a threat, due to less viral load, and whatnot?

I think the point the vaccinated are missing with this Oxford study is that vaccines are masking the dangers associated with further mutations. Even a smaller viral load of CoVID is deadlier than Delta. But we are suddenly glossing over the fact that the vaxxed are now carriers of these higher viral loads.

The next mutation could be a lower, deadlier viral load that infects the unconcerned vaccinated. But that's where we have made our final stand; acceptance of a vaccine that allows transmission, rather than therapeutics to ward off the deadly reactions of the body.
Posted by j1897
Member since Nov 2011
3600 posts
Posted on 8/24/21 at 1:44 pm to
You should learn to read!!!


Mods should delete stupid shite like this.

quote:

Viral loads of breakthrough Delta variant infection cases were 251 times higher than those of cases infected with old strains



Jesus Christ, stop lying to push your dumb agenda.
Posted by TigerDoc
Texas
Member since Apr 2004
9915 posts
Posted on 8/24/21 at 1:44 pm to
quote:

We found viral loads of breakthrough Delta variant infection cases peaked around 2-3 days before and after the development of symptoms, and were 251 times higher than those of the infected cases detected during the early phase of the pandemic in 2020.


As others have said previously in this thread, they're comparing viral load with alpha in 2020 with delta in 2021.

OP is FOS.
This post was edited on 8/24/21 at 2:00 pm
Posted by Hangover Haven
Metry
Member since Oct 2013
26961 posts
Posted on 8/24/21 at 1:48 pm to
Jesus Christ... It was a study based in a third world country...
Posted by Tiguar
Montana
Member since Mar 2012
33131 posts
Posted on 8/24/21 at 1:48 pm to
Ironically that Oxford preprint is actually pretty impressive data for vaccination.
Posted by David_DJS
Member since Aug 2005
18311 posts
Posted on 8/24/21 at 1:49 pm to
quote:

As other's have said previously in this thread, they're comparing viral load with alpha in 2020 with delta in 2021.

OP is FOS.

If only you held public health and your industry to the same standard. The Covid shitshow has as its foundation morons comparing apples to oranges and convincing the retarded it’s “science”.
Posted by Cosmo
glassman's guest house
Member since Oct 2003
120774 posts
Posted on 8/24/21 at 1:51 pm to
This is how fake news spreads and a delusion grows
Posted by Damone
FoCo
Member since Aug 2016
32966 posts
Posted on 8/24/21 at 1:51 pm to
The Astra Zeneca vaccine lmao
Posted by IslandBuckeye
Boca Chica, Panama
Member since Apr 2018
10067 posts
Posted on 8/24/21 at 1:51 pm to
quote:

Most are just poorly informed, or too trusting of authority


This. I took the vax last December. I have never pushed it on anyone. this decision was based on information available at the time. It was also due to working in a hospital and trying to protect our patients.

If this bothers some of the others in this thread, too fricking bad.
Posted by loogaroo
Welsh
Member since Dec 2005
31628 posts
Posted on 8/24/21 at 1:52 pm to
quote:

think the point the vaccinated are missing with this Oxford study is that vaccines are masking the dangers associated with further mutations. Even a smaller viral load of CoVID is deadlier than Delta. But we are suddenly glossing over the fact that the vaxxed are now carriers of these higher viral loads.

The next mutation could be a lower, deadlier viral load that infects the unconcerned vaccinated. But that's where we have made our final stand; acceptance of a vaccine that allows transmission, rather than therapeutics to ward off the deadly reactions of the body.


Nail on head.
Posted by League Champs
Bayou Self
Member since Oct 2012
10340 posts
Posted on 8/24/21 at 1:54 pm to
quote:

Ironically that Oxford preprint is actually pretty impressive data for vaccination.

No, it certainly doesn't.

It serves to lull the vaccinated into sleep while waiting on another low load, more deadly variant like the original. Which the unsuspecting vaxxed will now transmit freely, is a disaster in the making.
Posted by Cosmo
glassman's guest house
Member since Oct 2003
120774 posts
Posted on 8/24/21 at 1:55 pm to
quote:

serves to lull the vaccinated into sleep while waiting on another low load, more deadly variant like the original.


Wow
Posted by TigerDoc
Texas
Member since Apr 2004
9915 posts
Posted on 8/24/21 at 1:56 pm to
It is. Delta is just a beast at replicating in the mucosa and the vaccine just doesn't generate the IgA necessary to keep vaccinated people from shedding large amount of virus. I have some former students working on review of intranasal vaccine. It's only in stage I trial, but if that pans out it could potentially be great for cutting down on presymptomatic/asymptomatic infection.
This post was edited on 8/24/21 at 2:00 pm
Posted by AMS
Member since Apr 2016
6501 posts
Posted on 8/24/21 at 1:58 pm to
quote:

I think the point the vaccinated are missing with this Oxford study is that vaccines are masking the dangers associated with further mutations. Even a smaller viral load of CoVID is deadlier than Delta. But we are suddenly glossing over the fact that the vaxxed are now carriers of these higher viral loads.


no one is glossing over the fact that delta variants today have higher viral loads than people who had alpha in march-april 2020. people are misunderstanding likely due to an incorrect propaganda spin on the data that this study's comparison was between delta 2021 and alpha 2020. vaccinated delta has lower load than unvaxxed delta. either type of delta is higher than alpha.


the virus is going to mutate whether vaccinated or unvaccinated, period. mutations happen as a result of replication which requires a host+infection. vaccines decrease the rate of infection. its simple math, vaccines decrease mutations by decreasing replication as more potential hosts are immune. you can maybe argue that vaccines 'guide' mutations but its complete nonsense to suggest that the vaccine is causing mutants more than unvaxxed.
Posted by David_DJS
Member since Aug 2005
18311 posts
Posted on 8/24/21 at 2:03 pm to
quote:

This is how fake news spreads and a delusion grows

Explain what's fake.

Are we counting Covid deaths the same way we do flu deaths? If we counted flu deaths the same way we do Covid deaths, what would a bad flu season look like?

What's the Covid mortality rate for a healthy/fit 45 yo? How does it compare to the flu mortality rate for healthy/fit 45 yos?

What's the Covid mortality rate for 12 year olds? How does it compare to the flu mortality rate for 12 year olds?

I am right in a literal way when I say the Covid shitshow has been based on apples/oranges comparisons.

And you're wrong if you think delusion is the product of the BS on the side opposite Covid fear/mandates. The delusion comes from public health/healthcare being wrong and dishonest throughout the pandemic.
Posted by meauxses
Member since Nov 2012
2704 posts
Posted on 8/24/21 at 2:08 pm to
Nobody followed you.

You're being downvoted because you assume this is a gotcha article for your viewpoint when in reality the article is completely misrepresenting the study it is linking.

Oh...shocker! You didn't actually read it!
Posted by AMS
Member since Apr 2016
6501 posts
Posted on 8/24/21 at 2:11 pm to
quote:


Explain what's fake


its fake because of the propagandist website's spin which is inconsistent with the actual study itself. you will probably come away with a much different message if you read the study instead of taking a well known anti-vax propagandists word for it.

quote:

And you're wrong if you think delusion is the product of the BS on the side opposite Covid fear/mandates. The delusion comes from public health/healthcare being wrong and dishonest throughout the pandemic.


... you realize the article you are defending is a perfect example of delusional BS from 'the side opposite covid fear/mandates' as it is wrong and dishonest?
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram