Started By
Message

who is paying attention to womens diamond wedding rings

Posted on 3/8/21 at 9:19 pm
Posted by t00f
Not where you think I am
Member since Jul 2016
90533 posts
Posted on 3/8/21 at 9:19 pm
Lately on the radio I am hearing all the jewelry shops talking about 5k, 10k, 20k diamond wedding rings.

Biggest scam in global history. You young bucks save your money for a house instead of this bullshite.

who is even looking at these rings on womens finger except for some of those OT stalkers.
Posted by teke184
Zachary, LA
Member since Jan 2007
96438 posts
Posted on 3/8/21 at 9:20 pm to
Women compare this shite with each other and want to have the best ring possible out of all their friends and coworkers.
Posted by djangochained
Gardere
Member since Jul 2013
19054 posts
Posted on 3/8/21 at 9:20 pm to
Unless her ring finger is in front of her tits I’m not looking
Posted by Winston Cup
Dallas Cowboys Fan
Member since May 2016
65504 posts
Posted on 3/8/21 at 9:21 pm to
Posted by Jim Rockford
Member since May 2011
98336 posts
Posted on 3/8/21 at 9:22 pm to
quote:

who is even looking at these rings on womens finger except for some of those OT stalkers.





Fun fact: single women in the public eye often wear prominent engagement rings for that very reason.
Posted by Winston Cup
Dallas Cowboys Fan
Member since May 2016
65504 posts
Posted on 3/8/21 at 9:23 pm to
quote:

who is even looking at these rings on womens finger

I judge wedding rings irl
quote:

those OT stalkers

Notwithstanding
Posted by CaptainsWafer
TD Platinum Member
Member since Feb 2006
58385 posts
Posted on 3/8/21 at 9:25 pm to
Posted by soccerfüt
Location: A Series of Tubes
Member since May 2013
65902 posts
Posted on 3/8/21 at 9:25 pm to
quote:

Biggest scam in global history. You young bucks save your money for a house instead of this bullshite.
I got both.

Why begrudge someone wanting to do this for their wife to-be if they’re not a poor?
Posted by ell_13
Member since Apr 2013
85143 posts
Posted on 3/8/21 at 9:26 pm to
quote:

Biggest scam in global history.
covid
Posted by USMEagles
Member since Jan 2018
11811 posts
Posted on 3/8/21 at 9:26 pm to
quote:


Biggest scam in global history.


Reddit down again?
Posted by Aspercel
Member since Jan 2009
106699 posts
Posted on 3/8/21 at 9:28 pm to
You know how much more fun that would be to spend on a horse?






Posted by RexKramer
Chicago
Member since Nov 2020
411 posts
Posted on 3/8/21 at 9:29 pm to
Just had my wife's ring appraise for over 100% of purchase price. Thats 20yrs, now I have to up the insurance. She's not taking it to the grave, lol.
Posted by meaux5
New York, NY
Member since Sep 2010
11011 posts
Posted on 3/8/21 at 9:31 pm to
quote:

Biggest scam in global history. You young bucks save your money for a house instead of this bullshite.


Try explaining this to a woman
Posted by Sun God
Member since Jul 2009
44874 posts
Posted on 3/8/21 at 9:32 pm to
Posted by LegendInMyMind
Member since Apr 2019
54838 posts
Posted on 3/8/21 at 9:34 pm to
The diamond rarity racket is the greatest grift in the history of mankind.
Posted by Gaston
Dirty Coast
Member since Aug 2008
39062 posts
Posted on 3/8/21 at 9:36 pm to
5k just out of college, 10k 10 yrs into the workforce, 20k full on successful professional....doesn’t seem that crazy.
Posted by Kafka
I am the moral conscience of TD
Member since Jul 2007
142485 posts
Posted on 3/8/21 at 9:36 pm to
How an Ad Campaign Invented the Diamond Engagement Ring

In the 1930s, few Americans proposed with the precious stone. Then everything changed.
quote:

That invention is surprisingly recent: Epstein traces its origins to the discovery of massive diamond mines in South Africa in the late 19th century, which for the first time flooded world markets with diamonds. The British businessmen operating the South African mines recognized that only by maintaining the fiction that diamonds were scarce and inherently valuable could they protect their investments and buoy diamond prices. They did so by launching a South Africa–based cartel, De Beers Consolidated Mines, Ltd. (now De Beers), in 1888, and meticulously extending the company's control over all facets of the diamond trade in the ensuing decades.

Most remarkably, De Beers manipulated not just supply but demand. In 1938, amid the ravages of the Depression and the rumblings of war, Harry Oppenheimer, the De Beers founder's son, recruited the New York–based ad agency N.W. Ayer to burnish the image of diamonds in the United States, where the practice of giving diamond engagement rings had been unevenly gaining traction for years, but where the diamonds sold were increasingly small and low-quality.

Meanwhile, the price of diamonds was falling around the world. The folks at Ayer set out to persuade young men that diamonds (and only diamonds) were synonymous with romance, and that the measure of a man's love (and even his personal and professional success) was directly proportional to the size and quality of the diamond he purchased. Young women, in turn, had to be convinced that courtship concluded, invariably, in a diamond.

Ayer insinuated these messages into the nooks and crannies of popular culture. It marketed an idea, not a diamond or brand:

quote:

Movie idols, the paragons of romance for the mass audience, would be given diamonds to use as their symbols of indestructible love. In addition, the agency suggested offering stories and society photographs to selected magazines and newspapers which would reinforce the link between diamonds and romance. Stories would stress the size of diamonds that celebrities presented to their loved ones, and photographs would conspicuously show the glittering stone on the hand of a well-known woman. Fashion designers would talk on radio programs about the "trend towards diamonds" that Ayer planned to start. ...
In its 1947 strategy plan, the advertising agency ... outlined a subtle program that included arranging for lecturers to visit high schools across the country. "All of these lectures revolve around the diamond engagement ring, and are reaching thousands of girls in their assemblies, classes and informal meetings in our leading educational institutions," the agency explained in a memorandum to De Beers. The agency had organized, in 1946, a weekly service called "Hollywood Personalities," which provided 125 leading newspapers with descriptions of the diamonds worn by movie stars. ... In 1947, the agency commissioned a series of portraits of "engaged socialites." The idea was to create prestigious "role models" for the poorer middle-class wage-earners. The advertising agency explained, in its 1948 strategy paper, "We spread the word of diamonds worn by stars of screen and stage, by wives and daughters of political leaders, by any woman who can make the grocer's wife and the mechanic's sweetheart say 'I wish I had what she has.'"



Posted by X123F45
Member since Apr 2015
27485 posts
Posted on 3/8/21 at 9:38 pm to
1.5ct moissanite engagement ring with vvs1 diamonds around it.

Band was an estate sale order. 1.3ct total old school european cut diamonds in platinum band.

Both look amazing. And not going with a diamond on the stone and instead going with the more fiery moissanite saved me 11k.

Having seen both side by side, a diamond does not compare.
Posted by Tyga Woods
South Central Jupiter Island, FL
Member since Sep 2016
30379 posts
Posted on 3/8/21 at 9:42 pm to
Diamonds are the female equivalent to truck nuts.
Posted by lockthevaught
Member since Jan 2013
2365 posts
Posted on 3/8/21 at 9:42 pm to
I gave my wife a family ring. I didn't have to buy shite.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram