- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Harvard research group: Black Lives Matter Protesters Were Overwhelmingly Peaceful
Posted on 6/11/21 at 12:01 pm to Cs
Posted on 6/11/21 at 12:01 pm to Cs
It’s the MSM. Same as always. They want the exciting story, and people protesting peacefully ain’t it, so they focused on the 2% or so where shite went down. And even among that, it was primarily instigated by the police getting out of line.
Posted on 6/11/21 at 12:12 pm to Cs
quote:
When the Department of Homeland Security released its Homeland Threat Assessment earlier this month, it emphasized that self-proclaimed white supremacist groups are the most dangerous threat to U.S. security.
This is what caught my attention. It’s not “self-proclaimed” when someone else decides what you are.
Posted on 6/11/21 at 12:30 pm to Cs
quote:
Black Lives Matter Protesters Were Overwhelmingly Peaceful
K
Next time host their events on Harvard's property, and the personal property of those who created this "study".
Posted on 6/11/21 at 12:33 pm to Cs
If a man only beats the shite out of his wife for 10 seconds every day, he is overwhelming peaceful that day.
Posted on 6/11/21 at 12:35 pm to Cs
So they counted a 10 person BLM protest in BFE Georgia where no one paid attention as one of the peaceful protests.
Ok. I agree. That’s fine.
But now let’s break the protests done by city size.
I don’t think that will bode well for progstain led cities. So we better not do that.
Ok. I agree. That’s fine.
But now let’s break the protests done by city size.
I don’t think that will bode well for progstain led cities. So we better not do that.
Posted on 6/11/21 at 12:38 pm to Cs
So 97.7 percent non violent = peaceful but 99.7% survivable = OMG your going to die so mask up and close down!
Posted on 6/11/21 at 12:41 pm to Cs
quote:
n short, our data suggest that 96.3% of events involved no property damage or police injuries, and in 97.7% of events, no injuries were reported among participants, bystanders or police
Yet we know > $3,000,000,000 dollars was lost in this 3.7%.... yeah, I'd like some of what they're smoking.
Posted on 6/11/21 at 1:07 pm to Cs
quote:I can’t wait until their “research” comes out on the peaceful/violent ratio for 1/6. Any day now…
Harvard research group: Black Lives Matter Protesters Were Overwhelmingly Peaceful
Posted on 6/11/21 at 1:11 pm to Cs
Does Harvard even play in the SEC? Their school is shite!
Posted on 6/11/21 at 1:14 pm to Cs
quote:
Protesters Were Overwhelmingly Peaceful
It's a play on words. It's similar to the ole "world has 2 billion Muslims but only 1 million are violent".
If 20,000 people were at a BLM march it is probably true that only 4,000 of them were violent, rioting, looting fools. So in that context, they are probably right.
Posted on 6/11/21 at 1:24 pm to Cs
My eyeballs tell me something totally different.
Posted on 6/11/21 at 2:04 pm to Cs
4.7% of 7305 is 343.
So there was property damage or police injuries in 343 different protests.
But peaceful.
So there was property damage or police injuries in 343 different protests.
But peaceful.
Posted on 6/11/21 at 2:07 pm to Cs
They must have gotten all of their research material from the DNC and CNN.
![](https://external-content.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fmedia1.tenor.com%2Fimages%2F69032978be26c6b6d68280ee5af7a784%2Ftenor.gif%3Fitemid%3D12794093&f=1&nofb=1)
![](https://external-content.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fmedia1.tenor.com%2Fimages%2F69032978be26c6b6d68280ee5af7a784%2Ftenor.gif%3Fitemid%3D12794093&f=1&nofb=1)
Posted on 6/11/21 at 2:14 pm to Cs
quote:
police or counterprotesters were reportedly directing it at the protesters
And there's the twist. When you define anyone engaging in violence automatically as "counterprotestors" or conveniently blame police when it's HIGHLY doubtful you had enough evidence to draw a contextual timeline of events, you can basically conclude whatever you want. If they were violent, they were some other unnamed group of "counterprotestors". If the police responded with any forceful tactic, they were the cause of the violence they were responding to.
Pure propaganda garbage, but because it has the "Harvard" label, it's gospel.
Posted on 6/11/21 at 2:17 pm to Cs
They seem to have left off the assassination of David Dorn.
This post was edited on 6/11/21 at 2:20 pm
Posted on 6/11/21 at 2:21 pm to Cs
quote:
Here is what we have found based on the 7,305 events we’ve collected
Maybe inflated the events to get the % down a bit?
Posted on 6/11/21 at 2:30 pm to Cs
These cünts really think we’re going to just take their word for it? The old “who are you going to believe, me or your lying eyes?” defense.
Posted on 6/11/21 at 2:34 pm to Cs
Who are you going to believe? The Harvard researchers or your lying eyes?
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)