- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Chauvin juror defends participation in March on Washington after social media post surface
Posted on 5/3/21 at 5:24 pm to AMS
Posted on 5/3/21 at 5:24 pm to AMS
quote:
MLK march is in DC not minneapolis. unless theres more evidence to see theres nothing wrong here.
Did you totally ignore his shirt that says “take your knee off our necks”?
you are a fricking clown 
2
Posted on 5/3/21 at 5:31 pm to Lynxrufus2012
quote:
It only matters if people marched January 6th, don't you know.
I think it's time we test that fence around the capitol, to be real honest
Posted on 5/3/21 at 5:32 pm to AMS
quote:
If MLK march was about police brutality maybe this is a problem, but Im just not sure thats what MLK march is about.
If only there were articles out there about the march discussing the speeches about police brutality and images filled with blm shirts, we could get to the bottom of it.
NYT
Posted on 5/3/21 at 5:33 pm to frankthetank
If I were Chauvin’s attorney, I would have a chubby at this point.
Posted on 5/3/21 at 5:38 pm to kbro
quote:
The juror is literally in a picture with a guy wearing a BLM shirt with MLKs picture that says get your knee off our neck.
{AMS has left the chat}
Posted on 5/3/21 at 5:39 pm to WaWaWeeWa
quote:
Did you totally ignore his shirt that says “take your knee off our necks”?
you are a fricking clown
I simply read the question he was asked... and unless DC was moved into Minneapolis there is no issue with answering no to that question.
Posted on 5/3/21 at 5:43 pm to AMS
Your desire to convict someone at all costs will kill more people than cops kneeing on someone. No society is free where there is no right to a fair trial.
Posted on 5/3/21 at 5:44 pm to AMS
I have a question my commie friend, do you honestly believe that this juror was impartial?
Posted on 5/3/21 at 5:45 pm to roadGator
He doesn’t care. Whatever gets to the desired outcome is what he wants.
Posted on 5/3/21 at 5:47 pm to kbro
quote:
The juror is literally in a picture with a guy wearing a BLM shirt with MLKs picture that says get your knee off our neck. That’s a direct reference to the Chauvin case. The caption mentions him as the next generation of activists. It couldn’t be more obvious that this would be a biased juror.
I didnt say the juror was not biased, he even disclosed being pro-BLM. I just dont see how the he answered 'no' to those 2 questions is perjury. like Daly from the article claims.
quote:
Nelson asked Mitchell several questions during jury selection, and Mitchell told him: He had watched clips of bystander video of the incident; he had talked about the case with his family, friends and co-workers; he had wondered why three other officers at the scene didn't stop Chauvin; and he had a "very favorable" opinion of Black Lives Matter. It's the attorneys' jobs to home in on issues and ferret out more detailed answers, said Daly, who praised Nelson's trial performance.
being biased isn't illegal and you can render an impartial decision even if you have biases. it seems like the defense attorneys should have done a better job to root out potential partiality due to bias in someone who had disclosed they were pro-BLM. this wont win an appeal.
Posted on 5/3/21 at 5:49 pm to frankthetank
quote:
This will be in the appeal.
It's cute that we still think he can get out on appeal. He was sacrificed for the BLM mob and none of these shitbag activist judges will let him out.
Posted on 5/3/21 at 5:50 pm to AMS
quote:
being biased isn't illegal and you can render an impartial decision even if you have biases. it seems like the defense attorneys should have done a better job to root out potential partiality due to bias in someone who had disclosed they were pro-BLM. this wont win an appeal.
He lied to the judge and defense lawyers, he's a piece of shite activist, and if things go correctly then Chauvin will win an appeal and #52 will face his own jury.
Posted on 5/3/21 at 5:51 pm to Clames
quote:
He lied to the judge and defense lawyers, he's a piece of shite activist, and if things go correctly then Chauvin will win an appeal and #52 will face his own jury.
can you cite the lie?
Posted on 5/3/21 at 5:51 pm to Clames
quote:
He lied to the judge and defense lawyers, he's a piece of shite activist, and if things go correctly then Chauvin will win an appeal and #52 will face his own jury.
None of this will happen. Justice is dying here in the USA. I’m not saying Chauvin should definitely win on appeal or that he should’ve been found not guilty. I’m just saying he isn’t going to get a fair hearing.
Posted on 5/3/21 at 5:53 pm to the808bass
It was always impossible for him to get an impartial hearing. Consequences of declaring people guilty in the public sphere immediately.
Posted on 5/3/21 at 5:55 pm to the808bass
I know he does not care one bit. Was just curious if there was an honest bone in his commie body.
Posted on 5/3/21 at 5:56 pm to AMS
quote:
can you cite the lie?
quote:
The second one asked, "Other than what you have already described above, have you, or anyone close to you, participated in protests about police use of force or police brutality?"
quote:
The Rev. Al Sharpton invoked Jacob Blake, who was shot by a police officer in Kenosha, Wis., on Sunday, and the Black shooting victims before him to demand a new national reckoning with hate and bigotry. “We didn’t come to start trouble,” he said, in an implicit rebuke to critics of the summer’s racial protests. “We came to stop trouble. You act like it’s no trouble to shoot us in the back. You act like it’s no trouble to put a chokehold on us while we scream ‘I can’t breathe’ 11 times.
quote:
For the thousands who came to the Lincoln Memorial on Friday, the country’s problem was not too little police presence but far too much.
The parade of speakers included family members of Mr. Blake and others who were shot in encounters with the police. They drew roars of approval from listeners, some of whom came hundreds of miles from Ohio, Georgia, Arizona and elsewhere.
quote:
The protest also sought to rally support for enacting the George Floyd Justice in Policing Act, backed by House Democrats and the Congressional Black Caucus. The bill would overhaul law enforcement training and conduct rules to try to limit police misconduct and racial bias. The national upheaval triggered by Mr. Floyd’s death at the hands of the Minneapolis police in May loomed large over the march, as did the sense among civil rights leaders that action this year could set the course of American race relations for years, if not decades.
“We can’t ignore the moment that we’re in,” said Kristen Clarke, the president of the Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, one of several groups that sponsored the protest. “This is a march that is very much needed right now, given the fires that are raging as we deal with police violence, racial violence and voter suppression. It’s created almost a perfect storm.”
Posted on 5/3/21 at 5:56 pm to the808bass
Oops
Posted on 5/3/21 at 5:57 pm to AMS
quote:
can you cite the lie?
When he stated "No" to the questions posed during jury selection. Are you really so dedicated to your ignorance?
Posted on 5/3/21 at 6:00 pm to AMS
quote:
this wont win an appeal.
So now you're a lawyer that specializes in appellate cases in addition to being a fake MD.
First of all, jury bias is about the clearest and easiest reason to file an appeal that there is. This is the second juror to be shown to have a pre-conceived bias involving the Chauvin trial.
You are innocent until PROVEN guilty in this country, and a jury with an admitted bias towards guilty pre-trial is a HUGE problem.
Why you can't see or understand this is a 'you' problem, because everyone else seemingly can. You, too, should step back and take a moment to think about your bias and how it's a problem.
It's like you have an AMS bat signal that calls you to these threads to prove to the "unwashed masses" that Chauvin should be thrown under the jail, and you can't recognize how a juror with your same mindset going into the trial would be a HUGE problem and against everything our judicial system stands for.
In short - you're extremely brainwashed and incapable of independent thought. You developed your guilty verdict back in May of last year; and you can't see why a juror that's just like you would be any issue. You're clueless.
Page 2 of 8
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News